Friday, February 2, 2024

Writ Petition of Police in action

 

DISTRICT : SOUTH 24 PARGANAS

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

 

W.P. No.                         (W) of 2018

 

In the matter of :

An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India;

 

And

 

In the matter of :

Shri Rabin Sardar, Son of Dulal Sardar, permanent resident of Bansra, arjuna, Joykrishna Nagar, Bansara, South 24 Parganas, Baruipur – 743363.                                          _______Petitioner

-      Versus –

 

1.   The State of West Bengal through the Secretary, Home Department ( Police ), having it’s Office at Navanna, 325, Sarad Chatterjee Road, Howrah – 711102.

 

2.   The Director General of Police, West Bengal, having his Office at Navanna, 325, Sarad Chatterjee Road, Howrah – 711102.

 

 

3.   The Superintendent of Police, for the Baruipur Police District, having his Office at Office of the Superintendent of Police, 1st, 3rd, and 4th Floor, Commercial Complex, Zila Parishad Bhaban, Baruipur Kulpi Road, Post Office & Police Station – Baruipur, District South 24 Parganas, Kolkata – 700 144.

 

 

4.   The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Crime Zone, for the Baruipur Police District, having his Office at Office of the Superintendent of Police, 1st, 3rd, and 4th Floor, Commercial Complex, Zila Parishad Bhaban, Baruipur Kulpi Road, Post Office & Police Station – Baruipur, District South 24 Parganas, Kolkata – 700 144.

 

 

5.   Shri Paresh Chandra Roy, Inspector in Charge of Sonarpur Police Station, having it’s address as H.C. Sarani, Post Office & Police Station Sonarpur, Kolkata – 700 150, District South 24 Parganas.

 

 

6.   Shri Krishnendu Pandey, Police Officer, of Sonarpur Police Station, having it’s address as H.C. Sarani, Post Office & Police Station Sonarpur, Kolkata – 700 150, District South 24 Parganas.

 

__________Respondents

To

The Hon’ble Justice Debasish Kar Gupta Acting Chief Justice and His Companion Justices of the Hon’ble Court

 

The humble petition of the petitioner above named most respectfully;

SHEWETH AS UNDER :

 

1.   The Petitioner is a Citizen of India, permanently residing at the address as given in the cause title of this application. The petitioner is presently residing at Sonarpur Bosepukur, Post Office – Ramkrishna Pally, Police Station – Sonarpur, District – South 24 Parganas, Kolkata – 700 150. The petitioner is a victim at the behest of Sonarpur Police authority concern, and therefore he has sufficient locus standi to move this writ application before the Hon’ble Court to get justice.

 

 

2.   That the Petitioner is a daily labour, earning thereby for his livelihood, staying with one lady namely Smt. Jhumpa Mondal, in a live in relationship, at Sonarpur Bosepukur, Post Office – Ramkrishna Pally, Police Station – Sonarpur, District – South 24 Parganas, Kolkata – 700 150.

 

 

3.   That on 2nd day of October’ 2018, i.e. on Tuseday, in the evening while your petitioner was at the rented house at Sonarpur Bosepukur, Post Office – Ramkrishna Pally, Police Station – Sonarpur, District – South 24 Parganas, Kolkata – 700 150, then some member of club in the local namely Purbashree Club, demanded “Chanda” subscription for Durga Puja as of Rs. 50,000/- ( Rupees Fifty Thousand ) only, at the said occasion your petitioner have two female guests, and whereas according to the demand of the said club member for Puja, they shouted on your petitioner and on his female guests, and whereas they called Police from the Sonarpur Police Station, and handed over your petitioner to the Police and his female guests alleging that your petitioner is running a business of immoral trafficking at the said premises, and on the said night about 9 pm the Inspector in Charge of Sonarpur Police Station Shri Paresh Chandra Roy, and one another Police Officer Shri Krishnendu Pandey, and others, taken off cloth of your petitioner and in front of those female guests at the Sonarpur Police Station, beaten up mercilessly, and used most filthy languages, and tied penny with brick and pulled forcibly, and pressed your petitioner’s finger with pencil, and pulled down the head of your petitioner’s to the earth and put chair on back of your petitioner, kick on the private part of your petitioner, and whereas one police on the private part of your petitioner inserted match box sticks powder and tried to lit up, whole night periodically some of the police officer beaten up your petitioner in different manner, the Police Officer who beaten up your petitioner, your petitioner can identify on seeing them, on the next morning at about 8 am the Police released your petitioner, somehow, your petitioner returned to his home. The police threatened your petitioner to leave the Sonarpur Police Station jurisdiction. Your petitioner visited M.R. Bangur Hospital, for his treatment, presently your petitioner suffering from pain in his body, and unable to seat and sleep, in any manner.

 

 

4.   That your petitioner was not able to seat and sleep and therefore was at home while returning on release by the Sonarpur Police Station, and thereafter with the help of his friend and well wisher on the very next day i.e. 04-08-2018, visited the M.R.Bangur Hospital, and being treated by the Doctors, return back to his home.

 

Photostat copy of the injury report of M.R. Bangur Hospital dated 04-08-2018, is enclosing herewith and marked as Annexure “P-1”

 

 

5.   That on 04-08-2018, at about 4:30 pm, some of the Club members visited the house of your petitioner and threatened to leave the premises immediately otherwise they will teach a lesson to him, and the police will not do anything against them, therefore Since your petitioner is a poor and rustic person, he has no other residential accommodation, due to fear of loss of his life by the said Club member and the Police conjointly, the petitioner leave the house, then and there with his live in relation lady Smt. Jhumpa Mondal. As a result, the petitioner is moving from one street to another.

 

 

6.   That on next day i.e. 05-10-2018, your petitioner visited the M.R.Bangur Hospital with Smt. Jhumpa Mondal, whereas She was treated by the Doctors, and medicine prescribed as she was also sustained solemn injury on her body, as caused by the respondent nos. 5, and 6, herein.

 

Photostat copy of the injury report of M.R. Bangur Hospital dated 05-08-2018, is enclosing herewith and marked as Annexure “P-2”

 

 

7.   That the Petitioner and the said Smt. Jhumpa Mondal, was illegally detained by the Sonarpur Police Station, more particularly by the Respondent nos. 5, and 6, herein, since 9 pm on 02- 10-2018 to 8 am 03-10-2018.

 

 

8.   That the Respondent nos. 5, and 6, being the Police Officer of the Sonarpur Police Station, miss utilize their power granted under the Police Act’ 1861, and therefore illegally detained your petitioner and the said Smt. Jhumpa Mondal, since 9 pm on 02- 10-2018 to 8 am 03-10-2018, which accumulating as period of Twelve Hours.

 

 

9.   That the Respondent nos. 5, and 6, being the Police Officer of the Sonarpur Police Station, miss utilize their power granted under the Police Act’ 1861, and therefore illegally arrested and cause arrest of your petitioner and the said Smt. Jhumpa Mondal, at about 9 pm on 2nd day of October’ 2018.

 

 

10.                That the Respondent nos. 5, and 6, being the Police Officer of the Sonarpur Police Station, miss utilize their power granted under the Police Act’ 1861, and therefore illegally arrested and cause arrest of the said Smt. Jhumpa Mondal, at about 9 pm on 2nd day of October’ 2018, without any help of Ladies and or female Police personnel.

 

 

11.                That the Respondent nos. 5, and 6, being the Police Officer of the Sonarpur Police Station, cause arrest of your petitioner and the said Smt. Jhumpa Mondal, at about 9 pm on 2nd day of October’ 2018, without any cogent reasons and basis thereof.

 

 

12.                That  the Respondent nos. 5, and 6, being the Police Officer of the Sonarpur Police Station, shows their most worst and inhuman faces to your petitioner and the said Smt. Jhumpa Mondal, and consequently crossed the limits of brutality, which we heard from the Mughal period of History pages, thereof.

 

 

13.                That the Respondent nos. 5, and 6, being persons of Sovereign Authority of the States acted in such a perverted manners, which constitute the Police Establishment become the Establishment of Fear and threat, so far.

 

 

14.                That your Petitioner got depressed and under fear of loss of his life at the behest of the respondent nos. 5, and 6, herein, as the said respondents threaten to leave the Sonarpur Police Station jurisdiction, and or otherwise they encounter your petitioner in some other criminal cases.

 

 

15.                That on 6th day of October’ 2018, your petitioner lodge his Complaint stating inter alia the facts which has been occurred at the behest of the Respondent nos. 5, and 6, to the Superintendent of Police, for the Baruipur Police Dustrict, at Baruipur, South 24 Parganas.

 

Photostat copy of the Written Complaint dated 6th day of October’ 2018, is enclosing herewith and marked as Annexure “P-3”.

 

 

16.                That your Petitioner thereafter realizing that some of the Police personnel of the Sonarpur Police Station were following your petitioner and thus your petitioner some arranged himself to save his person.

 

 

17.                That Even though the Complaint has been submitted by the Petitioner with the Superintendent of Police for the Baruipur Police Diustrict, at Baruipur, South 24 Parganas, no action and or direction has ever been given or issued in such context upon the respondent nos. 5, and 6, who shows their brutality to the optimum to your petitioner in overnight period at the abode of the legal institution, being Sonarpur Police Station, at Sonarpur, South 24 Parganas, and violate every rights as enshrined under Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India, and prescribed provisions of the Human Rights Act’ 1993.

 

 

18.                That no Law of Land has ever been prescribed by the State to taken off cloth of your petitioner and in front of those female guests at the Sonarpur Police Station, beaten up mercilessly, and used most filthy languages, and tied penny with brick and pulled forcibly, and pressed your petitioner’s finger with pencil, and pulled down the head of your petitioner’s to the earth and put chair on back of your petitioner, kick on the private part of your petitioner, and whereas one police on the private part of your petitioner inserted match box sticks powder and tried to lit up, whole night periodically some of the police officer beaten up your petitioner in different manner.

 

 

19.                That such a brutality must be investigated against the respondent nos. 5 and 6, in pursuance to ensure the rule of Law and the faith in the institution i.e. Sonarpur Police Station, in the interest of the Society at large, and to pursue the protection of a person and his property in terms of the Constitution of India.

 

 

 

20.                That such a brutality of the respondent nos. 5, and 6, which has been occurred at their behest on your petitioner in overnight period of 2nd day of October’ 2018, cannot condone in any manner, as such said brutality crossed every limits of your petitioner’s tolerance.

 

 

21.                That your petitioner lodge such facts to the other legal enforceable institutions in pursuance to get protection of his person and necessary actions against the respondent nos. 5 and 6, in terms of the prescribed provision of law, the institutions as of The Human Right Commissions, West Bengal, West Bengal Women Commission, and others.

 

Photostat copy of the Written Complaint dated 6th day of October’ 2018, to the other legal enforceable institutions, are enclosing herewith and marked collectively as Annexure “P-4”.

 

 

22.                That your petitioner therefore in compelling circumstances in belief that his life reasonably in danger and thus your petitioner passes his ever second of life in fear and threat of his loss of life at the behest of the respondent nos. 5, and 6.

 

 

23.                That being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the purported perverted actions and or activities on the part of the respondents police authorities as complained herein before, the petitioner beg to move this Writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, before the Hon’ble Court on, amongst others, the following :

 

G R O U N D S

 

I.             FOR THAT on 2nd day of October’ 2018, the petitioner was wrongfully confined by the respondent nos. 5, and 6, and their associates being the other police personnel shows their acts and omission of indefinite brutality on your petitioner;

 

 

II.           FOR THAT during such wrongful confinement of the petitioner, your petitioner was abused, assaulted differently at the optimum, tortured and deprived of sleep and medicine, and essentials of life and under such circumstances, your petitioner was forced under threat of losing his life;

 

 

III.          FOR THAT That on 2nd day of October’ 2018, i.e. on Tuseday, in the evening while your petitioner was at the rented house at Sonarpur Bosepukur, Post Office – Ramkrishna Pally, Police Station – Sonarpur, District – South 24 Parganas, Kolkata – 700 150, then some member of club in the local namely Purbashree Club, demanded “Chanda” subscription for Durga Puja as of Rs. 50,000/- ( Rupees Fifty Thousand ) only, at the said occasion your petitioner have two female guests, and whereas according to the demand of the said club member for Puja, they shouted on your petitioner and on his female guests, and whereas they called Police from the Sonarpur Police Station, and handed over your petitioner to the Police and his female guests alleging that your petitioner is running a business of immoral trafficking at the said premises, and on the said night about 9 pm the Inspector in Charge of Sonarpur Police Station Shri Paresh Chandra Roy, and one another Police Officer Shri Krishnendu Pandey, and others, taken off cloth of your petitioner and in front of those female guests at the Sonarpur Police Station, beaten up mercilessly, and used most filthy languages, and tied penny with brick and pulled forcibly, and pressed your petitioner’s finger with pencil, and pulled down the head of your petitioner’s to the earth and put chair on back of your petitioner, kick on the private part of your petitioner, and whereas one police on the private part of your petitioner inserted match box sticks powder and tried to lit up, whole night periodically some of the police officer beaten up your petitioner in different manner, the Police Officer who beaten up your petitioner, your petitioner can identify on seeing them, on the next morning at about 8 am the Police released your petitioner, somehow, your petitioner returned to his home. The police threatened your petitioner to leave the Sonarpur Police Station jurisdiction. Your petitioner visited M.R. Bangur Hospital, for his treatment, presently your petitioner suffering from pain in his body, and unable to seat and sleep, in any manner;

 

 

IV.         FOR THAT your petitioner was not able to seat and sleep and therefore was at home while returning on release by the Sonarpur Police Station, and thereafter with the help of his friend and well wisher on the very next day i.e. 04-08-2018, visited the M.R.Bangur Hospital, and being treated by the Doctors, return back to his home;

 

V.           FOR THAT on 04-08-2018, at about 4:30 pm, some of the Club members visited the house of your petitioner and threatened to leave the premises immediately otherwise they will teach a lesson to him, and the police will not do anything against them, therefore Since your petitioner is a poor and rustic person, he has no other residential accommodation, due to fear of loss of his life by the said Club member and the Police conjointly, the petitioner leave the house, then and there with his live in relation lady Smt. Jhumpa Mondal. As a result, the petitioner is moving from one street to another;

 

 

VI.         FOR THAT on next day i.e. 05-10-2018, your petitioner visited the M.R.Bangur Hospital with Smt. Jhumpa Mondal, whereas She was treated by the Doctors, and medicine prescribed as she was also sustained solemn injury on her body, as caused by the respondent nos. 5, and 6, herein;

 

 

VII.        FOR THAT the Petitioner and the said Smt. Jhumpa Mondal, was illegally detained by the Sonarpur Police Station, more particularly by the Respondent nos. 5, and 6, herein, since 9 pm on 02- 10-2018 to 8 am 03-10-2018;

 

VIII.      FOR THAT the Respondent nos. 5, and 6, being the Police Officer of the Sonarpur Police Station, miss utilize their power granted under the Police Act’ 1861, and therefore illegally detained your petitioner and the said Smt. Jhumpa Mondal, since 9 pm on 02- 10-2018 to 8 am 03-10-2018, which accumulating as period of Twelve Hours;

 

 

IX.         FOR THAT the Respondent nos. 5, and 6, being the Police Officer of the Sonarpur Police Station, miss utilize their power granted under the Police Act’ 1861, and therefore illegally arrested and cause arrest of your petitioner and the said Smt. Jhumpa Mondal, at about 9 pm on 2nd day of October’ 2018;

 

 

X.           FOR THAT the Respondent nos. 5, and 6, being the Police Officer of the Sonarpur Police Station, miss utilize their power granted under the Police Act’ 1861, and therefore illegally arrested and cause arrest of the said Smt. Jhumpa Mondal, at about 9 pm on 2nd day of October’ 2018, without any help of Ladies and or female Police personnel;

 

 

XI.         FOR THAT the Respondent nos. 5, and 6, being the Police Officer of the Sonarpur Police Station, cause arrest of your petitioner and the said Smt. Jhumpa Mondal, at about 9 pm on 2nd day of October’ 2018, without any cogent reasons and basis thereof;

 

 

XII.       FOR THAT the Respondent nos. 5, and 6, being the Police Officer of the Sonarpur Police Station, shows their most worst and inhuman faces to your petitioner and the said Smt. Jhumpa Mondal, and consequently crossed the limits of brutality, which we heard from the Mughal period of History pages, thereof;

 

 

XIII.      FOR THAT the Respondent nos. 5, and 6, being persons of Sovereign Authority of the States acted in such a perverted manners, which constitute the Police Establishment become the Establishment of Fear and threat, so far;

 

 

XIV.     FOR THAT your Petitioner got depressed and under fear of loss of his life at the behest of the respondent nos. 5, and 6, herein, as the said respondents threaten to leave the Sonarpur Police Station jurisdiction, and or otherwise they encounter your petitioner in some other criminal cases;

 

 

XV.       FOR THAT on 6th day of October’ 2018, your petitioner lodge his Complaint stating inter alia the facts which has been occurred at the behest of the Respondent nos. 5, and 6, to the Superintendent of Police, for the Baruipur Police Dustrict, at Baruipur, South 24 Parganas;

 

 

XVI.     FOR THAT your Petitioner thereafter realizing that some of the Police personnel of the Sonarpur Police Station were following your petitioner and thus your petitioner some arranged himself to save his person;

 

 

XVII.    FOR THAT Even though the Complaint has been submitted by the Petitioner with the Superintendent of Police for the Baruipur Police Diustrict, at Baruipur, South 24 Parganas, no action and or direction has ever been given or issued in such context upon the respondent nos. 5, and 6, who shows their brutality to the optimum to your petitioner in overnight period at the abode of the legal institution, being Sonarpur Police Station, at Sonarpur, South 24 Parganas, and violate every rights as enshrined under Article 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India, and prescribed provisions of the Human Rights Act’ 1993;

 

 

XVIII.  FOR THAT no Law of Land has ever been prescribed by the State to taken off cloth of your petitioner and in front of those female guests at the Sonarpur Police Station, beaten up mercilessly, and used most filthy languages, and tied penny with brick and pulled forcibly, and pressed your petitioner’s finger with pencil, and pulled down the head of your petitioner’s to the earth and put chair on back of your petitioner, kick on the private part of your petitioner, and whereas one police on the private part of your petitioner inserted match box sticks powder and tried to lit up, whole night periodically some of the police officer beaten up your petitioner in different manner;

 

 

XIX.     FOR THAT such a brutality must be investigated against the respondent nos. 5 and 6, in pursuance to ensure the rule of Law and the faith in the institution i.e. Sonarpur Police Station, in the interest of the Society at large, and to pursue the protection of a person and his property in terms of the Constitution of India;

 

 

XX.       FOR THAT such a brutality of the respondent nos. 5, and 6, which has been occurred at their behest on your petitioner in overnight period of 2nd day of October’ 2018, cannot condone in any manner, as such said brutality crossed every limits of your petitioner’s tolerance;

 

 

XXI.     FOR THAT your petitioner lodge such facts to the other legal enforceable institutions in pursuance to get protection of his person and necessary actions against the respondent nos. 5 and 6, in terms of the prescribed provision of law, the institutions as of The Human Right Commissions, West Bengal, West Bengal Women Commission, and others;

 

 

XXII.   FOR THAT your petitioner therefore in compelling circumstances in belief that his life reasonably in danger and thus your petitioner passes his ever second of life in fear and threat of his loss of life at the behest of the respondent nos. 5, and 6;

 

 

24.                Your petitioner has no other efficacious and alternative remedy and the relief sought for herein if grant would afford your petitioner complete redress.

 

 

25.                Your petitioner has not moved before this Hon’ble Court or any other Court on the self same cause of action.

 

 

26.                This application is made bonafide and in the interest of justice and unless orders as prayed for are made your petitioner will suffer irreparable loss and prejudice.

 

 

Your petitioner, therefore, most respectfully prays before Your Lordships for an order :

 

a)    A writ of and / or order and / or direction in the nature of Mandamus do issue commanding and / or directing the respondents police authorities to forthwith identifying the erring police officials and lodge FIR against them and cause necessary investigation in terms of the prescribed provisions of the Law ;

 

b)   A writ of and / or order and / or direction in the nature of Mandamus do issue commanding and / or directing the respondents police authorities to protect the person and property of your petitioner;

 

 

c)    A writ of and / or order and / or direction in the nature of Mandamus do issue commanding and / or directing the respondents police authorities more particularly the state of West Bengal to compensate the petitioner as may be assessed by the Hon’ble Court for infringement of his personal liberty and the damages done by the Officers of the State to the petitioner;

 

 

d)   A writ of and / or order and / or direction in the nature of Mandamus do issue commanding and / or directing the respondents police authorities to act upon the Complaint dated 6th day of October’ 2018, in accordance with law and investigate into such complaint of the petitioner against the said erring police officer, in terms of the Law, as ensure justice;

 

 

e)    A writ of and / or order and / or direction in the nature of Mandamus do issue commanding and / or directing the respondents police authorities to aid and assist the petitioner to use and utilize and enjoy his such rented premises within the jurisdiction of the Sonarpur Police Station;

 

 

f)     An appropriate writ or direction do issue for production of all relevant records and / or protection of all the rights of the petitioner and for granting the petitioner such relief as in the circumstances shall be just;

 

g)    Rule Nisi in terms of prayer (a) to (f) above;

 

 

h)   Suitable orders as to costs be made;

 

 

i)     Such further and / or other orders be made and / or direction or directions be given as would afford complete relief to your petitioner.

 

And your petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray

AFFIDAVIT

I, Shri Rabin Sardar, Son of Dulal Sardar, aged about 36 years, by faith Hindu, by Occupation Daily Labour, permanently residing at Bansra, arjuna, Joykrishna Nagar, Bansara, South 24 Parganas, Baruipur - 743363, do hereby solemnly affirm and state as follows :

 

1.   I am the Petitioner of this present Writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and I am well conversant and acquitance with the material facts as stated therein by me. I am competent to swear this affidavit.

 

2.   The statement made in ________________ of the foregoing petition are true to my knowledge, those contained in paragraph nos. _______________________________, thereof are based on information received from the record, which I verily believe to be true and those contained in paragraph nos. ________________________, thereof are my humble submissions to the Hon’ble Court.

 

 

 

 

The Deponent is known to me,

Clerk to Mr.                            

Advocate

Prepared in my Chamber,

 

 

Advocate

 

          Solemnly affirmed before me,

This the ___day of October’ 2018.

Commissioner

 

 

 

 

 

 

District : South 24 Parganas

 

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

 

 

W.P. no.                (W) of 2018

 

In the matter of :

 

Shri Rabin Sardar,

______Petitioner

-      Versus –

-       

The State of West Bengal and Others.

                   _________Respondents

 

 

 

 

 

 

WRIT APPLICATION
UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advocate – on – record :

 

Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate

High Court Bar association Room No. 15, High Court at Calcutta

Mobile Number : 9883070666 / 9836829666

 

Bail Petition in Consumer Case

 

Before the Hon’ble District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, at Baruipur, South 24 Parganas.

 

                                                          EA/88/2015

{ arising out of Complaint Case no. CC/598/2014 }

In the matter of :

Shri Nirmal Chandra Banerjee,

                   ________Decree Holder.

-      Versus –

Shri Ram Chandra Shaw,

          _______Judgment Debtor

Bail Petition

The humble petition on behalf of the above named Judgment Debtor Shri Ram Chandra Shaw, most respectfully;

Sheweth as under :

 

1.   That on 04-05-2018, the Judgment Debtor voluntarily surrendered before the Hon’ble Forum, and placed his prayer for release on bail bond at any terms and conditions, as may be determine by the Hon’ble Forum, However, the Hon’ble Forum, was pleased to refused and reject the bail prayer of the Judgment Debtor and taken into jail custody till 14-05-2018, and directed the Jail authority for the production of the Judgment Debtor in person as on 14-05-2018, and consequently on several occasion including today i.e. 20-08-2018, before the Hon’ble Forum.

 

2.   That the Judgment Debtor challenging the Order dated 20-08-2018, passed by the Hon’ble Forum, preferred one appeal under Section 27A of the Consumer Protection Act’ 1986, before the Hon’ble State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal, viz. A/774/2018, wherein the appeal was heard on 12-10-2018, the Hon’ble State Commission, West Bengal, passed necessary order, in the said appeal, which furnished as follows :

Challenge in this appeal under Section 27A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) is to the Order No. 34 dated 20.08.2018 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, South 24 Parganas at Baruipur (in short, ‘Ld. District Forum’) in Execution Application No. 88/2015 stems from Consumer Complaint No. 598/2014.

          We have scrutinised the materials on record and considered the submission advanced by the Ld. Advocate appearing for the appellant and Appellant and Respondent, who appeared in person.

          Having heard both sides appearing for the parties and on going through the materials on record, it would reveal that the Respondent herein being complainant lodged a consumer complaint under Section 12 of the Act being CC/598/2014 before the Ld. District Forum against the Appellant, i.e. Proprietor of Sarada Construction on the allegation of deficiency in services on the part of him for non-delivery of possession, non-execution of Sale Deed in respect of two flats on the ground floor and 2nd floor respectively at Kamrabad, P.S.- Sonarpur, Dist- South 24 Parganas, Kolkata – 700150 within the local limits of Rajpur-Sonarpur Municipality on 11.12.2014. The said complaint was allowed ex-parte on 31.03.2015 against the appellant with certain directions which are mentioned hereinbelow:

          “That the application under Section 12 of the C.P. Act is allowed ex-parte.

The OP is directed to execute and register the Deed of Conveyance of the said two flats after accepting of Rs.2,40,000/- from the complainant within 45 days from the date of this order and also deliver possession of the two flats ......”.

Challenging the said order, the OP/appellant preferred an appeal under Section 15 of the Act before this Commission being FA/1347/2015 and the said appeal was summarily dismissed as the application for condonation of delay was rejected.  To assail the said order, a Revision Petition was moved before Hon’ble National Commission being RP/3236/2016 and the said revision petition was dismissed for non-prosecution by an order dated 21.04.2017.  Therefore, the order passed by the Ld. District Forum has attained finality. 

          Since the said basic order has not been complied with by the Judgement Debtor/Appellant, the complainant being Decree Holder put the order in execution being EA/88/2015.  

          By the impugned order, the Ld. District Forum has passed an order and extract of the order is recorded below:

          “34.

23.05.2018 

          The J.Dr. Ram Chandra Shaw is produced from the Judicial custody.

          Ld. Lawyers of both the parties are present.

          One petition is filed on behalf of the J.Dr., praying for release on bail.  There is no merit in the bail petition, as the decree passed by this Forum has still remained unsatisfied.  The appeal preferred by the J.Dr. being FA No.A/471/2018 under Section 27A of the C.P. Act, 1986 against the Order No.26 dated 04.05.2018 passed by this Forum has also been dismissed and the order of this Forum is affirmed.  Therefore, the bail prayer is rejected .......”.

          Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Ld. Advocate for the Appellant drawing my attention to the basic order has submitted that in compliance with the final order, the respondent has not yet deposited Rs.2,40,000/- which is a pre-requisite condition for getting the Deed executed in his favour.  He has submitted that till the said amount is paid or deposited, the respondent/D.Hr. cannot enforce the order.

          The Respondent, who appeared in person has contended that the Appellant has sold out the flats to third party and as such he did not deposit the said amount.  However, if any direction is given, he is ready and willing to deposit the amount of Rs.2,40,000/- as per basic order.

          We have given due consideration to the submission made on behalf of the parties and scrutinised the materials on record.

          The fact remains that as per the final order/judgement, the payment of Rs.2,40,000/- by the D.Hr. was a pre-requisite condition.  Therefore, unless the said amount is paid or deposited, the judgement debtor/appellant has no liability to execute the Sale Deed or to deliver possession in favour of the decree holder/respondent.  It is well settled that an executing Court cannot go beyond its order.  Admittedly, when the respondent/decree holder has not yet deposited Rs.2,40,000/- as per basic order, the Ld. District Forum should have asked the decree holder to deposit the said amount as a condition precedent for execution of Deed of Conveyance  or for delivery of possession.

          Previously, the Judgement Debtor preferred an appeal being A/471/2018 on 14.05.2018 and the said appeal was dismissed on 16.08.2018 on a technical ground keeping in view the decision of Hon’ble National Commission reported in 2018 (2) CPR 558 [Ravikant G. Salaskar – Vs. – Kirit Shah & Ors.].  By a subsequent order, in a review application being No.128/2018 the Hon’ble National Commission has held that an appeal lies under Section 27A of the Act, whether it is interim or final.  Therefore, the maintainability of the instant appeal could not be challenged.

          Considering the above, when the impugned order suffers from the basic tenet of the order for non-payment/deposit of Rs.2,40,000/- by the decree holder, it is liable to be set aside.

          In view of the above, the appeal is allowed on contest.  There will be no order as to costs.

          The impugned order is hereby set aside.  The J.Dr. may be released forthwith.

          The parties are directed to appear before the Ld. District Forum on 27.11.2018 and on that date the respondent/decree holder must deposit the balance amount of Rs.2,40,000/- in the Ld. District Forum which shall be kept in a fixed deposit account for one year for the time being and thereafter the Ld. District Forum will proceed to execute its solemn order in accordance with law.

          The Registrar of the Commission is directed to send a copy of this order to the Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, South 24 Parganas at Baruipur for information.”

 

 

 

The print out copy of the order dated 12-10-2018, is enclosing herewith this petition.

 

3.   That in view of the facts that the Judgment Debtor is in jail custody, since the date as on 04-05-2018, to till date, the Judgment Debtor Seeks to get release on bail at any terms and or conditions, as may be imposed by the Hon’ble Forum, in the interest of administration of justice.

 

4.   That it is pertinent to states that one Appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act’ 1986, has been placed by the appellant herein vide memo of appeal being no. A/1347/2015, arising out of the proceeding being no. CC/598/2014, decided by the Learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, at Baruipur, South 24 Parganas. The said appeal has been decided by the Hon’ble Commission, West Bengal, on 22-08-2016, as “ instant appeal is dismissed being time barred”.

 

5.   That it is also pertinent to states that one Revision Petition has been placed by the appellant herein before the Hon’ble NCDRC, New Delhi, viz. RP / 3236 / 2016, challenging the Order dated 22-08-2016, passed by the Hon’ble State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal, in A / 1347 / 2015, and whereas the said Revision Petition has been dismissed as on 21-04-2017, due to non compliance of introlucatory order of payment upon the appellant herein.

 

6.   That thus in view of the facts that while the said appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act’ 1986, and the Revisional application before the Hon’ble NCDRC, New Delhi, while dismissed, the final order & Judgment dated 31-03-2015, passed by the Learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, at Alipore, now at present at Baruipur, South 24 Parganas, in CC/ 598 /2014, has been affirmed, in terms of the prescribed provisions of the Law.

 

7.   That the operative portion of the final order & Judgment dated 31-03-2015, passed by the Learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, at Alipore, now at present at Baruipur, South 24 Parganas, in CC/ 598 /2014, is reproduced herein as follows :

 

“That the application under section 12 of the C.P Act is allowed exparte.

The O.P is directed to execute and register the deed of conveyance of the said two flats after accepting Rs.2,40,000/- from the complainant within 45 days from the date of this order and also deliver possession of the two flats , failing which complainant is at liberty to execute the same through the machinery of this Forum after depositing the remaining consideration money to this Forum.

O.P is hereby instated not to deliver possession of the said two flats save and except the complainant. If the O.P failed to put in possession of the flats after receiving Rs.2,40,000/- ,then the complainant is at liberty to approach before the local P.S i.e. Sonarpur P.S. and in that event Officer-In-Charge of Sonarpur P.S will render necessary assistance so that the complainant may get possession of the two flats .

O.P is directed to pay litigation cost of Rs.5000/- to the complainant within that stipulated period.”

 

8.   That it is to states that the Execution proceeding being EA/88/2015, has been placed by the Decree Holder herein before the Hon’ble District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, at Baruipur, South 24 Parganas, arising out of the proceeding being no. CC/598/2014, and the same has been continuing before the Hon’ble Forum.

 

9.   That it is to states that the Executing Forum cannot go beyond the Decree being the final order & Judgment dated 31-03-2015, passed by the Hon’ble District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, at Alipore, now at present at Baruipur, South 24 Parganas, in CC/ 598 /2014, and whereas the direction upon the Complainant being the Decree Holder in this Execution application being EA/88/2015, is a pre requisition requirement, which has not ever been complied with by the Decree Holder, and whereas as per direction of the said final order & Judgment dated 31-03-2015, passed by the Hon’ble District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, at Alipore, now at present at Baruipur, South 24 Parganas, in CC/ 598 /2014, in absence of compliance of the Decree Holder, the Judgment Debtor cannot perform, thereof and therefore the first performance has been commenced on the decree holder which has not ever been performed and thus in absence of any performance by the decree holder, no performance can call for by the Judgment Debtor, in terms of the directions of the Hon’ble Forum below, as enumerated in the final order & Judgment dated 31-03-2015, passed by the Hon’ble District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, at Alipore, now at present at Baruipur, South 24 Parganas, in CC/ 598 /2014.

 

10.                That in view of the facts that the performance of the Decree Holder is a prerequisite, in terms of the final order, the Judgment Debtor Seeks to get release on bail at any terms and or conditions, as may be imposed by the Hon’ble Forum, in the interest of administration of justice.

 

11.                That unless the bail, grant by the Hon’ble Forum, the Judgment Debtor will highly prejudice and suffer with irreparable loss and injury, thereof.

 

12.                That the balance of convenience and inconveniences are in favour of the Judgment Debtor, and the Decree Holder will not prejudice.

 

13.                That this application is made bonafide in the interest of administration of justice.

 

It is therefore prayed that your Honour would graciously be pleased to allow this application and to grant release on Bail at any terms and condition, to the Judgment Debtor, in the interest of administration of justice, and or to pass such other necessary order or orders as your Honour may deem, fit, and proper for the end of justice.

And for this act of kindness, the Petitioner, as in duty bound shall ever pray.