Wednesday, August 26, 2026

“Once You Carry Your Own Water, You’ll Remember Every Drop.” — African Proverb

 

“Once You Carry Your Own Water, You’ll Remember Every Drop.”

— African Proverb

This profound African proverb contains a timeless lesson about struggle, responsibility, gratitude and the true value of resources. Water may appear ordinary when it flows effortlessly from a tap, but its importance becomes unforgettable when one must travel a long distance, carry a heavy vessel and carefully bring it home. The labour involved in obtaining it transforms every drop into something precious.

The proverb is not merely about water. Water is a metaphor for everything that sustains our lives—money, food, education, shelter, opportunity, dignity, success and even the affection of those who stand beside us. When these things are easily available, we may take them for granted. But when we have struggled to acquire them through our own effort, we understand their real worth and use them with greater care.

A person who has carried water knows its weight. He knows the distance travelled, the physical exhaustion endured and the time spent obtaining it. Therefore, he will not waste it carelessly. In the same way, a person who has earned money through honest labour usually understands the value of every rupee. Someone who has built a career after years of hardship respects every opportunity. A student who has studied under difficult circumstances values education more deeply. A person who has faced loneliness knows the worth of sincere companionship.

Hardship often teaches what comfort cannot. Comfort allows us to enjoy things, but struggle teaches us to respect them. When everything is provided without effort, entitlement can quietly replace gratitude. We may begin to assume that conveniences, privileges and opportunities will always remain available. However, when we are required to obtain them through our own labour, patience and sacrifice, our attitude changes. We become more responsible, disciplined and appreciative.

The expression “carry your own water” also represents personal responsibility. It reminds us that maturity begins when we stop expecting others to carry every burden on our behalf. Parents, teachers, friends and society may support us, but there comes a time when each person must accept responsibility for his or her own life. We must make decisions, face consequences, solve problems and work for the future we desire.

Those who repeatedly avoid responsibility may never fully appreciate the efforts of the people who support them. A child may waste food until he understands the labour of the farmer and the sacrifice of the parents who purchased it. An employee may complain about a workplace without understanding the risks taken by the person who created it. A citizen may demand public facilities without recognising the discipline, taxation and collective effort required to maintain them.

Carrying one’s own water does not mean rejecting help or refusing cooperation. Human beings thrive through mutual assistance. Rather, the proverb asks us to understand the labour behind what we receive. Even when someone else brings the water, wisdom requires us to remember that it did not arrive without effort. Gratitude grows when we learn to recognise the visible and invisible contributions of others.

Every meal placed before us contains the labour of farmers, transporters, traders and family members. Every road reflects the work of engineers and labourers. Every book carries the knowledge and dedication of its author. Every legal right has behind it the sacrifice of people who struggled for justice. Every peaceful night is protected by individuals who remain awake in service of society and the nation. Nothing meaningful reaches us entirely without effort.

This proverb also offers an important lesson for leadership. A leader who has personally experienced the difficulties of ordinary people is more likely to understand their needs. Those who have walked the difficult road themselves usually govern, guide and serve with greater sensitivity. They know that policies and decisions are not merely words on paper; they directly affect the lives of people who may already be carrying heavy burdens.

Similarly, parents should provide their children with love and opportunity, but they must also teach them the dignity of effort. If every difficulty is removed before a child encounters it, the child may grow up without understanding patience, discipline or gratitude. Allowing young people to undertake age-appropriate responsibilities prepares them for life. A protected childhood is valuable, but a completely effortless upbringing can leave a person unprepared for reality.

Success achieved through personal struggle has a special dignity. When a person remembers the sleepless nights, repeated failures, financial difficulties and sacrifices that preceded success, arrogance usually gives way to humility. He understands that progress was not automatic. Consequently, he values his achievement and may also become more compassionate towards those who are still struggling.

Those who rise from humble beginnings rarely forget the meaning of scarcity. A person who has once gone hungry understands the importance of food. Someone who has lived without shelter appreciates the security of a home. One who has suffered injustice recognises the value of fairness. Personal experience turns abstract ideas into living truths.

There is also an environmental message within this proverb. Humanity often wastes natural resources because modern convenience conceals the difficulty of obtaining them. Water appears instantly from taps, electricity comes at the press of a switch and food arrives neatly packaged. We forget the rivers, forests, soil, labour and energy behind these conveniences. If each person had to collect and carry the water used every day, wastage would decline dramatically.

Nature has provided enough for human need, but not for unlimited carelessness. Every drop of water saved is an act of responsibility towards future generations. The proverb therefore invites us to live consciously—to use resources with restraint, recognise their limits and protect what cannot easily be replaced.

At a deeper spiritual level, the saying teaches mindfulness. To “remember every drop” means to remain aware of every blessing. Life itself is made up of small moments that are often ignored while we chase larger ambitions. A kind word, a shared meal, a peaceful morning, good health, family affection and an honest friendship may appear ordinary, but together they make life meaningful.

People frequently understand the value of these blessings only after losing them. We appreciate health after illness, companionship after separation, freedom after restriction and time after it has passed. Wisdom lies in appreciating these things while they are still present. We need not lose something before recognising its importance.

The proverb also teaches empathy. Once we have carried a burden ourselves, we become less inclined to judge those who are struggling beneath it. Personal hardship can soften the heart. It reminds us that behind every tired face there may be an untold journey, and behind every modest achievement there may be extraordinary effort.

However, carrying our own water should not make us proud or insensitive. We should not say, “I suffered, so everyone else must suffer.” The nobler lesson is: “I know how heavy the burden is, so I will help another person carry it.” Experience reaches its highest purpose when it produces compassion rather than superiority.

Therefore, this African proverb is a call to responsibility without selfishness, independence without arrogance and gratitude without complacency. It asks us to recognise effort, conserve resources, honour honest labour and remain thankful for every blessing that sustains our lives.

Carry your responsibilities with courage. Earn your achievements with integrity. Respect the sacrifices of those who helped you. Use every resource carefully. Above all, never forget the value of what has reached you through labour, patience and sacrifice.

When you know the weight of the vessel, you will respect the water.

When you know the cost of struggle, you will value success.

When you understand sacrifice, you will remember every blessing.

— Ashok Kumar Singh
Advocate, High Court at Calcutta

HINDUISM CANNOT BE MEASURED THROUGH A CORPORATE BALANCE SHEET

 

HINDUISM CANNOT BE MEASURED THROUGH A CORPORATE BALANCE SHEET

If anyone attempts to understand Hinduism solely through the narrow prism of corporate accounting—by calculating expenditure, measuring immediate financial returns, or demanding a commercial justification for every sacred tradition—such a person will inevitably fail to comprehend its true character. Hinduism cannot be evaluated as though it were a commercial enterprise governed merely by profit, loss, investment and material return. To approach an ancient civilizational faith with the mindset of a corporate auditor is to misunderstand both its depth and its purpose.

Hinduism is not merely a religion confined within a rigid book, a uniform institution or a fixed set of commandments. It is an ancient, living and continuously evolving civilizational faith. It represents a way of life founded upon spiritual consciousness, inherited traditions, philosophical inquiry, devotion, sacrifice, tolerance and coexistence. Its foundations were laid over thousands of years through the experiences and wisdom of sages, saints, philosophers, householders, ascetics and ordinary devotees.

Faith does not always operate according to the grammar of commerce or the cold reasoning of a balance sheet. Devotion cannot be reduced to mathematical equations. The spiritual value of a pilgrimage cannot be calculated merely by dividing its cost by the number of participants. Nor can the importance of a sacred congregation be determined solely by asking what measurable financial return it has produced.

In that context, the reported judicial observation concerning expenditure upon the Kumbh Mela is difficult to accept if it seeks to evaluate the sacred congregation merely from the standpoint of financial utility. Every citizen, including every constitutional authority, undoubtedly possesses the right to raise questions regarding transparency, accountability and lawful utilisation of public funds. However, questioning financial administration is fundamentally different from diminishing the religious, spiritual and civilizational significance of the Kumbh Mela itself.

The Kumbh Mela is not an ordinary festival or a temporary public spectacle. It is one of the greatest and most ancient spiritual congregations in human history. Millions of people voluntarily travel great distances, endure discomfort and participate in the sacred gathering because of their faith. For them, it is not tourism, entertainment or a commercial event; it is a sacred journey of spiritual purification, collective consciousness and civilizational continuity.

The expenditure incurred for such a vast gathering is not confined to religious rituals. It ordinarily includes roads, sanitation, drinking water, medical facilities, public safety, crowd management, transport, disaster preparedness and other infrastructure required to protect millions of citizens. These facilities serve pilgrims, local residents, workers and visitors alike. Therefore, any responsible discussion must distinguish between expenditure upon religious worship and expenditure necessary for public administration, safety and civic infrastructure.

The greatness of Hinduism lies in its extraordinary traditions, moral values, cultural heritage and inclusiveness. It does not compel every person to worship in the same manner. It permits the devotee to approach the Divine through knowledge, devotion, meditation, service, sacrifice or even honest questioning. It accommodates magnificent temples as well as the humble lamp lit beneath a tree. It embraces the learned philosopher and the ordinary villager with equal affection.

Too much attachment to fashionable theories of modernity and rigid material logic can never fully explain this way of life. Modern reasoning has its importance, but it cannot become the exclusive standard for measuring every human emotion, cultural inheritance or spiritual experience. Love, gratitude, sacrifice, patriotism and faith possess values that cannot always be expressed in figures.

Even a poor Hindu family, despite financial hardship, performs Puja according to its capacity. The offering may consist of nothing more than a flower, a little water, a lamp or a handful of rice. Yet the devotion contained in that humble offering may be greater than the monetary value of the most expensive ritual. On the other hand, wealthy devotees may offer kilograms of gold or make substantial donations to temples. Hinduism accommodates both without declaring that devotion is the monopoly of either the rich or the poor.

At countless small roadside temples, Prasadam is distributed freely among passers-by. No one ordinarily asks the recipient about his caste, wealth, profession, political opinion or social status. Very few people ask the name of the person who sponsored the Prasadam or the exact amount donated. The donor gives voluntarily, the temple distributes voluntarily and the passer-by accepts it with gratitude. This quiet cycle of faith, service and sharing has continued for generations without publicity, corporate branding or an expectation of material reward.

This is the social spirit of Hinduism: Dana without arrogance, Seva without discrimination and devotion without compulsion.

Bharat’s civilizational existence has been preserved by her indigenous children, who protected her temples, languages, customs, festivals, philosophies and spiritual traditions through centuries of invasions, persecution and political upheaval. Admittedly, some may have become disconnected or rudderless. Yet the deep cultural memory of Bharat continues to survive in her villages, homes, rivers, pilgrimage routes, festivals and family traditions.

The Supreme Court of India is the guardian of the Constitution and carries the enormous responsibility of deciding issues affecting liberty, equality, governance and the rule of law. Its authority commands respect. At the same time, judicial observations—especially those touching the faith of millions—should reflect constitutional sensitivity, restraint and a complete understanding of the subject. Respect for the judiciary does not require unquestioning agreement with every reported oral observation. Reasoned and dignified disagreement is also part of a constitutional democracy.

When questions are raised regarding expenditure upon religious or cultural gatherings, the same principles of accountability should be applied consistently to every institution and every field of public expenditure. Those who advise society to practise austerity should also be willing to demonstrate personal sacrifice. Moral advice carries greater force when it is accompanied by voluntary example.

Accordingly, instead of commenting selectively upon the expenditure connected with the faith of millions, persons occupying high constitutional positions may inspire the nation by voluntarily contributing a substantial portion of their personal resources towards education, healthcare, legal aid, environmental protection or other programmes of national development. Such an act would transform abstract advice into a living example of sacrifice.

Nevertheless, disagreement must remain dignified. The issue should not be reduced to hostility towards an individual Judge or an attack upon the judiciary as an institution. The proper response is to place facts, constitutional principles and the civilizational importance of the Kumbh Mela before the nation. Constitutional respect and freedom of criticism can coexist, provided criticism remains reasoned, responsible and respectful.

Unfortunately, there appears to be a growing tendency to attract public attention through statements concerning Hindu beliefs and traditions. For some, criticising Hinduism seems to be the easiest route to instant publicity because Hindus have historically responded with patience and tolerance. But tolerance should never be mistaken for intellectual weakness, cultural amnesia or an inability to answer.

Whenever Hindu traditions are criticised without adequate knowledge, we must hold up a mirror—not through hatred, abuse or intimidation, but through history, facts, constitutional reasoning and the strength of our civilizational values. Let the critics first understand the depth of what they seek to judge. Let them study the institution before questioning it, experience the faith before dismissing it and apply the same standards to themselves before prescribing sacrifice to others.

Hinduism does not require the certificate of approval of any individual. It has survived for millennia because it lives in the hearts and conduct of its people. Governments may change, institutions may evolve and intellectual fashions may come and go, but a civilization sustained by faith, service, sacrifice and collective memory cannot be assessed through a corporate balance sheet.

Faith is not a financial transaction.
Devotion is not an investment scheme.
Prasadam is not a commercial dividend.
The Kumbh Mela is not a corporate event.
Hinduism is a living civilization and an eternal way of life.

Let accountability be ensured, but let faith not be trivialised. Let public money be scrutinised, but let sacred traditions not be insulted. Let constitutional institutions be respected, but let reasoned and respectful disagreement never be silenced.

Show the mirror through knowledge, dignity and truth.

Joy Hind. Vande Mataram.

Ashok Kumar Singh
Advocate
High Court at Calcutta

মানবসেবার উজ্জ্বল নক্ষত্র ডাঃ পি. কে. গাঙ্গুলী—আমাদের প্রিয় কানুদার প্রতি বিনম্র শ্রদ্ধাঞ্জলি

 




মানবসেবার উজ্জ্বল নক্ষত্র ডাঃ পি. কে. গাঙ্গুলী—আমাদের প্রিয় কানুদার প্রতি বিনম্র শ্রদ্ধাঞ্জলি

আমাদের সকলের পরম শ্রদ্ধেয়, চিকিৎসাবিজ্ঞানের জগতে এক উজ্জ্বল নক্ষত্র, সঙ্ঘ পরিবারের আদর্শে আদর্শিত, অসহায় ও সাধারণ মানুষের পরম আপনজন, বিশিষ্ট চিকিৎসক ডাঃ পি. কে. গাঙ্গুলী—আমাদের অত্যন্ত প্রিয় ‘কানুদা’—আজ আর আমাদের মধ্যে নেই। তাঁর প্রয়াণে নেতাজীনগরসহ সমগ্র সমাজ হারাল একজন অসাধারণ চিকিৎসককে, আর আমরা হারালাম একজন স্নেহশীল অভিভাবক, নিঃস্বার্থ সমাজসেবক এবং প্রকৃত মানবদরদী মানুষকে।

তাঁর মৃত্যু কেবল একজন চিকিৎসকের জীবনাবসান নয়; এটি মানবিকতা, সহমর্মিতা ও নিঃস্বার্থ সেবার এক জীবন্ত অধ্যায়ের পরিসমাপ্তি। তিনি চিকিৎসাকে কখনো নিছক পেশা বা অর্থ উপার্জনের মাধ্যম হিসেবে দেখেননি। চিকিৎসা তাঁর কাছে ছিল মানুষের পাশে দাঁড়ানোর পবিত্র ব্রত—দুঃস্থের যন্ত্রণা লাঘব করা, অসহায় মানুষকে সাহস দেওয়া এবং রোগীর মুখে সুস্থতার হাসি ফিরিয়ে আনার এক মহৎ সাধনা।

আজীবন মানবসেবায় নিজেকে উৎসর্গ করেছিলেন আমাদের প্রিয় কানুদা। সরকারি হাসপাতালে দীর্ঘকাল সাধারণ মানুষের চিকিৎসায় নিয়োজিত থেকে তিনি অগণিত মানুষের জীবন রক্ষা করেছেন। সমাজের দরিদ্র ও পিছিয়ে পড়া মানুষ তাঁর কাছে কখনো অবহেলিত হননি। তাঁদের আর্থিক সামর্থ্য কতটুকু, তাঁরা চিকিৎসার খরচ বহন করতে পারবেন কি না—এসব বিষয় তাঁর সেবার পথে কোনোদিন বাধা হয়ে দাঁড়ায়নি। রোগীর অসুস্থতা এবং তাঁর চিকিৎসার প্রয়োজনই ছিল কানুদার কাছে সর্বাধিক গুরুত্বপূর্ণ।

তাঁর সেই স্নেহময় কণ্ঠস্বর আজও কানে বাজে—
“আমাকে ভিজিট দিতে হবে না; ওই পয়সায় ছানা খেয়ে নিস, শরীর ভালো থাকবে।”

এই কয়েকটি সাধারণ কথার মধ্যেই লুকিয়ে ছিল তাঁর অসাধারণ হৃদয়ের পরিচয়। একজন চিকিৎসক রোগীকে বিনা পারিশ্রমিকে চিকিৎসা করছেন—এটাই যেখানে বিরল, সেখানে তিনি আবার রোগীকে নিজের ভিজিটের টাকা দিয়ে পুষ্টিকর খাবার খাওয়ার পরামর্শ দিতেন। কারণ তিনি জানতেন, শুধু ওষুধ নয়—সঠিক খাদ্য, যত্ন এবং ভালোবাসাও একজন অসুস্থ মানুষকে সুস্থ করে তোলে।

কতবার দেখা গেছে, বাড়ির গ্রিলের ফাঁক দিয়ে সাদা কাগজে ছোট করে প্রয়োজনীয় ওষুধের নাম লিখে দিয়েছেন। আবার কখনো নিজেই গ্রিলের ফাঁক দিয়ে ওষুধ এগিয়ে দিয়ে স্নেহের সঙ্গে বলেছেন—
“এটা খেয়ে নিস, কিনতে হবে না।”

এই দৃশ্য আজ শুধুই স্মৃতি। কিন্তু সেই ছোট্ট সাদা কাগজে লেখা ওষুধের নাম কিংবা বিনামূল্যে এগিয়ে দেওয়া কয়েকটি ট্যাবলেটের মধ্যে যে অপরিসীম মমতা, মানবিকতা ও আশীর্বাদ মিশে থাকত, তা কোনো অর্থের মাপকাঠিতে পরিমাপ করা সম্ভব নয়। তাঁর চিকিৎসায় ছিল বিজ্ঞানের জ্ঞান; আর তাঁর আচরণে ছিল পিতা, অভিভাবক ও পরম আত্মীয়ের ভালোবাসা।

সাধারণ মানুষের কাছে তিনি শুধু একজন চিকিৎসক ছিলেন না; তিনি ছিলেন তাঁদের নির্ভরতার আশ্রয়, দুর্দিনের ভরসা এবং বিপদের সময়ে সাহসের উৎস। দরিদ্র মানুষের অসহায় মুখে তিনি ঈশ্বরকে দেখতে পেতেন। সেই কারণেই নেতাজীনগরের বহু মানুষের কাছে তিনি ছিলেন একজন “জীবন্ত ভগবান”। কারণ মানুষের জীবন রক্ষা করা, অসহায়কে সাহায্য করা এবং কোনো প্রতিদানের প্রত্যাশা না রেখে মানুষের সেবা করার মধ্যেই তিনি নিজের জীবনের প্রকৃত সার্থকতা খুঁজে পেয়েছিলেন।

তাঁর মধ্যে চিকিৎসকের কঠোর নিয়মানুবর্তিতা যেমন ছিল, তেমনই ছিল কোমল হৃদয়ের অপরিসীম স্নেহ। তাঁর কাছে গিয়ে কোনো মানুষ শুধু ওষুধ নিয়ে ফিরে আসতেন না; সঙ্গে নিয়ে আসতেন মানসিক সাহস, আশ্বাস এবং বেঁচে থাকার নতুন শক্তি। তাঁর একটি স্নেহের কথা, একটি আশ্বাস কিংবা মাথায় রাখা আশীর্বাদের হাত অসুস্থ ও বিপন্ন মানুষকে অনেকখানি সুস্থ করে তুলত।

ব্যক্তিগতভাবে বহুবার তাঁর সান্নিধ্য লাভ করার সৌভাগ্য আমার হয়েছে। তাঁর স্নেহ, ভালোবাসা ও আশীর্বাদ আমার জীবনের অমূল্য সম্পদ হয়ে থাকবে। তাঁর সঙ্গে কাটানো প্রতিটি মুহূর্ত, তাঁর মানবিক আচরণ এবং সাধারণ মানুষের প্রতি তাঁর অকৃত্রিম ভালোবাসা আজীবন আমার স্মৃতিতে অম্লান থাকবে। তাঁর আশীর্বাদ মাথায় নিয়ে আমিও জীবনের শেষ দিন পর্যন্ত সমাজ ও মানুষের সেবায় নিজেকে নিয়োজিত রাখার সংকল্প করছি।

একজন মহৎ মানুষ দেহত্যাগ করলেও তাঁর আদর্শের মৃত্যু হয় না। মানুষের কল্যাণে নিবেদিত তাঁর কর্ম, তাঁর ত্যাগ, তাঁর সহমর্মিতা এবং তাঁর নিঃস্বার্থ সেবার ইতিহাস আমাদের মধ্যে চিরকাল বেঁচে থাকবে। তিনি আমাদের শিখিয়ে গিয়েছেন—মানুষের প্রকৃত পরিচয় তার পদ, অর্থ বা সামাজিক প্রতিষ্ঠায় নয়; মানুষের প্রকৃত পরিচয় প্রকাশ পায় অন্য মানুষের দুঃখে পাশে দাঁড়ানোর মধ্যে।

আসুন, আমরা তাঁর স্মৃতির প্রতি প্রকৃত শ্রদ্ধা জানিয়ে মানবসেবার সেই মহান আদর্শকে নিজেদের জীবনে ধারণ করি। অসহায় মানুষের পাশে দাঁড়াই, বিপন্ন মানুষকে সাহায্য করি এবং মানুষের কল্যাণে আমাদের সামর্থ্য অনুযায়ী কাজ করে যাই। মানবকল্যাণে ডাঃ পি. কে. গাঙ্গুলীর দেখানো পথই হোক আমাদের চলার পথ। তাঁর জীবন ও কর্ম ভবিষ্যৎ প্রজন্মের চিকিৎসক, সমাজসেবী এবং সাধারণ মানুষের কাছে মানবিকতার এক উজ্জ্বল দৃষ্টান্ত হয়ে থাকুক।

প্রিয় কানুদা, আপনার শূন্যস্থান কোনোদিন পূরণ হওয়ার নয়। আপনার স্নেহভরা কণ্ঠস্বর, আপনার আশ্বাস, আপনার চিকিৎসা এবং আপনার মমতাময় উপস্থিতি আমরা প্রতিটি মুহূর্তে অনুভব করব। আপনি শারীরিকভাবে আমাদের মধ্যে না থাকলেও আপনার আদর্শ, স্মৃতি ও আশীর্বাদ আমাদের হৃদয়ে চিরদিন জীবন্ত থাকবে।

যেখানেই থাকুন, ভালো থাকবেন ডাক্তারবাবু।
পরম করুণাময়ের কাছে আপনার বিদেহী আত্মার চিরশান্তি কামনা করি। শোকসন্তপ্ত পরিবার, আত্মীয়স্বজন, সহকর্মী, গুণমুগ্ধ ও অগণিত রোগীর প্রতি জানাই আমার গভীর সমবেদনা।

ওঁ শান্তিঃ শান্তিঃ শান্তিঃ।

বিনম্র শ্রদ্ধায়
অশোক কুমার সিংহ
অ্যাডভোকেট
হাইকোর্ট, কলকাতা

JOINT AFFIDAVIT ON BEHALF OF ACCUSED NOS. 2, 3 AND 4 IN SUPPORT OF THEIR WRITTEN OBJECTION TO THE STATE’S APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF AD-INTERIM BAIL

 

DISTRICT: NORTH 24-PARGANAS

IN THE COURT OF THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

AT BIDHANNAGAR

NORTH 24 PARGANAS

 

G.R. No. 230 of 2025

Arising out of Bidhannagar Women Police Station Case No. 06 of 2025

dated 01.03.2025

Under Sections 385/506/509/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860

(with subsequently added Sections 419/420/465/467/468/471/109/118/120 IPC)

 

State of West Bengal   

               ...Prosecution

Versus

Ms. Rina Paladhi & Others    

               ...Accused Persons

 

 

JOINT AFFIDAVIT ON BEHALF OF ACCUSED NOS. 2, 3 AND 4

IN SUPPORT OF THEIR WRITTEN OBJECTION TO THE STATE’S APPLICATION

FOR CANCELLATION OF AD-INTERIM BAIL

 

We, the following deponents;

1. Debojita Chatterjee Chakraborty, wife of Arnab Chakraborty, aged about 32 years, by faith Hindu, by occupation Service, residing at Chhota Jagulia, North 24-Parganas, Pin - 743294, being Accused No. 2 / Deponent No. 1;

2. Gopa Paul, daughter of Gobinda Paul, aged about 32 years, by faith Hindu, by occupation Service, residing at Panihati (M), Sodepur, North 24-Parganas, Pin - 700110, being Accused No. 3 / Deponent No. 2;

3. Piyali Roy, wife of Kalyan Roy, aged about 39 years, by faith Hindu, by occupation Service, residing at Baybreeze Apartment, Flat No. 2, 937 Nayanad, Mukundapur, Sonarpur, South 24-Parganas, Kolkata - 700099, being Accused No. 4 / Deponent No. 3;

do hereby jointly and severally solemnly affirm and state as follows;

1.  That we are accused nos. 2, 3 and 4 respectively in the above-mentioned proceeding. We are fully acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case, competent to affirm this affidavit, and duly authorised to affirm the same jointly in support of our written objection to the State’s application under Section 480(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

2.  That on 13.03.2025 we voluntarily surrendered before this Learned Court and prayed for bail. Upon hearing the parties and perusing the formal FIR, written complaint and the materials then produced, this Learned Court was pleased to record that our custodial detention was not necessary and granted us ad-interim bail of Rs.1,000/- each with one registered surety of the like amount.

4.  That we duly furnished the bail bonds and have remained subject to the jurisdiction of this Learned Court. We have regularly made ourselves available to the judicial process and have neither evaded nor attempted to evade the due course of justice.

5.  That after being released on bail, none of us has violated any condition of bail, absconded, failed to cooperate with the investigation, approached or intimidated any witness, interfered with the administration of justice, tampered with any document or evidence, or committed any further offence. The State’s application does not specify any such post-bail misconduct.

6.  That the State seeks cancellation principally on the ground that graver provisions of the IPC were subsequently added. We state that the subsequent addition or alteration of penal provisions does not amount to any act or omission on our part and cannot, by itself, constitute abuse of the liberty granted to us.

7.  That by order dated 30.04.2026 this Learned Court disposed of the de facto complainant’s application dated 13.06.2025 pursuant to the direction of the Hon’ble High Court at Calcutta dated 17.04.2026. The said order allowed monitoring/further investigation on the aspect of the appropriate penal provisions and directed the Investigating Officer to proceed with the investigation “as per law”.

8.  That the order dated 30.04.2026 did not cancel, suspend or modify our ad-interim bail dated 13.03.2025; did not direct our arrest or surrender; did not record our guilt or any prima facie finding that we committed the subsequently added offences; and did not record any violation of bail or obstruction of investigation on our part. The matter was fixed on 30.06.2026 for our appearance and for hearing the applications filed by the accused persons other than accused no. 1.

9.  That the observation in the order dated 30.04.2026 that an aspect concerning the provisions of law had not been properly investigated is a direction governing the scope of investigation. It is not a finding as to the result of such investigation and cannot be treated as proof of any allegation against us.

10.  That the documents referred to by the State, including the Indian Nursing Council letter dated 22.07.2022, emails of May 2024 and documents relied upon in connection with CRR No. 1793 of 2025, relate to a period preceding the grant of bail. Investigation into such pre-existing materials does not amount to any supervening conduct by us.

11.  That the accusations are substantially documentary and institutional in nature. The relevant letters, emails and institutional records have either been obtained or are capable of being obtained from independent bodies. We have not destroyed, altered, concealed or withheld any record from the Investigating Officer.

12.  That we deny the allegations of forgery, cheating, personation, conspiracy, abetment, concealment, extortion and criminal intimidation made against us. The mere addition of penal provisions is not proof of the essential ingredients of any alleged offence, and all our rights and contentions on facts and law are expressly reserved.

13.  That cancellation of bail already granted stands on a footing distinct from rejection of bail at the initial stage. In the absence of any misuse of liberty, supervening circumstance or legally sustainable challenge to the order granting bail, our continued detention is neither necessary nor justified.

14.  That we undertake to continue to cooperate with the investigation, to appear before this Learned Court and the Investigating Officer as and when lawfully directed, not to influence any witness or tamper with evidence, and to comply with every reasonable condition that this Learned Court may impose.

15.  That, without prejudice to our prayer for rejection of the State’s cancellation application and confirmation of our bail, we are ready to furnish fresh or additional bail bonds and comply with any further reasonable condition concerning the subsequently added provisions, instead of being directed into custody.

16.  That the statements made in the accompanying written objection may be treated as part of this affidavit. The submissions of law contained therein are based on advice received from our learned Advocate, which advice we believe to be true and correct.

 

 

 

 

We, Debojita Chatterjee Chakraborty, Gopa Paul and Piyali Roy, the three deponents above named, do hereby jointly verify that the statements made in paragraphs 1 to 16 are true to our respective knowledge and belief, derived from the case records and legal advice received; that the submissions of law are based on advice which we believe to be true; and that no material fact has been concealed therefrom.

Verified at Bidhannagar, North 24-Parganas, on this ____ day of August, 2026.

 

_______________________________

Debojita Chatterjee Chakraborty
Accused No. 2 / Deponent No. 1

 

_______________________________

Gopa Paul
Accused No. 3 / Deponent No. 2

 

_______________________________

Piyali Roy
Accused No. 4 / Deponent No. 3

Identified by me:

Advocate

Notary

WRITTEN OBJECTION ON BEHALF OF ACCUSED NOS. 2, 3 AND 4 AGAINST THE STATE’S APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 480(5) OF THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 FOR CANCELLATION OF AD-INTERIM BAIL GRANTED ON 13.03.2025

 

DISTRICT: NORTH 24-PARGANAS

IN THE COURT OF THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

AT BIDHANNAGAR

NORTH 24 PARGANAS

 

G.R. No. 230 of 2025

Arising out of Bidhannagar Women Police Station Case No. 06 of 2025

dated 01.03.2025

Under Sections 385/506/509/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860

(with subsequently added Sections 419/420/465/467/468/471/109/118/120 IPC)

 

State of West Bengal

...Prosecution

Versus
Ms. Rina Paladhi & Others

 

...Accused Persons

WRITTEN OBJECTION ON BEHALF OF ACCUSED NOS. 2, 3 AND 4

AGAINST THE STATE’S APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 480(5) OF THE

BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 FOR CANCELLATION OF

AD-INTERIM BAIL GRANTED ON 13.03.2025

 

The accused nos. 2, 3 and 4 above named most respectfully submit this written objection to the application filed by the State seeking cancellation of the ad-interim bail granted to them by this Learned Court on 13.03.2025, and state as follows;

 

1. The application for cancellation is wholly misconceived, unsupported by any post-bail misconduct and liable to be rejected. The State does not allege even a single breach of any bail condition, failure to appear, attempt to abscond, non-cooperation with the investigation, intimidation of any witness, interference with the course of justice, or tampering with any document after the order dated 13.03.2025.

 

2. The only ground urged by the State is that, during the subsequent investigation, Sections 419/420/465/467/468/471/109/118/120 IPC have been added and some of those offences are described as serious. A later alteration or addition of penal sections may require the Court to consider the procedural consequences in accordance with law, but it does not retrospectively convert a lawfully granted bail into misconduct, nor does it automatically satisfy the stringent test for cancellation under Section 480(5) BNSS.

 

3. Cancellation of bail already granted stands on a footing materially different from rejection of bail at the initial stage. The jurisdiction is not appellate or review jurisdiction over the earlier order. Liberty once granted cannot be withdrawn merely upon a re-appreciation of the same accusation or because the prosecution has subsequently adopted a graver legal characterisation of substantially the same factual narrative.

 

4. The FIR was registered on 01.03.2025 under Sections 385/506/509/120B IPC upon allegations arising out of the de facto complainant’s prior employment at the College and School of Nursing, Techno India University, West Bengal, and allegations relating to communications and institutional records dating principally from May 2024.

 

5. On 13.03.2025, accused nos. 2, 3 and 4 voluntarily surrendered before this Learned Court. Upon hearing the parties and perusing the formal FIR, written complaint and the materials then produced, this Learned Court expressly recorded that custodial detention was not necessary and granted each accused ad-interim bail of Rs.1,000/- with one registered surety of the like amount.

 

6. The accused persons accepted the jurisdiction of this Learned Court, furnished bail bonds and have remained available to the process. Their prayer for confirmation of bail has remained before this Learned Court. The State’s present application does not disclose any circumstance showing that the accused have abused the protection granted to them.

 

7. By order dated 30.04.2026, this Learned Court disposed of the de facto complainant’s application dated 13.06.2025 in terms of the direction of the Hon’ble High Court dated 17.04.2026. The order permitted monitoring/further investigation on the question of the appropriate penal provisions and directed the Investigating Officer to proceed as per law. It did not cancel or vary the bail of accused nos. 2, 3 and 4, direct their custody, record their guilt, or find any post-bail misconduct. The matter was fixed on 30.06.2026 for their appearance and hearing of their pending applications.

 

8. The order dated 30.04.2026 records that, by an earlier order dated 31.10.2025, this Learned Court had rejected the applications of the de facto complainant and the prosecution seeking monitoring of the investigation and addition of sections. It further records that the de facto complainant thereafter preferred a criminal revision before the Hon’ble High Court at Calcutta and that, by order dated 17.04.2026, the Hon’ble High Court directed this Learned Court to dispose of the de facto complainant’s application dated 13.06.2025 before proceeding further with the case.

 

9. The order further clarifies that the earlier order dated 31.10.2025 had been passed not on the merits of the de facto complainant’s request, but because accused no. 1 had preferred CRR No. 1793 of 2025 for quashing of the proceeding and had obtained protection against coercive action. Consequently, the application dated 13.06.2025 was taken up on merits pursuant to the High Court’s procedural direction.

 

10. Upon perusing the High Court’s order, the record and the case diary, this Learned Court observed that the aspect concerning the provisions of law, as ventilated by the de facto complainant and the prosecution, did not appear to have been properly investigated and that such omission might prejudice the de facto complainant. On that limited basis, the prayer for monitoring of investigation in relation to the relief sought in the application dated 13.06.2025 was allowed, and the Investigating Officer was directed to proceed with the investigation “as per law”.

 

11. Significantly, the order dated 30.04.2026 is an order governing the manner and scope of investigation. It neither adjudicates the truth of the allegations nor records a prima facie finding that accused nos. 2, 3 and 4 committed the subsequently added offences. The expression that an aspect had not been properly investigated is a direction to investigate; it is not proof of the result of that investigation.

 

 

12. The order also does not record that accused nos. 2, 3 and 4 violated any bail condition or obstructed the investigation. It does not direct their arrest or surrender and does not cancel, suspend or modify the ad-interim bail dated 13.03.2025. On the contrary, it fixes 30.06.2026 for their appearance and for hearing the applications filed by them, except accused no. 1. The continuation of their applications for hearing is inconsistent with the State’s attempt to portray the order itself as an automatic cancellation event.

 

13. The State’s subsequent reliance on the order dated 30.04.2026 must therefore remain confined to its true scope. The order authorised a lawful investigation into possible additional provisions; it did not dispense with the independent statutory test under Section 480(5) BNSS. Any material collected thereafter may be investigated and tested in accordance with law, but cancellation still requires cogent grounds relating to the legality of the bail order or abuse of liberty, neither of which is pleaded.

 

14. The materials now relied upon by the State, including the Indian Nursing Council letter dated 22.07.2022, emails of May 2024 and documents annexed in CRR No. 1793 of 2025, all relate to a period preceding the grant of bail. Their investigation pursuant to the order dated 30.04.2026 cannot convert them into supervening conduct on the part of the accused.

 

15. With reference to paragraph 1 of the State’s application, the registration of the FIR and the broad narration of allegations are matters of record. Save and except what is expressly admitted herein, every allegation, inference and legal conclusion against these accused is denied. The prosecution is put to strict proof of each ingredient of every alleged offence.

 

16. With reference to paragraph 2, it is admitted that accused nos. 2, 3 and 4 surrendered on 13.03.2025 and were granted ad-interim bail. It is submitted that the order was passed judicially after consideration of the FIR, written complaint and available materials, with the specific finding that custodial detention was unnecessary.

 

17. With reference to paragraphs 3(a) to 3(h), the State has reproduced and expanded the de facto complainant’s theory but has not identified the particular allegedly forged document, its maker, date, original source, signature or seal said to be false, the person deceived, or the property actually delivered by reason of deception. The correctness of the added sections is a matter for investigation and, if a police report is filed, for consideration at the appropriate stage; allegations cannot be treated as established facts in a cancellation proceeding.

 

18. In particular, a charge of cheating by personation under Section 419 IPC requires the statutory ingredients of personation; a mere allegation that employment or faculty status was misrepresented does not, without particulars, establish that an accused pretended to be another person. Likewise, whether any particular appointment or relieving document answers the statutory definition of “valuable security”, and whether any permission or approval was “property” delivered because of deception, are mixed questions of fact and law which the State has merely asserted.

 

19. With reference to paragraphs 4 to 8, the alleged conspiracy, abetment and concealment are denied. The omnibus use of Sections 109, 118, 120 and 120B IPC cannot substitute for specific factual particulars showing agreement, intentional aid, knowledge of a criminal design or voluntary concealment. The mere addition of these provisions by the Investigating Officer is neither proof of guilt nor proof that continued liberty would prejudice the investigation.

 

20. With reference to paragraph 9, the Indian Nursing Council letter dated 22.07.2022, even if taken at face value, only records an institutional issue concerning simultaneous working and refusal to extend suitability. It does not, by itself, identify which accused created which false document, nor does it establish the essential mens rea for forgery, personation or cheating. It predates the bail order and supplies no ground of post-bail misuse.

 

21. With reference to paragraphs 10 and 11, exchange or forwarding of emails in May 2024 cannot, without more, establish a criminal conspiracy. As regards accused no. 4, the allegation is essentially that she prepared a report and transmitted declarations in the discharge of an institutional role. No overt act of forgery, extortion, threat or personal gain has been particularised against her. All such communications predate the FIR and were capable of investigation without taking the accused into custody.

 

22. With reference to paragraph 12 and the prayer, seriousness of an accusation is relevant but cannot be the sole basis for cancellation of bail already enjoyed without misuse. The State’s own application records that the originally alleged offences were “not serious in nature” and bases the cancellation prayer exclusively on the subsequently added sections. Such addition, unaccompanied by any allegation of obstruction or breach, does not meet the settled threshold for cancellation.

 

23. In Dolat Ram v. State of Haryana, (1995) 1 SCC 349, the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that very cogent and overwhelming circumstances are necessary for cancellation of bail already granted, and identified interference with the due course of administration of justice, evasion or attempt to evade justice, and abuse of the concession granted as material considerations.

 

24. In Puran v. Rambilas, (2001) 6 SCC 338, the Hon’ble Supreme Court explained that bail may be set aside where the grant itself is perverse, illegal or made by ignoring material of substantial nature; that principle does not authorise routine cancellation merely because the prosecution subsequently advances a more severe formulation of the accusation.

 

25. In Abdul Basit alias Raju v. Mohd. Abdul Kadir Chaudhary, (2014) 10 SCC 754, the Hon’ble Supreme Court reiterated that the court granting bail cannot review its own order and that cancellation requires supervening circumstances or misuse, while a challenge to an unjustified bail order lies before a superior forum.

 

26. In Myakala Dharmarajam v. State of Telangana, (2020) 2 SCC 743, the Hon’ble Supreme Court reaffirmed that cancellation requires cogent and overwhelming circumstances, such as evasion of justice, interference with investigation, intimidation of witnesses, likelihood of absconding or abuse of bail. No such circumstance is pleaded here.

 

27. The above principles have been consistently restated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, including in Imran v. Mohammed Bhava, (2022) 11 SCC 695: bail once granted ought not to be cancelled in a mechanical manner, and the distinction between an appeal against an unjustified grant and cancellation for subsequent misconduct must be maintained.

 

28. The State does not challenge the order dated 13.03.2025 before a superior court as perverse or illegal. Instead, it invokes Section 480(5) BNSS before the same Learned Court while disclosing no abuse of liberty. The application therefore impermissibly seeks a review of the earlier assessment under the label of cancellation.

 

29. All alleged acts relate to 2022-May 2024 and are documentary or institutional in nature. The FIR followed on 01.03.2025. The accused surrendered on 13.03.2025 and have remained on bail for a substantial period. No fresh offence or untoward incident after release is alleged. The prolonged, unblemished compliance itself weighs strongly against incarceration.

 

30. The evidence described by the State consists principally of letters, emails, institutional records and documents already obtained or obtainable from independent bodies. The State does not identify any document destroyed, altered or withheld after bail, any witness approached by the accused, or any investigative direction disobeyed by them. Custodial detention is therefore neither shown to be necessary nor proportionate.

 

31. The presumption of innocence continues. Cancellation at this stage solely because a penal provision carrying a higher punishment has been added would convert the label of an offence into a substitute for the judicial test and would inflict pre-trial detention without a demonstrated necessity.

 

32. Without prejudice, if this Learned Court considers that the addition of any non-bailable offence calls for a fresh bond, additional condition, appearance before the Investigating Officer, or a formal application concerning the added sections, these accused are ready and willing to comply with every reasonable direction. Such safeguards would fully protect the investigation and constitute a proportionate alternative to cancellation.

 

In the premises aforesaid, it is most respectfully prayed that this Learned Court may graciously be pleased to;

 

(a) reject and/or dismiss the application filed by the State under Section 480(5) BNSS for cancellation of the ad-interim bail granted to accused nos. 2, 3 and 4 on 13.03.2025;

 

(b) confirm and continue the bail of accused nos. 2, 3 and 4 upon the existing terms and conditions;

 

(c) in the alternative and without prejudice, permit the accused persons to furnish fresh or additional bail bonds and/or impose such reasonable conditions as may be necessary in relation to the added penal sections, instead of directing them into custody; and

 

(d) pass such further order or orders as this Learned Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.

 

And for this act of kindness, the accused persons as in duty bound shall ever pray.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Place: Bidhannagar

Accused No. 2

Date: ____/____/2026

Accused No. 3

Accused No. 4

 

 

VERIFICATION

 

We, Debojita Chatterjee Chakraborty, Gopa Paul, & Piyali Biswas, accused no. 2, 3, & 4, in the above-mentioned case, do hereby verify that the statements made in paragraphs 1 to 26 are true to my knowledge and belief, based on the case records and legal advice received, and that I have not suppressed any material fact.

 

Verified at Bidhannagar on this ____ day of ____________, 2026.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deponent / Accused

Identified by me,

 

Advocate