Saturday, May 10, 2025

Legal Notice

 

 

By Registered Post / Speed Post / Ordinary Post

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 

Ref.: SS / DKG / 3108-9219 / 25                 Dated : 2nd day of May’ 2025

 

To,

 

1.   M/s. ABS Land Development & Construction Private Limited, a Private Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its Registered Office at Premises being no. 13/B, Jatin Das Road, Police Station – Tollygunge, Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal.

 

2.   Sri Tapan Ghosh, Son of Late P.L. Ghosh, residing at Premises being no. 13/B, Jatin Das Road, Police Station – Tollygunge, Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal.

 

3.   Sri Tapan Ghosh, Director of M/s. ABS Land Development & Construction Private Limited, a Private Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its Registered Office at Premises being no. 13/B, Jatin Das Road, Police Station – Tollygunge, Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal.

 

 

4.   Sk. Mokbul Hossain, Son of Sk. Yousuf Ali, Director of M/s. ABS Land Development & Construction Private Limited, a Private Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its Registered Office at Premises being no. 13/B, Jatin Das Road, Police Station – Tollygunge, Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal.

 

5.   Sri Abhijit Chowdhury, Son of Chitta Ranjan Chowdhury, residing at Premises being no. G 108, Baghajatin, Police Station – Patuli, Kolkata – 700086, District South 24 Parganas.

 

6.   Sri Abhijit Chowdhury, Director of M/s. ABS Land Development & Construction Private Limited, a Private Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its Registered Office at Premises being no. 13/B, Jatin Das Road, Police Station – Tollygunge, Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ref.: Agreement for Sale dated 15th day of August’ 2007;

 

My Client : Dr. Dhiraj Kumar Giri, Son of Amyya Ratan Giri, residing at 162, Banamali Ghosal Lane, Kolkata - 700034.

 

Legal Notice

Dear Sir/s,

 

Under instructions of my Client Dr. Dhiraj Kumar Giri, Son of Amyya Ratan Giri, residing at 162, Banamali Ghosal Lane, Kolkata - 700034, do hereby states as follows;

 

1.   You allured my client with your alleged township project under the name and style of “Pailan City II”, which was scheduled to be completed in all respects by the 31st day of December, 2010, including the demarcation and handing over of possession thereof to the intending allottees/purchasers. The said township project “Pailan City II” was purportedly to consist of 674 plots of various sizes, which you claimed had been earmarked and demarcated. Since my client was in search of a plot of land for the residential use of his family, he was attracted by your representations and assurances and accordingly have interest in the said project. Relying upon your commitments, advertisements, brochures, and verbal representations, my client applied for a plot, made necessary payments, and was issued an allotment confirmation.

 

 

 

 

 

2.   You entered into an Agreement for Sale dated 15th day of August’ 2007, with my client for the Sale of Land with all amenities as (i) Plot no. 3, (ii) Plot no. 6, (iii) Plot no.7, Plot no. 10, (iv) Plot no. 11, and (v) Plot no. 14, which are measuring about 12960 sq. ft. (i.e. 2160 Sq. ft. X 6) under Pailan Coty II, lying and situated at District South 24 Parganas, under the Jurisdiction of Bishnupur (East) Gram Panchayat, Mouza – Bagi, J.L. No. 78, Khatian No. 503, Dag No. 703, Police Station Bishnupur, District South 24 Parganas, at a total consideration price of Rs. 21,24,000/- (Rupees Twenty One Lakhs and Twenty Four Thousand) only, being Rs. 3,54,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs and Fifty Four Thousand) only, for each Plot of Land.

 

3.   The said Agreement for Sale dated 15th day of August’ 2007, containing some specified terms and conditions, which refurnished as follows;

 

(a)  Paragraph no. 1 at page no. 3 of the said agreement for sale dated 15th day of August’ 2007, states as “That the party of the Second Part herein being the Allottee/ Purchaser has agreed to purchase the residential plot of land in Company’s said project “Pailan City II” being Plot nos. 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14 as shown in the Company’s master plan, which may be inspected at the Company’s sales office, hereto measuring about 12960 sq. ft. is free from all encumbrances and has a clear and good marketable title, lying and situated in the District South 24-Parganas under the jurisdiction of Bishnupur (East) Gram Panchayat area Police Station Bishnupur, Mouza – Bagi, J.L. No. 78, Khatian No. 503, appertaining to Dag No. 703, morefully and particularly described in the Schedule “B” hereunder written at a total consideration of Rs. 21,24,000/- (Rupees Twenty One Lacs Twenty Four Thousand) only and the company, the party of the First Part herein has also agreed to sell/ transfer of the said plot of land to the said Allottee/ Purchaser under the condition mentioned herein below”.

 

(b)  Paragraph no. 4 at page no. 4 of the said agreement for sale dated 15th day of August’ 2007, states as “That the Company, the First Part herein shall complete the sale in respect of the said plots of land in the Project Pailan City II, directly by registered Deed of Conveyance, upon completion the Project and payment of entire consideration and upon expiry of the terms of this Agreement having demarcated the said plots of land and development of the said plots of land and connecting Road or Pathway attached to the Plot”.

 

(c)  Paragraph no. 5 at page no. 4 of the said agreement for sale dated 15th day of August’ 2007, states as “That the said entire area of land under the said Project including the said plots of land fully described in Schedule “B” written hereunder is free from all encumbrances and has a clear and good marketable title”.

 

(d)  Paragraph no. 11 at page no. 5 of the said agreement for sale dated 15th day of August’ 2007, states as “That the Allottee/ Purchaser, the party of the second part herein shall be provided with the said plots of land the necessary facilities fully described in the Schedule “C” hereunder written”.

 

(e)  Paragraph no. 16 at page no. 6 of the said agreement for sale dated 15th day of August’ 2007, states as “That if any disputes cropped up between the parties on that event both parties shall solve the disputes amicable by maintaining balance of both parties”.

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.   That my Client has paid the entire consideration money in terms of the said Agreement for Sale dated 15th day of August’ 2007, to you against the receipt and acknowledgement thereof. Which you have apportioned within the stipulated period assigned under the said Agreement for Sale dated 15th day of August’ 2007. Pertinently, my client booked such plot of land on 16/10/2006, subsequently, substantial money has been paid at your persuasion about the alleged plot of land with all amenities thereof and thus the said Agreement for Sale dated 15th day of August’ 2007, has been made and drafted by you and your Learned Advocate.

 

5.   That the period of 48 (Forty Eight) months as stipulated in the said Agreement for Sale dated 15th day of August’ 2007, has been elapsed by 15th day of August’ 2011, and even after on receipt of the entire consideration money, you did not deliver the physical possession of the residential plot of land in Company’s said project “Pailan City II” being Plot nos. 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14 as shown in the Company’s master plan, which may be inspected at the Company’s sales office, hereto measuring about 12960 sq. ft. is free from all encumbrances and has a clear and good marketable title, lying and situated in the District South 24-Parganas under the jurisdiction of Bishnupur (East) Gram Panchayat area Police Station Bishnupur, Mouza – Bagi, J.L. No. 78, Khatian No. 503, appertaining to Dag No. 703, District South 24 Parganas, and did not even pursue yourself to refund my client’s money. Rather, time and again, you assured my client for delivery of physical possession being Schedule plot of Land assigned in the said Agreement for Sale dated 1st day of June’ 2012, though nothing materialized till the day, writing this Letter to you.

 

 

 

 

 

6.   That Since a substantial period of 13 years 8 months 18 day has been elapsed sustaining belief on you by my client, truly realized that you will not deliver any physical possession of the schedule plot of land nor refund the money apportioned by you. Breach of Contract truly sustained at your behest with the continuous false assurance, causing immense mental agony, harassment, and financial loss to my Client. My Client has waited patiently for almost a decade, relying on your repeated promises and representations which have now proven to be false and fraudulent in nature. Your conduct constitutes a gross breach of contractual obligations, misrepresentation, unfair trade practice, and amounts to cheating and criminal breach of trust.

 

7.   It is also pertinent to mention that your continued failure to fulfill the contractual obligations, despite repeated follow-ups and your express assurances, not only constitutes a clear breach of the terms of the agreement but also amounts to unfair trade practice as defined under Section 2(47) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. You have lured my Client into a real estate transaction with promises of timely possession, only to default on the same without reasonable justification.

 

8.   Furthermore, your actions amount to a violation of the RERA and related regulations, which mandate timely completion and delivery of real estate projects. Despite having received almost the entire consideration amount from my Client, you have neither handed over possession nor refunded the amount with interest. This suggests clear deficiency in service and negligence on your part.

 

 

 

 

9.   It is also relevant to note that the Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) and various High Courts have consistently held that failure to deliver possession of a property within a reasonable time entitles the purchaser either to possession along with compensation or to a full refund with interest. My Client reserves the right to rely upon such judicial precedents in support of his claim.

 

10.        The inordinate delay in handing over possession, despite full or substantial payment being made, clearly reflects your intention to defeat the rights of genuine buyers like my Client, which may also invite prosecution under Sections 318, 316, and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for cheating, criminal breach of trust, and conspiracy.

 

11.        The breach is not curable at this stage without causing further injustice to my Client. The law provides that in case of breach by one party, the non-defaulting party is entitled to seek rescission of the contract and claim damages or refund. Given your continued default, my Client is within his rights to demand a full refund along with interest and take appropriate legal recourse against you

 

In the circumstances stated hereinabove, I, on behalf of my Client, do hereby call upon you:

 

a)     To immediately deliver peaceful, vacant, and physical possession of the residential plot of land in Company’s said project “Pailan City II” being Plot nos. 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14 as shown in the Company’s master plan, which may be inspected at the Company’s sales office, hereto measuring about 12960 sq. ft. is free from all encumbrances and has a clear and good marketable title, lying and situated in the District South 24-Parganas under the jurisdiction of Bishnupur (East) Gram Panchayat area Police Station Bishnupur, Mouza – Bagi, J.L. No. 78, Khatian No. 503, appertaining to Dag No. 703, along with all promised amenities as per the Agreement for Sale dated 15th August’ 2007 within 15 (fifteen) days from the date of receipt of this Legal Notice;

 

OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE,

 

b)     To refund the entire consideration amount of Rs. 21,24,000/- (Rupees Twenty One Lakhs and Twenty Four Thousand Only) paid by my Client, along with interest calculated at the prevailing rate applicable to banking recurring deposits, compounded annually, from the date of respective payments made till actual realization, the payments of which shall be payable within 15 (fifteen) days from the receipt of this notice;

 

And

 

c)      To compensate my Client for the mental agony, harassment, and financial loss suffered due to your breach, by paying an amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Only) within the same period;

 

And

 

d)     To bear all legal and incidental costs incurred by my Client in pursuing this matter, including legal notice charges, to the extent of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand Only).

 

e)      Failing which, my Client shall be constrained to initiate appropriate civil and criminal proceedings, including but not limited to a suit for specific performance, damages, recovery of money, and/or criminal complaint under relevant provisions of the BNS’ 2023 and the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, entirely at your risk, cost, and consequence.

 

f)       Please take this as a final opportunity to amicably resolve the matter within the stipulated time.

 

This notice is issued without prejudice to my Client’s rights and remedies, available under law and in equity.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

 

Sanjib Saha

Advocate

High Court Calcutta

 

 

 

 

Demand Notice

 

 

By Registered Post / Speed Post / Ordinary Post

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 

Ref.: SS / N&DKG / 3108-9283 / 25            Dated : 2nd day of May’ 2025

 

To,

 

1.   M/s. ABS Land Development & Construction Private Limited, a Private Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its Registered Office at Premises being no. 13/B, Jatin Das Road, Police Station – Tollygunge, Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal.

 

2.   Sri Tapan Ghosh, Son of Late P.L. Ghosh, residing at Premises being no. 13/B, Jatin Das Road, Police Station – Tollygunge, Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal.

 

3.   Sri Tapan Ghosh, Director of M/s. ABS Land Development & Construction Private Limited, a Private Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its Registered Office at Premises being no. 13/B, Jatin Das Road, Police Station – Tollygunge, Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal.

 

 

4.   Sri Abhijit Chowdhury, Son of Chitta Ranjan Chowdhury, residing at Premises being no. G 108, Baghajatin, Police Station – Patuli, Kolkata – 700086, District South 24 Parganas.

 

5.   Sri Abhijit Chowdhury, Director of M/s. ABS Land Development & Construction Private Limited, a Private Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its Registered Office at Premises being no. 13/B, Jatin Das Road, Police Station – Tollygunge, Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal.

 

Ref.: Acknowledgment of receipt of a sum of Rs. 1,05,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore and Five Lakhs) only, by M/s. ABS Land Development & Construction Private Limited;

 

My Client : Smt. Nilima Giri, & Sri Dhiraj Kumar Giri, residing at Premises being no. 162, Banamali Ghosal Lane, Post Office & Police Station Behala, Kolkata – 700034, District South 24 Parganas.

 

 

 

Demand Notice for a sum of Rs. 1,05,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore and Five Lakhs) only, along with applicable interest thereon, till realization.

 

Dear Sir/s,

 

Under instructions of my Clients Smt. Nilima Giri, & Sri Dhiraj Kumar Giri, residing at Premises being no. 162, Banamali Ghosal Lane, Post Office & Police Station Behala, Kolkata – 700034, District South 24 Parganas, do hereby states as follows;

 

1.   That my clients have paid to you a total sum of Rs. 1,05,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore and Five Lakhs Only) between the year 2006 to December 2014, in several installments, against your assurance of selling a total area of 3 (Three) Bighas and 6 (Six) Cottahas of land, more or less, situated at Mouzas – Bhasa and Bagi, under Dag Nos. 629, 277, and 278, within your so-called “Pailan City Project”.

 

2.   That you have duly acknowledged the receipt of the said payments under your seal and signature and assured my clients of your sincere intent to execute and register the Deed of Conveyance in respect of the said land in their favour.

 

3.   That from time to time you requested my clients to wait, citing temporary inconvenience, and assured them repeatedly that the registration of the said land would be completed at the earliest.

 

4.   That despite your repeated assurances, you failed, neglected and avoided executing and registering the said Deed of Conveyance within the committed period of November 2015, and continue to delay the same without just or lawful cause.

 

 

 

5.   That my clients, having waited patiently for over a decade, now demand that you refund the entire sum of Rs. 1,05,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore and Five Lakhs Only) along with prevailing banking interest from the date of last payment till full realization, within 15 (Fifteen) days from the date of receipt of this notice.

 

6.   TAKE NOTICE, that unless you make payment of the aforesaid amount being Rs. 1,05,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore and Five Lakhs) only, along with interest within the stipulated period, my clients shall be constrained to take appropriate civil and criminal legal action against all of you jointly and severally, including but not limited to filing of suit for recovery, proceedings under the Consumer Protection Act, and initiation of criminal proceedings for cheating and criminal breach of trust, entirely at your risk, cost and consequences.

 

7.   This is your final opportunity to amicably resolve the matter and avoid the rigors of protracted litigation.

 

8.   This notice is issued without prejudice to my Clients’ rights and remedies, available under law and in equity.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

 

Sanjib Saha

Advocate

High Court Calcutta

Demand Notice

 

 

By Registered Post / Speed Post / Ordinary Post

 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 

                                                                      Dated : 2nd day of May’ 2025

 

To,

 

1.   Sri Abhijit Chowdhury, Son of Chitta Ranjan Chowdhury, residing at Premises being no. G 108, Baghajatin, Police Station – Patuli, Kolkata – 700086, District South 24 Parganas.

 

2.   Sri Abhijit Chowdhury, Director of M/s. ABS Land Development & Construction Private Limited, a Private Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its Registered Office at Premises being no. 13/B, Jatin Das Road, Police Station – Tollygunge, Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal.

 

3.   M/s. ABS Land Development & Construction Private Limited, a Private Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, having its Registered Office at Premises being no. 13/B, Jatin Das Road, Police Station – Tollygunge, Kolkata – 700029, West Bengal.

 

Ref.: Acknowledgment of receipt of a sum of Rs. 65,000/- (Rupees Sixty Five Thousand) only, by Sri Abhijit Chowdhury, Son of Chitta Ranjan Chowdhury, residing at Premises being no. G 108, Baghajatin, Police Station – Patuli, Kolkata – 700086, District South 24 Parganas;

 

My Client : Sri Dhiraj Kumar Giri, Son of Amulya Ratan Giri, residing at Premises being no. 162, Banamali Ghosal Lane, Post Office & Police Station Behala, Kolkata – 700034, District South 24 Parganas.

 

 

Demand Notice for a sum of Rs. 65,000/- (Rupees Sixty Five Thousand) only, along with applicable interest thereon, till realization.

 

Dear Sir/s,

 

Under instructions of my Client Sri Dhiraj Kumar Giri, Son of Amulya Ratan Giri, residing at Premises being no. 162, Banamali Ghosal Lane, Post Office & Police Station Behala, Kolkata – 700034, District South 24 Parganas, do hereby states as follows;

 

 

 

1.      That on 05/11/2022, you, Sri Abhijit Chowdhury, borrowed a sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) from my Client for your personal dire emergency, with a solemn assurance to refund the same within a period of two months from the said date.

 

2.      That again, on 24/11/2022, you approached my Client for an additional sum of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) citing urgent need, which was also advanced to you on the same assurance of repayment within two months.

 

3.      That my Client, relying upon your representations and relationship of trust, advanced the total sum of Rs. 65,000/- (Rupees Sixty-Five Thousand only) in good faith. The receipt of the said amounts has been duly acknowledged by you.

 

4.      That despite repeated oral and written requests and demands, you have failed and neglected to repay the said loan amount or any part thereof, even though the stipulated time for repayment expired long ago.

 

5.      That your continued failure to refund the said sum constitutes a breach of trust and legal obligation, and amounts to wrongful withholding of money owed to my Client.

 

6.      That my Client hereby formally demands repayment of the said sum of Rs. 65,000/- (Rupees Sixty-Five Thousand only) along with interest @ 12% per annum, calculated from the respective dates of disbursement until full realization, within 15 (fifteen) days from the date of receipt of this notice.

 

 

 

 

 

7.      Please take further notice that in the event of your failure to comply with this demand within the aforesaid time, my Client shall be constrained to initiate appropriate legal proceedings against you, including but not limited to civil suit for recovery and/or criminal complaint for cheating and breach of trust, at your sole risk, cost and consequences.

 

8.      This is your final opportunity to amicably resolve the matter and avoid the rigors of protracted litigation.

 

9.      This notice is issued without prejudice to my Clients’ rights and remedies, available under law and in equity.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

 

Sanjib Saha

Advocate

High Court Calcutta

 

Under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), limitation for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) by an operational creditor

 

Under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), limitation for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) by an operational creditor is governed by the Limitation Act, 1963, as clarified by the Supreme Court in B.K. Educational Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Parag Gupta & Associates (2018).

Key Points:

1. Limitation Period:

  • The period of limitation is 3 years from the date when the default occurs (i.e., when the debt became due and was not paid).
  • Governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act (residuary article).
  • This applies even if no demand notice was sent — limitation starts from the date of default, not the date of sending the demand notice under Section 8.

2. Section 8 Notice and Limitation:

  • The demand notice under Section 8 is a procedural step, not the trigger for limitation.
  • It does not reset or extend the limitation period.
  • If the claim is already time-barred when the Section 8 notice is issued, the application under Section 9 will be dismissed.

3. Acknowledgment of Debt – Section 18 of Limitation Act:

  • If the corporate debtor acknowledges the debt in writing before the 3-year period expires, the limitation period gets extended and runs afresh from the date of acknowledgment.

4. Effect of No Notice or Communication:

  • The absence of a prior demand notice or follow-up communications does not delay the starting point of limitation.
  • The clock starts ticking from the date of default — i.e., when payment became due and was not made — whether or not you followed up.

Under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, read with Order V Rule 1 and Order VIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (as amended for commercial disputes), the limitation period for filing a written statement is

 

Under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, read with Order V Rule 1 and Order VIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (as amended for commercial disputes), the limitation period for filing a written statement is:

  • 30 days from the date of service of summons (initial period),
  • extendable up to 120 days, but no further, even at the court's discretion.

This was affirmed by the Supreme Court in SCG Contracts India Pvt. Ltd. v. K.S. Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., (2019) 12 SCC 210, where the Court held that the 120-day period is mandatory and not directory, and if the written statement is not filed within this period, the defendant forfeits the right to file it.

Thus, no condonation of delay is permitted beyond 120 days, and the court has no power to extend the time further, even under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

Case Name: SCG Contracts India Pvt. Ltd. v. K.S. Chamankar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Citation: (2019) 12 SCC 210
Court: Supreme Court of India
Bench: R.F. Nariman and Vineet Saran, JJ.
Date: 12 March 2019

Key Points:

  • In commercial disputes under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, the time limit for filing a written statement is governed by Order VIII Rule 1 and Rule 10 of the CPC, as amended.
  • The outer limit is 120 days from the date of service of summons.
  • After this period, the right to file a written statement is forfeited.
  • The court has no discretion to extend this time beyond 120 days.
  • Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to this situation.

Other Relevant Cases:

  • M/s. OK Play India Limited v. M/s. Apex Financial Advisors Pvt. Ltd., 2021 SCC OnLine Del 4345
  • Desh Raj v. Balkishan (D) through Proposed LRs, (2020) 2 SCC 708