Friday, November 5, 2021

application for stay in an appeal under SEction 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005

 

District : Howrah.

In the Court of the Learned Additional District Session Judge, at Uluberia, Howrah.

                                                Criminal Appeal no.                 of 2021

 

                                                          In the matter of :

An application for Stay of operation of Impugned Order dated 21-08-2021, passed in Misc. Case no. 174 of 2020, by the Ld. ACJM, Uluberia.

 

AND

 

In the matter of :

Sri Arnab De,& Others,  

_____________Appellants

 

-      Versus -

 

The State of West Bengal & another,

                                                                    _________Opposite Parties.

 

The humble petition on behalf of the appellants above named most respectfully;

SHEWETH :

 

1.   That the present appeal has been preferred by the appellants under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005, before the Learned Court, against the Impugned Order dated 21-08-2021, passed in Misc. Case no. 174 of 2020, by the Ld. ACJM, Uluberia.

 

2.   That the Opposite Party no.2, herein preferred an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act’ 2005, before the Learned ACJM, Uluberia, which has been registered as Misc. Case no. 174 of 2020, against the appellants herein.

 

3.   That the appellants made their appearance in the said Misc. Case no. 174 of 2020, before the Learned ACJM, Uluberia, upon receipt of the notice under Section 13 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act’ 2005. The Appellants filed their answer being Written Objection or Show Cause with the mandatory Affidavit concerning the assets and Liability, etc.

 

4.   That in the said Misc. Case no. 174 of 2020, the Opposite Party no.2, herein has preferred one application for interim relief being an application on affidavit under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act’ 2005, thereby praying for monetary relief only. The appellants filed their answer being Written objection or Show cause against the relief prayed for by the opposite party no.2, herein, before the Learned ACJM, Uluberia.

 

5.   That the application under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act’ 2005, has been taken up for hearing by the Learned ACJM, Uluberia, and consequently passed necessary Order dated 21-08-2021, in Misc. Case no. 174 of 2020, and thereby directed the Respondent to pay maintenance allowance as monetary relief of Rs. 18,000/- p/m to the opposite party no.2, herein.

 

6.   That the Order and Judgement passed by The Learned Court below is whimsical, harsh, arbitrary and is based on surmises and conjectures and as such the same is liable to set aside.

 

7.   That the Learned Court below failed to appreciate that the Order has been passed whimsically in a mechanical manner without going into the merits of the case and the same will vitiate trial of the proceeding.

 

8.   That very surprisingly the Learned Court below did not take note of the earning of the Opposite Party no.2, herein. The Opposite Party no.2, categorically stated in her affidavit of Assets declaration that She is earning a sum of Rs. 13,732/- ( Rupees Thirteen Thousand and Seven Hundred Thirty Two ) only being Net Income per month from her Employer Tata Consultancy Services. Her Total Earning per month is as Rs. 16,560/- ( Rupees Sixteen Thousand and Five Hundred and Sixty ) only, per month, and the opposite party no.2, given a copy of her salary slip to substantiate such facts of her earning before the Learned Court below.

 

9.   That the Learned Court below did not accommodate the facts of the appellants that the appellant no.1, incurred huge expenses towards House Rent in Pune being work place at Pune, EMI for Car, Insurances, and most emergent medical expenses of old aged parents at Kolkata.

 

10.                That the Opposite Party no.2, is a Working Lady and thereby She is Earning sufficiently to maintain herself.

 

11.                That the Learned Court below did not take any facts of the appellants while passing the impugned Order dated 21-08-2021, in Misc. Case no. 174 of 2020.

 

12.                That the Opposite Party no.2, herein withdraw Matrimonial Suit no. 238 of 2020, initiated by herself against the appellant no.1, herein, in the Court of the Learned Additional District Judge 1st Court Uluberia.

 

13.                That the Opposite Party no.2, herein withdraw a proceeding under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. initiated by herself against the appellant no.1, herein in the Court of the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Uluberia.

 

14.                That the Learned Court below siding with the Opposite Party no.2, herein which resulted in  erroneous impugned order.

 

15.                That the Learned Court below erred in law vis-à-vis in facts of the case.

 

16.                That the Learned Magistrate observation and the purported order is under the violation of natural justice.

 

17.                That the impugned Order is otherwise bad in law and liable to be set aside.

 

18.                That the aforesaid impugned order is liable to be set aside or vacated in the interest of administration of Justice.

 

19.                That the appellants seeks stay of operation of the impugned order dated 21-08-2021, passed in Misc. case no. 174 of 2020, by the Learned ACJM, Uluberia, till disposal of the present appeal before this Learned Court.

 

20.                That this application is made bona-fide and for the interest of administration of justice.

 

Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the appellant most humbly prays that Your Honour may graciously be pleased to stay the operation and or effect of the Order dated 21st day of August 2021, in Misc. Case no. 174 of 2020, before the Learned Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Uluberia ;

 

-And/or -

 

to pass such further Order/Orders and or necessary Order/Orders as Your Honour may deem fit and proper for the end of Justice.

 

And for this act of kindness, Your appellants as in duty-bound shall ever pray.

 

 

VERIFICATION

 

 

I, Arnab De, the appellant no.1, herein, do hereby declare and say that the statement made in  paragraphs 1 to __________are true to the best of my knowledge and the rest are my humble submission before this Learned Court. 

 

I signed this verification on

this    day of              2021

at the Court Premises

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Affidavit

 

I, Sri Arnab De, Son of Sri Apurba Kumar De, aged about 40 years, by faith Hindu, by Occupation Service, residing at B1/4 003, Peerless Prantik Housing Complex, Sonarpur, Police Station – Narendrapur, District – South 24 Parganas, Kolkata – 700150, West Bengal, do hereby solemnly declare and affirm as follows :

 

1.   That I am competent to swear this affidavit, and I am authorized to swear this affidavit on behalf of the appellant no.2, and 3, who are my father and mother respectively.

2.   That I am the appellant no.1, herein in the present proceeding, before the Learned Court.

3.   That I am conversant and acquainted with the material facts as stated in the foregoing paragraphs of my Written Objection / schow cause.

4.   That the statements as made by me in the foregoing paragraphs in the written objection are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

5.   That all the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

 

 

 

 

DEPONENT

Identified by me,

 

Advocate.

Prepared in my Chamber,

 

Advocate

Date : __________________2021.

Place : Uluberia Court Premises.

NOTARY

Stay application in MIsc. Appeal before the Learned District Judge

 

District : South 24 Parganas


In the Court of the Learned Additional District Judge, at Baruipur, South 24 Parganas.


 
                                                Misc. Appeal no.                        of 2021

 

                                                In the matter of :

An application for stay of operation of Order No. 2 dated 31.03.2021, passed by the Learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, 2nd Court, Baruipur, South 24 Parganas in Title Suit No. 194 of 2021;

 

AND

 

In the matter of :

Smt. Sriparna Chowdhury, and Others,

          ________Defendants / Appellants

-      Versus –

Sri Ishwar Chandra Biswas,

          __________Plaintiff / Respondent

 

The humble petition of the above named Defendants / Appellants, most respectfully;

Sheweth :

 

1.   That the Plaintiff / Respondents has filed a Title Suit being T.S. no. 194 of 2021, before the Learned Civil Judge Senior Division 2nd Court at Baruipur, South 24 Parganas, under Specific Relief Act’ 1963.

 

2.   That the Learned Court below heard the Petition under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C. on 31-03-2021, and was pleased to pass an interim order which is the order impugned in the instant Misc. Appeal.

 

3.   That the Ld. Court below has missed to take note that the entire suit property of deceased Hiranmoyee Dasi, wife of Late Kesab Chandra Chowdhury, has been inherited by 25 persons, all of whom have not been made parties either in the Agreement dated 20th August, 2017, or in the suit. As such in absence of representations of each of them, the suit as well as the Agreement dated 20th August, 2017 is defective and the suit needs to be dismissed.

 

4.   That the Ld. Court below ought to have noticed that only two persons namely one Sri Pronay Chowdhury and one Sri Prosun Chowdhury, being legal heirs of deceased Hiranmoyee Dasi, had signed the unregistered Agreement dated 20th August, 2017; while others never signed the said Agreement. As such through mal practice and fraud said Agreement dated 20th August, 2017 has been prepared and the same was presented before the Ld. Court in getting the interim order. The unregistered Agreement has no value in the eye of law.

 

5.   That the Ld. Court below has missed to note that the said Agreement dated 20th August, 2017 does not contain any Memo of Consideration, apart from which there is not even a single line in the said Agreement in proof of monetary transaction, meaning thereby no monetary transaction has ever been taken place; as a result of which before passing the interim order dated 31.03.2021, the Ld. Court had no proof in terms of payment of Rupees thirty six lakh as alleged to have been given by the Plaintiff /respondent. Besides the present law prohibits transfer of rupees thirty six lakh by cash.

 

6.   That the Ld. Court below has proceeded and dealt with a fraudulent document which has no existence. The Plaintiff/Respondent has committed fraud upon the Ld. Court.

 

7.   That the Defendants/Appellants have never parted with possession of the property as noted in the impugned order passed by the Ld. Court below.

 

8.   That the Ld. Court below failed to note that only two transferors cannot transfer title of other legal heirs.

 

9.   That an F.I.R. has been registered before Baruipur Police Station for forgery and other offences, committed by the Plaintiff/Respondent, in respect of the said Agreement dated 20th August, 2017 and consequently, Baruipur Police Station case no. 1350/2021 has been started and the Plaintiff/respondent is in jail custody for more than a month.

 

10.                That the impugned order is otherwise bad in law and it should be dismissed in limini.

 

11.                That the defendants / appellants seeks stay of operation and or effect of Order No. 2 dated 31.03.2021, passed by the Learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, 2nd Court, Baruipur, South 24 Parganas in Title Suit No. 194 of 2021, till the disposal of this instant appeal.

 

12.                That unless the Learned Court grant stay of operation and or effect of Order No. 2 dated 31.03.2021, passed by the Learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, 2nd Court, Baruipur, South 24 Parganas in Title Suit No. 194 of 2021, the defendants / appellants will highly prejudice and suffer with irreparable loss and injury thereof.

 

13.                That the balance of convenience and inconveniences are in favour of the defendants / appellants and the plaintiff / respondent will not prejudice.

 

14.                That this application is made bonafide and in the interest of administration of Justice.

 

It is therefore prayed that your Honour would graciously be pleased to allow this application and to grant stay of the operation of the Order stay of operation and or effect of Order No. 2 dated 31.03.2021, passed by the Learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, 2nd Court, Baruipur, South 24 Parganas in Title Suit No. 194 of 2021, till disposal of this present appeal before the Learned Court in the interest of administration of Justice.

 

And for this act of kindness, the Defendant / appellants as in duty bound shall ever pray.

VERIFICATION


I, Smt. Sriparna Chowdhury, daughter of Late Sudhangshu Chowdhury       of Village- Jaynagar Uttarpara, Post Office and Police Station- Jaynagar, District- South 24 Parganas, Pin- 743337 do hereby declare and say that the statement made in  paragraphs 1 to ______ are true to the best of my knowledge and the rest are my humble submission before this Learned Court. I signed the verification on this
………..day of …………….2021, at the Court Premises.

A F F I D A V I T

 
I, Smt. Sriparna Chowdhury, daughter of Late Sudhangshu Chowdhury       aged about 47 years, by faith Hindu, by Occupation- House Wife , by Citizenship Indian, of Village- Jaynagar Uttarpara, Post Office and Police Station- Jaynagar, District- South 24 Parganas, Pin- 743337, do hereby solemnly affirm and say as follows:-


 

1.     That I am the defendant/Appellant no. 1 and am fully acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case and competent to swear this affidavit. I am authorized by the Defendants / appellants no. 2 to 6 to swear this affidavit on their behalf also.

 

2.     That that the statement made in  paragraphs 1, ________ are true to the best of my knowledge and the rest are my humble submission before this Learned Court. 

 

That the above statements are true to my knowledge and belief.

 

 
 
      D E P O N E N T

      Identified by me


          Advocate


Prepared in my Chamber,


 
Advocate.
Date : _______________2021.

Place : High Court, Calcutta.


N O T A R Y