In the case of M/s. Sree
Anandhakumar Mills Ltd. v. M/s. Indian Overseas Bank & Ors., the
Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of whether a civil suit is
maintainable when proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of
Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act)
have been initiated.
Citation: M/s. Sree Anandhakumar Mills Ltd. v. M/s. Indian Overseas
Bank & Ors., Civil Appeal Nos. 7214-7216 of 2012, decided on May 3, 2018.
Key Legal Principle Established:
- Bar on Civil Jurisdiction: The Supreme Court held that once proceedings under the
SARFAESI Act are initiated, the jurisdiction of civil courts is barred
under Section 34 of the Act. The appropriate remedy for an aggrieved
party is to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under Section
17 of the SARFAESI Act. This decision reinforces the principle that
the SARFAESI Act provides a specialized mechanism for the adjudication of
disputes related to secured assets, thereby ousting the jurisdiction of
civil courts in such matters.
This ruling is significant for
borrowers and guarantors challenging actions taken by secured creditors under
the SARFAESI Act, as it delineates the proper legal forum for such challenges.
No comments:
Post a Comment