3
M/s MCL Global Steel Pvt.
Ltd. & Anr. Appellants and CD
Vs.
M/s Essar Projects India Ltd.
& Anr. Respondents and Op Cr
Appeal preferred by MCL
Global against order of AA admitting CIRP
u/ 8 and 9
Grounds of appeal
The impugned ex parte order
was passed by 'Adjudicating Authority without prior notice or intimation of
hearing to the Appellants- Corporate Debtors against the principles of rules of
natural justice.
The aforesaid correspondences
clearly demonstrate the existence of dispute between the parties.
The word "includes"
connote other dispute, if any, raised apart from the dispute mentioned in
Section 8 of the 'I & B Code'.
Observations of NCLAT
Section 424 of the Companies
Act, 2013 is applicable to the proceeding under the I&B Code, 2016, it is mandatory for the adjudicating authority to
follow the Principles of rules of natural justice while passing an order under
I&B Code, 2016.
AA passed order without Notice to the Appellant which
is
violation of the principle of Natural Justice. If
Notice would have been given then the Appellant wld have highlighted the fact
of existence of Dispute before the AA. The Op Cr had concealed the fact that he
had filed winding up Petition in which the Appellant had disputed the entire
claim.
Adjudicating Authority failed to notice of the
relevant facts that there was a dispute raised and replied by the Corporate
Debtor, the impugned order passed by Adjudicating Authority cannot be upheld.
No comments:
Post a Comment