BEFORE THE HON’BLE NATIONAL COMPANY
LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA BENCH, 5, ESPLANADE ROW WEST, KOLKATA
– 700001
C.P.
( I.B. ) NO. 2137/KB/2019
In the matter of :
Reply
to the application of Financial Creditor;
AND
In
the matter of :
Samskar
Financial Services Private Limited,
________Financial
Creditor
-
Versus -
Roofers
Infrastructure India Private Limited,
______Corporate Debtor
I N D E X
|
Sl. No. |
Particulars of Documents |
Page Number/s |
Annexure |
|
1 |
Reply to the application under Form
1; |
|
- |
|
2 |
Board Resolution dated ; |
|
A |
|
3 |
Master Data of Company with the ROC |
|
B |
Signature
of the Advocate on Record
for the Corporate Debtor / Respondent
Suchitra Chakroborty, Advocate
Biplab Some, Advocate
Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate
High Court Bar Association Room No. 15,
High Court at Calcutta
Mobile Number : 9883070666 / 9836829666
Email : aksinghadvocate@rediffmail.com
BEFORE THE HON’BLE NATIONAL COMPANY
LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA BENCH, 5, ESPLANADE ROW WEST, KOLKATA
– 700001
C.P.
( I.B. ) NO. 2137/KB/20189
In the matter of :
Reply
to the application of Financial Creditor;
AND
In
the matter of :
Samskar
Financial Services Private Limited,
________Financial
Creditor
-
Versus -
Roofers
Infrastructure India Private Limited, ______Corporate Debtor
REPLY ON AFFIDAVIT
BY THE CORPORATE DEBTOR
ROOFERS INFRASTRUCTURE INDIA
PRIVATE LIMITED
AFFIDAVIT
I, Smt. Jayanti Sounth, Wife of Shri
Hirak Nath Sounth, aged about 38 years, by faith Hindu, by Occupation Business,
residing at Ganapati Bose Road, Kaushallya, Post Office – Kharagpur, Police
Station – Kharagpur ( Town ), District Paschim Medinipur, Pin – 721301, West
Bengal, being the Director of M/s. Roofers Infrastructure India Private
Limited, having its Registered Office at Diamond Tower, Jhapetapur, Kharagpur
Municipal Ward no. 27, Kharagpur Post Office, Police Station Kharagpur ( Town
), District Paschim Medinipur, Pin - 721301, West Bengal, do hereby solemnly
affirm and says as follows :
1.
That I am one of the Director of M/s.
Roofers Infrastructure India Private Limited, having its Registered Office at
Diamond Tower, Jhapetapur, Kharagpur Municipal Ward no. 27, Kharagpur Post
Office, Police Station Kharagpur ( Town ), District Paschim Medinipur, Pin -
721301, West Bengal, and I am authorized by the Company through Board
Resolution held as on 19-04-2021, to reply to the application of the Financial
Creditor.
Copy
of Board Resolution dated 19-04-2021, is enclosing herewith and marked as
Annexure – “A”
2.
That I am not suffering from any legal
disability, in terms of the Indian Contract Act’ 1872 and I am Competent to
Swear this Affidavit.
3.
That I beg to say that having perused the said
application of the financial creditor, under form 1, I had asked the office
manager for verification of Accounts and all annexure thereof related to the
Financial Creditor, for submitting the facts on the given application to the
Learned Advocate appointed by the Company, through Board Resolution dated
19-04-2021.
4.
That I beg to say that the Company’s Office
Manager, reported all necessary facts to me on 28-04-2021, but I was badly
engaged in taking medical care of my family members who had been suffering from
COVID-19. As such, I Could not go through such facts and materials placed by
the office manager, and only on 5th day of May’ 2021, I have
gone through the facts, since engagement with my family member’s medical
treatment became less, and thereafter such facts and materials have been sent to
our Learned Advocate, for preparation of Reply to the application of the
Financial Creditor, at the earliest.
5.
That I beg to say that the Learned Advocate of the
Company, received the material instructions sent through Courier by the Company
/ Corporate Debtor, on 7th day of May’ 2021, and thereafter the
Learned Advocate started preparing the reply to the application of the
financial creditor at the earliest, in terms of the instructions given and
forwarded to him, in such regard.
6.
That I beg to say that I am due diligent in
replying the application of the financial creditor but my engagement, for a
substantial period, with my family member to look after him, since he had been
suffering from COVID-19, prevented me to take necessary steps in time, which may
kindly be condoned by the Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench,
in the interest of administration of justice.
7.
That I beg to say that the Corporate Debtor, having
its registered Office at Diamond Tower, Jhapetapur, Kharagpur Municipal Ward
no. 27, Kharagpur Post Office, Police Station Kharagpur ( Town ), District
Paschim Medinipur, Pin - 721301, West Bengal formerly having its registered
office at premises being no. 103A, C.I.T. Road, 2nd Floor,
Kolkata - 700014, West Bengal, is incorporated under the Companies Act 2013,
and the said present address of the registered office is the address for all
communications by any person/s, or firm, or company incorporated or not to the
Corporate Debtor, and further more the email is as jayantisounth16@gmail.com for
electronic communication by any person/s, or firm, or company
incorporated or not to the
Corporate Debtor.
Copy
of Mater Data with ROC Kolkata, is enclosing herewith and marked as Annexure –
“B”
8.
That I beg to say that the Corporate Debtor has
availed Financial facility of Rs. 60,00,000/- ( Rupees Sixty Lakhs ) only, from
Samskar Financial Services Private Limited, after execution of the Agreement
dated 11-10-2018, through registration of Simple Mortgage on 11th day
of October’ 2018. The said financial facility is repayable within the period of
30 ( thirty ) months, commencing after expiry of 6 (six) months from the date
of execution of the agreement between the Corporate Debtor and the said Samskar
Financial Services Private Limited.
9.
That I beg to say that the said financial facility
has been granted by the said Samskar Financial Services Private Limited, while
a sum of Rs. 52.20 lakhs on 26th day of October’ 2018, through
RTGS, from its Banker Punjab & Sind Bank, Bhawanipur Branch, Kolkata, in
the account of the Corporate Debtor in Corporation Bank, Kharagpur Branch.
Thereafter Rs. 3 (three) Lakhs has been paid to Shri Chiranjeeb Biswas and Shri
Subhasish Basu (Rs. 1.50 lakhs each), and interest charged in advance for 3
(three) months as of Rs. 3,60,000/- ( Rupees Three Lakhs and Sixty Thousand )
only, and Processing Fees @ 2% as of Rs. 1,20,000/- ( Rupees One Lakh and
Twenty Thousand ) only.
10.
That I beg to say that the First document being
Agreement dated 11-10-2018, which has been notorized but not registered says as
follows :
a.
At page number 5 – paragraph number 1 – The
Borrower is agreed to borrow and the Lenders have agreed to lend upto a amount
of Rs. 30,00,000/- ( Rupees Thirty Lakhs only).
b.
At page number 6 – paragraph number 7 – The loan
shall be fully repayable after a period of 6 (six) months.
c.
At page number 7 –paragraph number 9 – In case the
Borrowers are unable to repay the loan along with unpaid interest, if any, in
its entirely on completion of a period of 30 months, the Lenders shall inform
the Borrowers in writing that they intend to sell the mortgaged premises and
that the maximum sale value at which sale could take effect. In case, the
Lenders do not get repaid of the loan and interest in its entirety within a
period of 60 days thereafter, Lenders would be at liberty to sell the Premises
and get the same registered by the Attorney of the Borrowers and after
adjusting their dues, pay the remaining sale proceeds to the Borrowers.
d.
At page number 8 – ALL THAT three nos. of
residential flats of Diamond Tower, Block – E, (1) Flat no. 104, on the First
Floor, Measuring about 1021 sq. ft. super built up area, (2) Flat no. 201, on
the Second Floor, measuring about 1021 sq. ft. super built up area and (3) Flat
no. 302, on the Third Floor, measuring about 1021 sq. ft. super built up area
lying and situated at Mouza – Madan Mohan, J.L. No. 308, Touzi No. 1260, R.S.
No. 3127, under R.S. Khatian no. 205, 232, comprised in R.S. Dag no. 235, within
the local ambit of Changual Gram Panchayat, District Paschim Medinipur.
11.
That I beg to say that the First Deed of Simple
Mortgage, registered in Book no. I, Volume Number 1903 – 2018, Pages from
105236 to 105269, Being no. 190302691 for the year 2018, in respect of ALL THAT
three nos. of residential flat of Diamond Tower, Block – E, (1) Flat no. 104,
on the First Floor, Measuring about 1021 sq. ft. super built up area, (2) Flat
no. 201, on the Second Floor, measuring about 1021 sq. ft. super built up area
and (3) Flat no. 302, on the Third Floor, measuring about 1021 sq. ft. super
built up area lying and situated at Mouza – Madan Mohan, J.L. No. 308, Touzi
No. 1260, R.S. No. 3127, under R.S. Khatian no. 205, 232, comprised in R.S. Dag
no. 235, within the local ambit of Changual Gram Panchayat, District Paschim
Medinipur, has been done for the purpose of securing financial facility as of
Rs. 30,00,000/- ( Rupees Thirty Lakhs ) only.
12.
That I beg to say that the Second document being
Agreement dated 11-10-2018, which has been notoaized but not registered
document covenant preciously in the followings :
a.
At page number 5 – paragraph number 1 – The
Borrower has agreed to borrow and the Lenders have agreed to lend upto a amount
of Rs. 30,00,000/- ( Rupees Thirty Lakhs only).
b.
At page number 6 – paragraph number 7 – The loan
shall be fully repayable after a period of 6 (six) months.
c.
At page number 7 –paragraph number 9 – In case the
Borrowers are unable to repay the loan along with unpaid interest, if any, in
its entirely on completion of a period of 30 months, the Lenders shall inform
the Borrowers in writing that they intend to sell the mortgaged premises and
that the maximum sale value at which sale could take effect. In case, the
Lenders do not get repaid of the loan and interest in its entirety within a
period of 60 days thereafter, Lenders would be at liberty to sell the Premises
and get the same registered by the Attorney of the Borrowers and after
adjusting their dues, pay the remaining sale proceeds to the Borrowers.
d.
At page number 8 – ALL THAT three nos. of
residential flat of Diamond Tower, Block – E, (1) Flat no. 401, on the Fourth
Floor, Measuring about 1087 sq. ft. super built up area, (2) Flat no. 402, on
the Fourth Floor, measuring about 1021 sq. ft. super built up area and (3) Flat
no. 404, on the Fourth Floor, measuring about 1087 sq. ft. super built up area
lying and situated at Mouza – Madan Mohan, J.L. No. 308, Touzi No. 1260, R.S.
No. 3127, under R.S. Khatian no. 205, 232, comprised in R.S. Dag no. 235, within
the local ambit of Changual Gram Panchayat, District Paschim Medinipur.
14. That I
beg to say that the First Deed of Simple Mortgage, being registered in Book no.
I, Volume Number 1903 – 2018, Pages from 105270 to 105303, Being no. 190302692
for the year 2018, in respect of ALL THAT three nos. of residential flat of
Diamond Tower, Block – E, (1) Flat no. 401, on the Fourth Floor, Measuring
about 1087 sq. ft. super built up area, (2) Flat no. 402, on the Fourth Floor,
measuring about 1021 sq. ft. super built up area and (3) Flat no. 404, on the
Fourth Floor, measuring about 1087 sq. ft. super built up area lying and
situated at Mouza – Madan Mohan, J.L. No. 308, Touzi No. 1260, R.S. No. 3127,
under R.S. Khatian no. 205, 232, comprised in R.S. Dag no. 235, within the
local ambit of Changual Gram Panchayat, District Paschim Medinipur, for the
purpose of securing financial facility as of Rs. 30,00,000/- ( Rupees Thirty
Lakhs ) only.
15. That I
beg to say that no Promissory note has ever been executed in terms of the
established provisions of the Negotiable Instrument Act’ 1881, by the Corporate
Debtor in favour of Samskar Financial Services Private Limited.
16. That I
beg to say that in terms of the Agreement dated 11-10-2018, the repayment
started after the period of six months and within the period of Thirty months
commencing from the date of execution of the Agreement for financial facility
with Samskar Financial Services Private Limited, and whereas the three months
advance interest has been taken by the said Lender Samskar Financial Services
Private Limited, therefore the first repayment should be started after expiry
of the period of nine months, which come as in the month of August’ 2019, and
not prior to that in any event, whatsoever.
17. That I
beg to say that two number of Blank Cheque has been assigned to the Lender at
the time of execution of the Agreement dated 11-10-2018, towards security of
the financial facility. The said Blank Cheques has been filled up by the Lender
being the Financial Creditor herein without having any consent of the Corporate
Debtor and placed for encashment which subsequently dishonoured. The Lender
initiated complaint case for Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act’ 1881.
The said Complaint Case is pending before the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate,
Kolkata.
18. That I
beg to say that the purported claim of the Lender is not a financial debt in
terms of the prescribed facts as stated herein by the Corporate Debtor. The
said Claim is not even a Debt in terms of the prescribed provisions of the Law.
Therefore the present application under Form I, is not entitle to admit, in the
interest of administration of justice.
19. That I
beg to say that the Agreements dated 11-10-2018, have self contradictory
statements, and not registered in terms of the prescribed provisions of Law,
therefore the said agreements are void in Law and not acceptable at any terms,
whatsoever.
20. That I
beg to say that the Simple Deed of Mortgage dated 11-10-2018, which has been
executed and registered by and between the parties, stated about the Agreement
dated 10-10-2018, which has never been existed by and between the parties,
therefore the said simple deed of mortgage is not enforceable at any terms in
the prescribed provisions of the Law of Land.
21. That I
beg to say that the Documents relied on by the Financial Creditor in its
application under Form 1, are not appropriate documents as to constitute the
Financial Debt as meant for in the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code’ 2016.
22. That I
beg to say that the Statement of Accounts being Ledger as produced by the
Financial Creditor has not ever been authenticated by any Account Professional
i.e. Charterer Accountant or by the Company Secretary, so far therefore the
said Ledge as produced by the Financial Creditor is not acceptable and denied
by the Corporate Debtor, herein.
23. That I
beg to say that the Bank Statement in printed form which has been annexed by
the Financial Creditor has been denied and not acceptable as the same has not
been with any Bank’s seal or signature thereof.
24. That I
beg to say that the Financial Creditor did not produce any Balance Sheet and
Financial accounts for the respective year and the documents relates to the
Income Tax and RBI as to show that the Financial Creditor has ever given
acknowledgment of the said financial facility in its Book of Accounts to the
respective Government Authority, therefore the said financial facility, if any,
is not a legally enforceable debt.
25. That I
beg to say that the Financial Creditor being the Lender did not produce any
document to show that the Financial Creditor have any authority to grant such
financial facility at the 24% rate of interest on compound basis, so far,
therefore such grant of financial facility at the such higher rate is in violation
of the prescribed provisions of the Law in terms of the Interest Act’ 1978.
26. That I beg to say that the facts and
the documents as relied on by the Financial Creditor does not constitute any
Financial Debt against the Corporate Debtor, therefore such an
application is liable to be dismissed in
liminie.
27. That I beg to say that the Corporate Debtor
has paid repayments up-till July’ 2019 to the Lender Samskar Financial Services
Private Limited. The Corporate Debtor is not a defaulter as described by the
Lender Samskar Financial Services Private Limited. The application of the
Lender in Form no.1, is not maintainable and liable to be dismissed in liminie.
28. That I beg to say that the purported claim of
the Lender Samskar Financial Services Private Limited, is not a Financial Debt
within the meaning of Section 5(8) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code’
2016, therefore such an application is liable to be dismissed in liminie.
29. That I beg to say that the Agreement dated
11-10-2018, is an expressed contract between the Lender and the Corporate
Debtor, and whereas in terms of the contract the claim as represented by the
Lender has not ever arisen against the Corporate Debtor, therefore such an
application is liable to be dismissed in liminie.
30. That I beg to say that the Corporate Debtor
has never acknowledged the debt as described by the Lender herein in its
application under Form no.1, therefore such an application is liable to be
dismissed in liminie.
31. That I beg to say that the Financial Creditor
failed to produce any document and or paper, so far, as to establish its claim
and or demand in terms of the facts as well as in terms of the Law, and thus
the application under Form 1 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy ( Application to
Adjudicating Authority ) Rules’ 2016, is liable to be rejected and
dismissed inlimnie, with exemplary cost thereof on the financial
creditor, in the interest of administration of justice.
32. That I
beg to say that the Financial Creditor has no proper authority to place such
application under Form 1 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy ( Application to
Adjudicating Authority ) Rules’ 2016, against the Corporate Debtor, in terms of
the facts as well as in terms of the Law, and therefore is liable to be
rejected and dismissed inlimnie, with exemplary cost thereof on the
financial creditor, in the interest of administration of justice.
33. That I
beg to say that the present application under Form 1 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy ( Application to Adjudicating Authority ) Rules’ 2016, is not in
form as prescribed under the Law, and therefore is liable to be rejected and
dismissed inlimnie, with exemplary cost thereof on the financial
creditor, in the interest of administration of justice.
34. That I beg
to say that since no notice as prescribed under the Agreement dated 11-10-2018,
has ever been served on the corporate debtor by the financial creditor, the
present application under Form 1 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy ( Application
to Adjudicating Authority ) Rules’ 2016, is liable to be rejected and
dismissed inlimnie, with exemplary cost thereof on the financial
creditor, in the interest of administration of justice.
35. That I
beg to say that the demand and or claim amount is not proper and justified, as
the same has not ever been accrued in favour of the financial creditor, at any
terms whatsoever, and therefore liable to be rejected and dismissed inlimnie,
with exemplary cost thereof on the financial creditor, in the interest of
administration of justice.
36. That I
beg to say that the present application under Form 1 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy ( Application to Adjudicating Authority ) Rules’ 2016, has
been placed with motivation of wrongful gain by the financial creditor against
the corporate debtor, and therefore is liable to be rejected and
dismissed inlimnie, with exemplary cost thereof on the financial
creditor, in the interest of administration of justice.
37. That I
beg to say that the Demand and / or claim are not in conformity with the
Agreement dated 11-10-2018, and others, the same cannot be taken as granted in
terms of the facts as well as in terms of the Law, and therefore liable to be
rejected and dismissed inlimnie, with exemplary cost thereof on the
financial creditor, in the interest of administration of justice.
38. That I
beg to say that there was no amount, as shown in the purported tabulation sheet
of accounts of the financial creditor has ever been occurred, and therefore is
liable to be rejected and dismissed inlimnie, with exemplary cost
thereof on the financial creditor, in the interest of administration of
justice.
39. That I
beg to say that the mandatory notices of demand has never been served on the
corporate debtor by the financial creditor, in any terms whatsoever, and therefore
liable to be rejected and dismissed inlimnie, with exemplary cost
thereof on the financial creditor, in the interest of administration of
justice.
40. That I
beg to say that as there is no demand in terms of the facts as well as in terms
of the law, nor has it been ever placed by the financial creditor, the
application under form 1 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy ( Application to
Adjudicating Authority ) Rules’ 2016, and therefore liable to be rejected and
dismissed inlimnie, with exemplary cost thereof on the financial
creditor, in the interest of administration of justice.
41. That I
beg to say that the financial creditor placed this present application and the
application under form 1 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy ( Application to
Adjudicating Authority ) Rules’ 2016, before the Hon’ble National Company Law
Tribunal, with purposive motive and intention to acquire wrongful gains, and
therefore liable to be rejected and dismissed inlimnie, with
exemplary cost thereof on the financial creditor, in the interest of
administration of justice.
42. That I
beg to say that the Demand and or claim of the financial creditor, does not
constitute debt and or liabilities and or legal enforceable debt or liabilities
and therefore the application under form 1 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
(Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules’ 2016, is liable to be rejected
and dismissed inlimnie, with exemplary cost thereof on the
financial creditor, in the interest of administration of justice.
43. That I
beg to say that the financial creditor has not complied with the terms and
provisions of the Company Act’ 2013, in placing the application under form 1 of
the Insolvency and Bankruptcy ( Application to Adjudicating Authority ) Rules’
2016, and therefore liable to be rejected and dismissed inlimnie,
with exemplary cost thereof on the financial creditor, in the interest of
administration of justice.
44. That I
beg to say that the Particulars of the Financial Debt as of Rs. 71,73,367/- (
Rupees Seventy Lakhs Seventy Three Thousand and Three Hundred Sixty Seven )
only, as stated in the application under form 1 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy ( Application to Adjudicating Authority ) Rules’ 2016, are wrong and
not acceptable in any form in terms of the facts as well as in terms of the
Law, and therefore is liable to be rejected and dismissed inlimnie,
with exemplary cost thereof on the financial creditor, in the interest of
administration of justice.
45. That I
beg to say that there was no continuous
accounts and liability has never been casted on the corporate
debtor in any way, either in terms of the facts or in terms of the Law, and
therefore the application under form 1 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (
Application to Adjudicating Authority ) Rules’ 2016, is liable to be rejected and
dismissed inlimnie, with exemplary cost thereof on the financial
creditor, in the interest of administration of justice.
46. That I
beg to say that the present application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code’ 2016, is not maintainable in its entirety, and therefore
the application under form 1 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy ( Application to
Adjudicating Authority ) Rules’ 2016, is liable to be rejected and
dismissed inlimnie, with exemplary cost thereof on the financial
creditor, in the interest of administration of justice.
47. That I
beg to say that since there is no demand in terms of the facts as well as in
terms of the law, nor the same has ever been placed by the financial creditor,
the application under form 1 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy ( Application to
Adjudicating Authority ) Rules’ 2016, and therefore liable to be rejected and
dismissed inlimnie, with exemplary cost thereof on the financial
creditor, in the interest of administration of justice.
48. That I
beg to say that the Demand and or claim of the financial creditor, does not
constitute debt and or liabilities and or legal enforceable debt or liabilities
and therefore the application under form 1 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (
Application to Adjudicating Authority ) Rules’ 2016, is liable to be rejected
and dismissed inlimnie, with exemplary cost thereof on the
financial creditor, in the interest of administration of justice.
49. That I
beg to say that the Particulars of the Financial Debt as of Rs. 71,73,367/- (
Rupees Seventy Lakhs Seventy Three Thousand and Three Hundred Sixty Seven )
only, as stated in the application under form 1 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy ( Application to Adjudicating Authority ) Rules’ 2016, are wrong and
not acceptable in terms of the facts as well as in terms of the Law, and
therefore, the same is liable to be rejected and dismissed inlimnie,
with exemplary cost thereof on the financial creditor, in the interest of
administration of justice.
50. That I
beg to say that there was no continuous accounts and liability has ever been
casted on the corporate debtor at any terms, in terms of the facts as well as
in terms of the Law, and therefore the application under form 1 of the
Insolvency and Bankruptcy ( Application to Adjudicating Authority ) Rules’ 2016,
is liable to be rejected and dismissed inlimnie, with exemplary
cost thereof on the financial creditor, in the interest of administration of
justice.
51. That I
beg to say that the demand and or claim amount is not proper and justified, as
the same has not ever been accrued in favour of the financial creditor, at any
terms whatsoever, and therefore liable to be rejected and dismissed inlimnie,
with exemplary cost thereof on the financial creditor, in the interest of
administration of justice.
52. That I
beg to say that the present application under Form 1 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy ( Application to Adjudicating Authority ) Rules’ 2016, has
been placed with motivation of wrongful gain by the financial creditor against
the corporate debtor, and therefore liable to be rejected and dismissed inlimnie,
with exemplary cost thereof on the financial creditor, in the interest of
administration of justice.
53. That I
therefore prayed that the Hon’ble National Company law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench,
would graciously be pleased to accept the reply of the Corporate Debtor, and to
reject and or to dismiss the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code’ 2016, placed by the Financial Creditor, in the interest of
administration of justice, and or to pass such other order or orders as the
Hon’ble National Company law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench, may deem, fit and proper
for the end of justice.
54. That
the above statements are true to my knowledge and belief, and no part whereof
has ever been concealed by me.
DEPONENT
Identified by
me,
Advocate.
Prepared in my
Chamber,
Advocate.
Date :
_______________2021
Place :
Kolkata.
N O T A R Y
BEFORE THE
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA BENCH,
KOLKATA – 700001
C.P. ( I.B. )
NO. 2137/KB/2018
In the matter
of :
Samskar
Financial Services Private Limited,
________Financial
Creditor
-
Versus
–
Roofers
Infrastructure India Private Limited,
________Corporate Debtor
REPLY ON
AFFIDAVIT
Prepared in my
Chamber :
Suchitra
Choakroborty, Advocate
Biplab Some,
Advocate
Ashok Kumar
Singh, Advocate
High Court Bar
Association Room No. 15, High Court at Calcutta
Mobile Number : 9883070666 / 9836829666, E-mail : aksinghadvocate@rediffmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment