Saturday, November 1, 2025

APPLICATION FOR KEEPING IN ABEYANCE THE RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS

 

Before the Hon’ble Recovery Officer

In the Debts Recovery Tribunal Kolkata – 1,

9th Floor, JeevanSudha Building, 42-C, JawaharLal Nehru Road, Kolkata – 700071

 

 

I.A. No.          of 2025

in

RC/64/2024

in

OA/251/2009

 

                                                          In the matter of ;

                                                          Bank of Baroda,

                                                                   ____________Applicant / CHB

-      Versus –

M/s. Apurba Overseas Private Limited and Others,

          __________Defendants / CD

APPLICATION FOR KEEPING IN ABEYANCE THE RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS IN VIEW OF PENDING ONE-TIME SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL AND PART PAYMENT OF 10,94,894.80/-

I N D E X

Sl. No.

Particulars’

Annexure

Page

1

APPLICATION FOR KEEPING IN ABEYANCE THE RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS IN VIEW OF PENDING ONE-TIME SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL AND PART PAYMENT OF 10,94,894.80/-

-

1 to 4

2

Photostat copy of all communications pursuing the OTS Settlement and the Demand Draft of 10,94,894.80/-

“A”

5 to

 

Advocate-On-Record;

 

Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate

High Court Bar association Room No. 15, High Court Calcutta Mobile Number : 9883070666 / 9836829666 Email : aksinghadvocate@rediffmail.com

APPLICATION FOR KEEPING IN ABEYANCE THE RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS IN VIEW OF PENDING ONE-TIME SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL

 

 

Before the Hon’ble Recovery Officer

In the Debts Recovery Tribunal Kolkata–1,

9th Floor, Jeevan Sudha Building, 42-C, Jawahar Lal Nehru Road, Kolkata – 700071

 

 

I.A. No.        of 2025

in RC/64/2024

in OA/251/2009

 

In the matter of;

Bank of Baroda,

Applicant/CHB

 

-    Versus

 

M/s. Apurba Overseas Private Limited and Others,

Defendants/CD

 

 

APPLICATION FOR KEEPING IN ABEYANCE THE RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS IN VIEW OF PENDING ONE-TIME SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL AND PART PAYMENT OF 10,94,894.80/-

 

The humble application of the Certificate Debtors above named most respectfully;

 

Showeth as under;

 

1.   That the present recovery proceeding has been initiated by the Certificate Holder Bank in execution of the Recovery Certificate issued by the Hon’ble Presiding Officer, DRT-I, Kolkata, in O.A. No. 251 of 2009, and the same is presently pending before this Hon’ble Recovery Officer.

 

 

 

 

2.   That the Certificate Debtors, in order to amicably settle the matter and discharge their liability, have submitted a One-Time Settlement (OTS) proposal before the Certificate Holder Bank, which is under active consideration of the competent authority of the Bank.

 

Photostat copy of all communications pursuing the OTS Settlement between the Certificate Debtors & the Certificate Holder Bank and the Demand Draft of 10,94,894.80/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Ninety Four Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety Four and paise Eighty) only, are collectively annexed herewith and marked as Annexure – “A”.

 

3.   That in good faith and in pursuance of such proposed settlement, the Certificate Debtors have already deposited a sum of 10,94,894.80/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Ninety Four Thousand and Eight Hundred Ninety Four and paise Eighty only) with the Certificate Holder Bank towards the proposed OTS, the receipt of which has been duly acknowledged by the Bank.

 

4.   That the said proposal for OTS is still pending decision before the Bank, and the Certificate Debtors are in regular communication with the Bank for early finalization of the same.

 

5.   That this Hon’ble Recovery Officer has been pleased to fix 04/11/2025 as the next date for submission of assets by the Certificate Debtors in connection with the above proceeding.

 

6.   That in view of the pending OTS proposal and part payment already made, continuation of coercive recovery proceedings at this stage may frustrate the possibility of an amicable settlement between the parties and cause irreparable prejudice to the Certificate Debtors.

 

7.   That it is well settled that where the borrower and the bank are engaged in bona fide settlement negotiations, the recovery proceedings may be kept in abeyance for a reasonable period to facilitate such settlement, particularly when substantial payment has already been made.

 

8.   That the Certificate Debtors undertake to abide by the terms of the OTS if approved and not to alienate or dispose of any assets if any, pending such consideration.

 

9.   That the present application is made bona fide and in the interest of justice.

 

 

 

In view of the facts and circumstances stated hereinabove, the Certificate Debtors most respectfully pray that this Hon’ble Recovery Officer may graciously be pleased to;

 

a)           Keep the present recovery proceedings in abeyance, including submission of assets, till the final decision of the Certificate Holder Bank on the OTS proposal submitted by the Certificate Debtors;

 

b)        Direct the Certificate Holder Bank to communicate its decision on the pending OTS proposal within a time-bound period;

 

c)         Pass such further or other order(s) as this Hon’ble Recovery Officer may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

 

 

And for this act of kindness, the Certificate Debtors shall, as in duty bound, ever pray.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AFFIDAVIT

 

I, Dulal Chandra Naskar, Son of Late Lalit Mohan Naskar, aged about 56 years, by faith Hindu, by Occupation Business, residing at Village – Tegharia, Post Office – Ramkrishna Pally, Police Station – Sonarpur, Kolkata 700150, District – South 24 Parganas, do hereby solemnly affirm and says as follows;

 

1.   That I am being the Defendant No. 2 / CD No. 2, in the present Recovery Proceeding. I am authorized by the Defendant nos. 1, & 3, / CD Nos. 1& 3, herein in the present Recovery Proceeding by the Board Resolution. I am one of the Director of the CD No. 1, herein and the CD No. 3, is also one of the Director of the CD No.1, herein M/s. Apurba Overseas Private Limited. I and the CD No.3 are the Directors and the Guarantors. I am Competent to swear this Affidavit.

 

2.   That since the OTS proposal is pending and substantial payment has been made, continuation of coercive recovery proceedings, including submission of assets, may adversely affect the ongoing settlement process and cause irreparable prejudice to the deponent.

 

3.   That the deponent undertakes not to transfer, alienate, or encumber any movable or immovable property pending consideration of the OTS proposal by the Bank.

 

4.   That the deponent therefore prays that this Hon’ble Recovery Officer may be pleased to keep the recovery proceedings in abeyance till the Bank decides on the pending OTS proposal, and to pass such further or other order as may be deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice.

 

5.   That the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

 

 

 

DEPONENT

Identified by me,

 

 

Advocate

Prepared in my Chamber,

 

 

Advocate

Date : ____day of November’ 2025;

Place : Kolkata, West Bengal

 

NOTARY

 

Before the Hon’ble Recovery Officer

In the Debts Recovery Tribunal Kolkata–1,

9th Floor, Jeevan Sudha Building, 42-C, Jawahar Lal Nehru Road, Kolkata – 700071

 

I.A. No.  ______of 2025

in

RC/64/2024

in

OA/251/2009

 

In the matter of;

Bank of Baroda,

                                 ________Applicant/CHB

 

-        Versus

 

M/s. Apurba Overseas Private Limited and Others,

                                 ________Defendants/CD

 

 

APPLICATION FOR KEEPING IN ABEYANCE THE RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS IN VIEW OF PENDING ONE-TIME SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL AND PART PAYMENT OF 10,94,894.80/-

 

 

 

Advocate-On-Record;

 

Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate

High Court Bar association Room No. 15, High Court Calcutta Mobile Number : 9883070666 / 9836829666 Email : aksinghadvocate@rediffmail.com

 

REPLY TO SHOW CAUSE ON BEHALF OF THE DECREE HOLDER

 

BEFORE THE HON’BLE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SOUTH 24 PARGANAS

Execution Application No.: DC/304/CC/23/2022
Arising out of Complaint Case No.: DC/304/CC/23/2022

 

In the matter of;


Execution of the Final Order dated 21/03/2023, passed by this Hon’ble Commission, in DC/304/CC/23/2022;

 

AND

 

In the matter of;

 

Sri Harish Chandra,
Son of Late Raja Ram,
Residing at Premises No. P-110, Ground Floor, Oxytown, Sarsuna,
Kolkata – 700061,
Post Office & Police Station – Sarsuna,
District – South 24 Parganas.

________Decree Holder

 

-Versus-

 

1.      M/s. Lord Realty Private Limited,
Having its Registered Office at Lord House, Premises No. 71/9, Topsia Road, Kolkata – 700046,
Also at 7B, Ahirpukur Road, Kolkata – 700019, District – South 24 Parganas.

 

2.      Mr. Anwar Azim,
Chairman & Managing Director,
M/s. Lord Realty Private Limited,
Having office at Lord House, Premises No. 71/9, Topsia Road, Kolkata – 700046,
And at 7B, Ahirpukur Road, Kolkata – 700019, Police Station – Topsia, Post Office – Gobind Khatick Road,
District – South 24 Parganas.

_________Judgment Debtors

 REPLY TO SHOW CAUSE ON BEHALF OF THE DECREE HOLDER

 Most Respectfully Showeth as under;

 

  1. That the present reply is being filed by the Decree Holder in compliance with the direction of this Hon’ble Commission, whereby the Decree Holder has been called upon to show cause as to why the instant execution case should not be dismissed for default.

 

  1. That it is submitted with utmost respect that on the date fixed i.e. 19th September, 2025, the Learned Advocate for the Decree Holder could not remain present before this Hon’ble Commission inadvertently due to a mistaken entry of the said date in his professional diary. The non-appearance was entirely unintentional and bona fide in nature, caused solely by a clerical mistake in recording the date of hearing.

 

  1. That the Decree Holder submits that there was no deliberate or willful default or negligence in pursuing the execution proceeding, and the absence of the Learned Advocate on the said date was purely accidental and not with any intention to delay or disregard the process of this Hon’ble Commission.

 

  1. That on the earlier date of hearing i.e. 29th July, 2025, the Police Authority had submitted a report stating inter alia that at the given addresses, the Judgment Debtors could not be located and that they had vacated the premises long ago. Consequently, this Hon’ble Commission had been pleased to direct the Decree Holder to furnish better particulars of the present address of the Judgment Debtors to enable effective execution of the Warrant of Arrest and enforcement of the decree.

 

  1. That the Decree Holder, being a private individual, has been making sincere and continuous efforts to trace the present whereabouts of the Judgment Debtors, but due to limited means and resources, could not yet ascertain their current addresses. The Decree Holder, however, is diligently pursuing such information and shall place the same before this Hon’ble Commission as soon as it is traced.

 

  1. That the Decree Holder most humbly submits that several execution cases are pending against the said Judgment Debtors before this Hon’ble Commission and other fora, which shows their deliberate attempt to evade the lawful process of execution and compliance of the decree passed against them.

 

  1. That in the light of the above bona fide circumstances, the Decree Holder most respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Commission may kindly condone the inadvertent non-appearance on 19th September, 2025, and be pleased to grant reasonable time to the Decree Holder to collect and submit the present addresses of the Judgment Debtors for the effective execution of the decree in the interest of justice.

 

  1. That this application is made bonafide and in the interest of administration of Justice.

  

In view of the foregoing, the Decree Holder most respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Commission may be pleased to;

 

a) Accept this reply to show cause and be pleased not to dismiss the instant Execution Application No. DC/304/CC/23/2022 for default;

b) Condone the absence of the Learned Advocate for the Decree Holder on 19th September, 2025, being bona fide and unintentional;

c) Grant reasonable time to the Decree Holder to furnish the present address and whereabouts of the Judgment Debtors for effective execution of the decree; and

 

d) Pass such further order or orders as this Hon’ble Commission may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.

 

And for this act of kindness, the Decree Holder as in duty bound shall ever pray.

 

VERIFICATION

I, Harish Chandra, Son of Late Raja Ram, residing at Premises No. P-110, Ground Floor, Oxytown, Sarsuna, Kolkata – 700061, do hereby verify that the statements made in paragraphs 1 to 7 of the foregoing reply are true to my knowledge and belief and that I have not suppressed any material fact.

Verified at Baruipur
On this ___ day of November, 2025.

 

(Harish Chandra)
Decree Holder

 

 AFFIDAVIT

I, Harish Chandra, Son of Late Raja Ram, aged about ___ years, residing at Premises No. P-110, Ground Floor, Oxytown, Sarsuna, Kolkata – 700061, Post Office & Police Station – Sarsuna, District – South 24 Parganas, do hereby solemnly affirm and state as follows;

  1. That I am the Decree Holder in the above execution proceeding and am fully acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case.

 

  1. That the accompanying Reply to Show Cause has been drafted and filed under my instructions, the contents whereof have been read over and explained to me in vernacular, and I fully understand the same.

 

  1. That the statements made in paragraphs 1 to 7 of the said Reply to Show Cause are true to my knowledge and belief, and those submitted in the “Prayer” portion are based on legal advice which I believe to be true.

 

  1. That the non-appearance of my Learned Advocate before this Hon’ble Commission on 19th September, 2025, was wholly inadvertent and unintentional, caused due to mistaken entry of the date in his professional diary, and not due to any deliberate negligence or default.

 

  1. That I have been making all bona fide and reasonable efforts to trace the present address and whereabouts of the Judgment Debtors, as directed by this Hon’ble Commission, for due satisfaction of the decree.

 

  1. That the facts stated herein are true to my knowledge and belief and nothing material has been concealed therefrom.

 

Harish Chandra
Deponent

Identified by me,

Advocate