Before
the Learned Rent Controller, Calcutta
Alipore Judges’ Court, Alipore,
Kolkata – 700027
Application no. 5/ 35/ of 2021
In
the matter of :
Shri Inder Chand Agarwala
Son
of Late Sova Chand Agarwala, of premises being no. 1, Tarpan Ghat Road, Post
Office & Police Station – Behala, Kolkata – 700 053, District – South 24
Parganas.
...........Tenant/ Petitioner
-Versus-
Police Station : Behala
1) Sarbati Devi Agarwala Estate,
having its Office at Premises being no. 1, Tarpan Ghat Road, Post Office and
Police Station – Behala, Kolkata – 700 053, District – South 24 Parganas.
2) Misri Devi Agarwala Estate,
having its Office at Premises being no. 7, Rajani Sen Road, Kolkata – 700 026
..............Landlords
/ Respondents
CASE & CITATION REFERENCES
ON BEHALF OF
THE APPLICANT / TENANT
INDER CHAND AGARWALA
|
No. |
Case
& Citation |
Key
Legal Principle |
|
1 |
Somnath Mukherjee v. Mamata Rani
Saha, Calcutta High Court, 3 Apr 2006 |
Held
that Section 35 of the WBPT Act, 1997 is equivalent to Section 34 of the
earlier Act, and that the remedy for repairs/essential services is available
to tenant. Also discussed jurisdictional aspect of Controller vs Civil Court. |
|
2 |
Mrinal Kanti Ghosh v. Mango Debi
(“C.O. 1191 of 2012 with CAN 4955 of 2014”) – Calcutta High Court, 24 Feb
2015 |
Held
that Section 35 of the WBPT Act, 1997 is equivalent to Section 34 of the
earlier Act, and that the remedy for repairs/essential services is available
to tenant. Also discussed jurisdictional aspect of Controller vs Civil Court. |
No comments:
Post a Comment