Before
the Hon’ble District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata Unit – III
18,
Judges Court Road, Kolkata 700027
Complaint
Case no. CC/86/2021
In
the matter of :
Sri
Jayanta Nath & Anr.,
___________Petitioners
-
Versus
–
Sri Soumen
Chakraborty, and Others,
___________Opposite Parties,
QUESTIONNAIRE BY THE OPPOSITE
PARTY NO.1, SRI SOUMEN CHAKRABORTY
The followings are
the questions raised by the Opposite Party no.1, against the Evidence on
Affidavit submitted by the Complainants, herein, in the present Consumer
Proceeding;
Questions ;
Question no. 1 What is your Qualification?
kindly state.
Question
no. 2 Did you ever authorized by
the Complainant no. 2, Smt. Sarmistha Nath ?
Question
no. 3 Did you ever placed such
authorization before the Hon’ble District Commission ?
Question
no. 4 Who swear the affidavit in
the petition of Complaint ? Did you ever enclose the authorization of the
Petitioner no. 2, therein ?
Question
no. 5 Who swear the affidavit of
your Evidence ? Did you ever enclose the authorization of the Petitioner no. 2,
therein ?
Question
no. 6 This is true that there is
no consent of the petitioner no.2, in instituting this present consumer
complaint. Say yes or no, describe your answer, in details, if any.
Question
no. 7 This is true that there is
no authorization has ever been given by the petitioner no.2, to you in
instituting the present consumer complaint, Say yes or no, describe your answer
in details, if any.
Question
no. 8 Whether the Petition of
Consumer Complaint has ever been duly signed by the Petitioner no.2, herein ?
Question
no. 9 What is qualification of the
Petitioner no.2, herein ?
Question
no. 10 Whether the husband and wife
can be in ambit of the Doctrine of absolute Privilege ?
Question
no. 11 This is true that the
Petitioner is an Income Tax Assessee, Say Yes or No, describe your answer in
details if any.
Question
no. 12 What is quantum of your
Salary from School ?
Question
no. 13 Did you give any representation
to this opposite party prior to 14th December’ 2020 ?
Question
no. 14 This is true that the
Pandemic Situation has arises since 15th day of March’ 2020, and
normalized in the year 2021. Say Yes or No, describe your answer in details, if
any.
Question
no. 15 Did you ever enclose your
such communication with the opposite party no.1, herein in your petition of
complaint and or in your Evidence on Affidavit ?
Question
no. 16 This is true that the
Petitioner no.2, herein did not authorized being wife of yours to put your
signature on her behalf in the Agreement for Sale dated 23rd day of
March’ 2017, Say yes or no, describe your answer in details, if any.
Question
no. 17 This is true that the Letter
dated 29/08/2022, has been given by you and the has not been given by the
Petitioner no.2, herein. Say yes or no, describe your answer in details, if
any.
Question
no. 18 This is true that you were
not able to make the payments in terms of the Agreement for Sale, Say yes or no
describe your answer in details, if any.
Question
no. 19 This is true that you are
willful defaulter in paying money as not following the payment terms agreed
between the parties in terms of the Agreement for Sale, Say yes or no, describe
your answer in details, if any.
Question
no. 20 This is true that the
disputes you referred in your consumer complaint is not a Consumer Disputes as
meant for in the Consumer Protection Act’ 2019, Say yes or no, describe your
answer in details, if any.
Question
no. 21 This is true that you are not
entitle to get any relief, until the petitioner no.2, seeks to get so far, Say
yes or no, describe your answer in details, if any.
Question
no. 22 This is true that the
Petitioner no.2, being co-applicant or borrower signed the Loan Documents lying
with the proforma opposite party, Say yes or no, describe your answer in
details, if any.
Question
no. 23 This is true that the
Petitioner no. 2, signed on the Agreement for Sale and in the Loan
documentation but did not sign in the petition of consumer complaint and
evidence on affidavit, submitted by you in the present consumer proceeding, Say
yes or no, describe your answer in details, if any.
Question
no. 24 This is true that in absence
of the petitioner no.2, the present consumer proceeding is not maintainable and
liable for rejection at once. Say yes or no, describe your answer in details,
if any.
Question
no. 25 Have you gone through the
contents of the Written Versions submitted by this opposite party ?
Question
no. 26 Have you gone through the contents
of the agreement for sale dated 23rd day of March’ 2017 ?
Question
no. 27 This is true that you
breached the said Agreement for Sale dated 23rd day of March’ 2017,
Say yes or no, describe your answer in details, if any.
Question
no. 28 This is true that you were
not interested to take the said subjected residential flat, say yes or no
describe your answer in details, if any.
Question
no. 29 This is true that you
concocted the story in placing the present consumer complaint, Say Yes or No, describe
your answer in details, if any.
Question
no. 30 This is true that you denied
the performance in terms of the Agreement for Sale dated 23rd day of
March’ 2017, Say yes or no, describe your answer in details, if any.
Question
no. 31 This is true that you resort
by way of the present consumer proceeding to take benefit of your own wrong,
which is contrary to the Law in the prescribed provisions of the Consumer
Protection Act’ 2019, Say Yes or No, describe your answer in details, if any.
Question
no. 32 This is true that the said
Agreement for Sale dated 23rd day of March’ 2017, is become
infructuous due to non-performance of the complainants, Say yes or no describe
your answer in details, if any.
Question
no. 33 This is true that there is no
cause has ever been described which may raise any allegation of deficiency in
services on this opposite party, say yes or no describe your answer in details,
if any.
Question
no. 34 This is true that there is no
cause of action has ever been accrued to place the present consumer complaint,
Say yes or no, describe your answer in details, if any.
Question
no. 35 This is true that this
opposite party intended to refund your money, say yes or no describe your
answer in details, if any.
Question
no. 36 This is true that this
opposite party entitle to deduct a sum of Rs. 1 Lakh while refunding your money
due to your breach of agreement and institution of the present consumer
proceeding against this opposite party, Say yes or no, describe your answer in
details, if any.
Question
no. 37 This is true that you are not
a Consumer as meant for in the Consumer Protection Act 2019, Say yes or no
describe your answer in details, if any.
Question no. 38 This is true that you cannot ask for any relief, in absence of
the Petitioner no. 2, herein. Say yes or no, describe your answer in details,
if any.
Question
no. 39 This is true that the present
consumer proceeding is liable to be dismissed, say yes or no describe your
answers, in details, if any.
___________________________XXX___________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment