An aggrieved person under Domestic
Violence Act – 2005 is entitled to ‘Monetary Relief ‘u/s 20 (i) of the Act,
with a rejoinder therein that such relief may include but is not limited to :-
a) Loss
of earnings
b) Medical
Expenses
c) The
Loss caused due to the destruction, damage or removal of any property from the
control of the “Aggrieved Person” and.
d) The
maintenance for the aggrieved person , as well as her children , if any
including an order of maintenance u/s 125 of the Cr.P.C or any other law for
the time being in force.
The definition of
“ monetary relief” as provided u/s 2(K) of the D V Act 2005 reads as under
(K) “Monetary
Relief” means the compensation which the magistrate may order the respondent to
pay to the “ aggrieved person” at any stage during the hearing of an
application, seeking any relief under this act to meet the expenses incurred
and losses suffered by the aggrieved person as a result of domestic violence.
The purpose and
implication of this section is that any relief claimed should be as a
compensation as a results of “domestic violence” only.
The maintainance
for the children of the aggrieved person, therefore can’t be ordered by the
magistrate as it does not come under this section, even it is claimed by the
applicant.
Para 2
To invoke the
provisions of Sec 125 of the Cr.P.C and to grant any such maintenance to the
children, the conditions of Sec. 125 (4) shall invariably be fulfilled more over to claim , such relief
u/s 125 of the Cr. P.C. the beneficiary children should be invariably and expressly
made as a ‘ party’ in the application u/s 12 of the D.V Act 2005, by the “
aggrieved person”.
Para 3 .
Any relief in the
kind of “maintenance” can’t be given suo-moto without making the beneficiaries
as the “respondents”
Para 4.
So long as the
marriage is subsisting a spouse can’t get any maintenance and Sec 125 of the
Cr.P.C can’t be invoked. Most importantly accordingly to the Sec. 18 of Hindu
adaptations and maintenance Act, a wife’s first duty to the husband is to fulfill
her marital obligations and to remain under his roof and protection.
Para 5.
Therefore the
monetary reliefs u/s (20) of the D V act is temporary in nature and is intended
to fulfill the monetary reliefs run concurrently till the disposal of the cases
and /or till such losses are fully reimbursed .
Once the case is
disposed off by the court deciding that the applicant is not an “ aggrieved
person” the applicant can’t claim any such relief even after the disposal of
the case and after paying the maintenance fully as ordered by the court . In
other words the grants of “ monetary reliefs “ u /s 20 of the D V Act 2005 is co-terminus with the judgment by the
courts ,please confirm the opinion URGENTLY.
No comments:
Post a Comment