Wednesday, October 29, 2025

EVIDENCE ON BEHALF OF I AND THE COMPLAINANT NO 2

 

BEFORE THE LEARNED DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLKATA UNIT-III

 

Consumer Complaint Case No.226 of 2024

 

Smt. Kakali Sen & ors 

…….Complainants 

-Versus- 

M/s. S.S. Construction & ors 

     ……Opposite Parties 

EVIDENCE ON BEHALF OF I AND THE COMPLAINANT NO 2

I, Kakali Sen wife of Sri Abhinandan Ghosh, aged about_years, by faith Hindu, by occupation - Service, permanent resident of Banshbari, P.O. Banshbari, P.S. - English Bazar, District- Malda,’ PIN-732201 and presently residing at D/82, Bapuji Nagar, P.O. Regent Estate, P.S. - Jadavpur, Kolkata-700092, do hereby solemnly affirm and say as follows :- 

1.   That I am the complainant No 1/petitioner No. 1 above named and I am duly empowered and authorized by complainant No. 2 to make and affirm this affidavit for me as well on behalf of complainant No. 2 and as such I am well acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case.

 

2.   . I and the complainant No 2 are law abiding and peace-loving citizens of India permanently and at present residing at A/61/2, Bapuji Nagar, P.O. – Regent Estate, P.S.- Jadavpur, Kolkata-700092 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said premises'). 

 

3.    I state that One Addya Prasad Dutta, since deceased, was the owner and occupier in respect of land measuring an area of about 4 Cottahs, a little more or less lying and situates at D/82, Bapuji Nagar, P.O. – Regent Estate, P.S. - Jadavpur, Kolkata-700092

 

4.   I state that the said Addya Prasad Dutta died on 17.1.1975 intestate leaving behind his wife Smt. Kiran Bala Dutta, who also died intestate, leaving her following legal heirs/ heiresses and successors: 

 

 (1) Sri Amrita Lal Dutta, son 

 (2) Sri Dhananjoy Dutta, son 

 (3) Sri Ajoy Dutta, son 

 (4) Sri Digbijoy Dutta, son 

 (5) Smt. Gopa Dutta, daughter 

 (6) Smt. Malina Dutta, daughter. 

 

5.   I state that the said heirs/heiresses of said Addiya Prasad Dutta and Smt. Kiran Bala Dutta, both said deceased, entered into a registered Development Agreement with the opposite party Nos. 1 and 2 (proprietor of opposite party no. 1) herein in respect of the said premises. The said development agreement was registered on 21st December, 2012 before the DSR-I, Alipore, registered in Book No. I, CD Volume No. 20, Pages 216 to 240, Being No. 04460 for the year 2012

 

6.    I state that along with the said development agreement, the owners thereof have made and executed a registered Power of Attorney in favour of the opposite party No. 2 herein (Sri Sujit Saha) for executing all necessary works for development of the said premises, which was also registered on the self-same date, i.e. 21.12.2012, before the DSR- I, Alipore and recorded in Book No. I, CD Volume No. 20, Pages 241 to 256, Being No. 04461 for the year 2012

 

7.   I state that as empowered by the said Power of Attorney mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the said opposite party no. 2 obtained sanctioned building plan from Kolkata Municipal Corporation for construction of a G+3 storied building on the said premises vide B.P. No. 2013100235 dated 03.01.2014 and started construction thereon. 

 

8.   I and the complainant No 2 herein have approached the opposite party no. 2 with an intention to purchase a flat along with a covered car parking space from the developer's allocation being Flat No. 2B on the southern side of first floor measuring an area of about 750 sq. fta little more or less super built up area consisting of 2 (two) bed rooms, one (one) kitchen, one drawing-cum-dining, 1 (one) toilet, 1 (one) WC, 1 (one) balcony and a covered car parking space measuring about 125 sq. ft. on the ground floor of the proposed G+3 storied building to be constructed by the opposite party no. 2 in the said premises. 

 

9.   I state that subsequently thereafter I and the complainant No 2 herein entered into a registered agreement for sale which was registered on 5th January, 2016 before the office of the DSR-I, Alipore, registered in Book No. I, Volume No. 1601/2016, Pages 1160 to 1210, Being No. 060100025 for the year 2016. 

 

10.       I and the complainant No 2 herein also tendered an amount of Rs.6,80,000/- in favour of the respondent No. 1 which was duly received by the proprietor of the opposite party No.1 being the opposite party no. 2 herein. The said transaction also forms part of the said registered agreement for sale and morefully mentioned in the Memo of Consideration of the said registered Agreement for Sale. 

 

11.       I state that after entering into the registered Agreement for Sale dated 5th January, 2016, more-fully mentioned in paragraph 8 hereof, I and the complainant No 2 herein also tendered two demand drafts being nos. 095491 and 095492 both dated 25.06.2016 amounting Rs. 85,000/- (rupees Eighty-Five Thousand only) and Rs. 75,000/- (rupees Seventy-Five Thousand only) respectively. 

 

12.      I state that it was agreed by and between the parties that the sale consideration would be Rs.42 Lakhs (Rupees Forty Two Lakhs only) and accordingly I and the complainant No 2 herein procured a loan to the tune of Rs.33,60,000/-(Rupees Thirty Three Lakh Sixty Thousand only) from the HDFC Bank for making payment towards the purchase of the said residential flat being Flat No. 2B on the southern side of first floor measuring an area of about 750 sq. ft. a little more or less super built up area along with a covered car parking space on the ground floor of the G+3 storied building proposed to be constructed at the premises No. D/82, Bapuji Nagar, P.O. Regent Estate, P.S. Jadavpur, Kolkata- 700092

 

13.       I do hereby state that the said flat, as agreed upon by and between the parties, that the said flat with all amenities, fixtures and fittings, to be handed over to I and the complainant No 2 herein within 2 years from the date of execution of the said agreement for sale, i.e. 5th January, 2016.

 

14.       I state that after completion of the basic construction of the said G+3 storied building in the said premises, I and the complainant No 2 were given possession of the said flat by the opposite party no. 2 measuring an area of about 750 sq. ft. super built up area along with the car parking space measuring about 125 sq. ft. in the ground floor of the said premises. 

 

15.       I state that despite having agreed to Rs.42,00,000/- (Rupees Forty Two Lakhs) towards full consideration price for sale of the said flat along with covered car parking space from I and the complainant No 2, the opposite party No. 2 neither facilitate I and the complainant No 2 an operating lift nor completed the construction of the covered car parking space, as agreed upon by and between the parties. It is pertinent to mention that the staircase leading to the first floor where I and the complainant No 2 reside is also under construction and all necessary fittings which were supposed to be given by the opposite party no. 2 were not provided with to I and the complainant No 2 yet.

 

16.       I state on or about September, 22 Int No. 2 requested the opposite party No. 2 to complete the constructions of the covered garage space as I and the complainant No 2 were facing difficulties to park their vehicle inside the garage for which the opposite party No. 2 asked I and the complainant No 2 herein to pay an extra amount to the tune of Rs.50,000/-. Accordingly, without going into further controversy, I and the complainant No 2 herein with good faith handed over an extra sum of Rs.50,000/- to the opposite party No. 2. 

 

17.      I state in spite of receiving such amount, the opposite party No. 2 did not till date pay any heed for completion of such works within the said garage.

 

18.      I state since taking over possession of the said allocated flat being Flat No. 2B on the southern side of first floor of the said Premises No. D/82, Bapuji Nagar, P.O. Regent Estate, P.S. Jadavpur, Kolkata- 700092 where I and the complainant No 2 are residing along with the incomplete/ under constructed garage space, I and the complainant No 2 herein repeatedly requested the opposite party No. 2 to execute the necessary deed of conveyance in favour of I and the complainant No 2. However, despite such repeated requests and assurance given by the opposite party No. 2, the opposite party No. 2 has not only failed and neglected to execute the necessary deed of conveyance in favour of I and the complainant No 2 but also denied to complete the construction work in the said premises.

 

19.       I and the complainant No 2 submits that such inaction of the respondents to register the necessary deed of conveyance is not only prejudicing I and the complainant No 2 but also creating unnecessary delay in getting the clear title in respect of the said property, inasmuch as the opposite parties have not any defense in the instant complaint. 

 

20.       I state that having no other alternative, I and the complainant No 2 sent a notice dated 07.2.2024 through his learned advocate requesting the opposite party no. 2 to make and execute the registered deed of conveyance in respect of the said flat measuring about 750 sq. ft. and covered car parking space (measuring 125 sq. ft.) lying and situates a D/82, Bapuji Nagar, P.O. Regent Estate, P.S. - Jadavpur, Kolkata-700092

 

21.      I state that the said notice was duly received by the opposite party Nos. 1 and 2 on 09.02.2024. Despite receipt of the said notice neither the opposite party No. 2 responded to such letter nor given any assurance in respect of the execution of the said deed of conveyance in favour of I and the complainant No 2 herein.

 

22.      I and the complainant No 2 state that apart from the above, the opposite parties having received in excess of the entire consideration price for the said flat and the covered car parking space as per the registered agreement for sale dated 5th January, 2016, has failed and neglected to make and execute the necessary deed of conveyance in favour of I and the complainant No 2 herein and thus till date no title has been created in favour of I and the complainant No 2 and they are mere trespassers in respect of the said flat and the car parking space involved in this instant lis.

 

23.      I state that although the entire consideration price has been paid between 08.9.2015 to 27.12.2022 and also an excess payment has been made to the tune of Rs.50,000/-, but by reason of non-execution of the necessary deed of conveyance, valuation of the property has been increased to a great extent as of today vis-à-vis the year 2016 which will result to in incurring of excess stamp duties and registration expenses, which should be borne by the opposite parties. 

 

24.      I submit that the acts and actions of the opposite parties as complained of hereinabove is a clear and complete violation of the contract (registered agreement for sale dated 05.1.2016 by and between the parties). 

 

25.      I submit that the acts and actions of the opposite parties as complained of hereinabove is a glaring example of gross negligence and deficiency in service towards I and the complainant No 2 and for the acts, as aforesaid, I and the complainant No 2 have suffered tremendous mental agony, pain, anxiety and unnecessary harassment and as such, I and the complainant no 2 are entitled to the reliefs, as prayed for herein, with adequate compensation. 

 

26.      I and the complainant no 2 submit that the acts and actions of the opposite parties as complained of hereinabove, are arbitrary to the core, malafide, erroneous and gross violation of my and the complainant No 2 legal rights of, which amounts to unfair trade practice. 

 

27.       I further submits that I and the complainant No 2 have a very good case and there is a fair chance of success in the instant case and the balance of convenience and inconvenience is absolutely in favour of me and the complainant No 2 herein

 

28.      I state that upon due execution of the necessary deed of conveyance from the concerned registering office where the sale deed would be executed, the opposite parties be also directed to complete the construction of the building along with to facilitate the lift as per the terms of the said development agreement within such time as this Learned Commission may deem fit and proper. 

 

29.       I state that the cause of action in the instant case has arisen on 08.9.2015 to 27.12.2022 when the entire consideration has been paid by I and the complainant No 2 to the opposite parties and the same has been continuing from day to day basis and the registered office of the opposite party No. 1 and the residential address of the opposite party No. 2 is situated within the jurisdiction of this Learned Commission and as such Learned Commission has got pecuniary as well territorial jurisdiction to entertain our case of . 

 

30.       I state that no part of the cause of action of the complaint is barred by the Law of Limitation. 

 

 

31.      I and the complainant no 2 pray for reliefs as per the prayer mentioned in the complaint unless orders are passed, as prayed for herein, otherwise I and the complainant No 2 will suffer irreparable loss and injury. 

 

32.       I and the complainant No 2 do hereby take this opportunity to deny and dispute the statements made in the Written Version in the manner indicated hereunder :

A. It is denied that the said Power of Attorney empowered the attorney to enter into any Agreement for Sale and to execute Deed of Conveyance in respect of the said property to any intending Purchasers. 

B. It is denied that the Consumer Complainants have taken money back on 24/01/2016 by Cheque No. 184751 dated 24/01/2016, for a sum of Rs. 3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs) only, and subsequently taken a sum of Rs. 75,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Thousand) only, in cash from this Opposite Party. It is further denied that the Complainants have paid total sum of money as Rs. 38,75,000/- (Rupees Thirty Eight Lakhs and Seventy Five Thousand) only, towards the consideration value of the said subjected flat. It is denied that the Opposite Party is to get the balance sum of money as of Rs. 3,25,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs and Twenty Five Thousand) only, from the Complainants. It is denied that the Complainants are not due diligent in making payment of the consideration value of the subjected flat in terms of the agreement for sale dated 5th day of January 2016, even after handing over the Physical Possession of the said subjected flat by the Opposite Parties. 

C. It is denied that the said flat, as agreed upon by and between the parties, that the said flat with all amenities, fixtures and fittings to be handed over to the complaints herein within years from the date of execution of the said agreement for sale, i.e. 5th January 2016

D. It is denied that after completion of the basic construction of the said G+3 storied building in the said premises, the complainants were given possession of the said flat by the opposite party no. 2 measuring an area of about 750 sq.ft. super built up area along with the car parking space measuring about 125 sq. ft. in the ground floor of the said premises. 

E. It is denied that after the Complainants enjoyed without any hindrances, so far. It is denied that the complainants did not arrange themselves for the registration of Deed of Conveyance in terms of the said Agreement for Sale dated 5th day of January 2016 or did not pay their balance sum of money of the consideration value of the said subjected flat which comes as a sum of Rs. 3,25,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs and Twenty Five Thousand) only. 

F. It is denied that the Opposite Party is all along ready and willing to register the deed of conveyance in terms of the said Agreement for Sale dated 5th day of January' 2016. 

G. It is denied that the complainants are not a Consumer as per provision of Section 2 (7) of the Consumer Protection Act' 2019

H. It is denied that there is no Consumer disputes to be adjudicated between the parties, before the Hon'ble Commission, between the parties herein

I. It is denied that the present claim of the Complainants is barred by the Limitation as enshrined under the provision of Section 69 of the Consumer Protection Act' 2019

J. It is denied that the Opposite Party, have no iota of knowledge about the alleged story of the complainant herein.

K. It is denied that the Opposite party, have no relationship with the complainant. 

L. It is denied that the opposite party, have no disputes. 

M. It is denied that the present Consumer disputes, is not maintainable in the facts and in the law against the opposite party, in the terms of the Consumer Protection Act' 2019.

N. It is denied that the allegations as contended by the complainants herein are all fake and frivolous one, as those are not substantiated with any single piece of papers or evidentiary value papers, against this opposite party. 

O. It is denied that the present complaint has been made before the Hon'ble Commission, motivated and with an intention for the wrongful gain and acquire of wrongful claim thereby the complainants herein.

P. It is denied that the Opposite Party, herein did not cause any deficiency in services, and or unfair trade practices, in terms of the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act' 2019, and rules made thereof

Q. It is denied that there is no cause of action has ever been described and or more particularly raised against this opposite party, by the complainant. 

33.      I am filing the following documents along with my evidence in order to substantiate my case and I shall hand over the said original documents to the Learned court as and when directed, copies of same annexed to complaint. 

a. A photocopy of the said registered agreement for sale registered on 5th January, 2016 before the office of the DSR-I, Alipore, registered in Book No. I, Volume No. 1601/2016, Pages 1160 to 1210, Being No. 060100025 for the year 2016. 

b. A photocopy of the Money receipt issued by the opposite party no2 on behalf of the opposite party no. 1 dated 25.06.2016 

c. A copy of the loan sanction letter along with the bank loan statement of complainant no. 2 

d. Some photographs of the said under construction building 

e. A receipt showing payment of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) towards the opposite party no. 1 along with photograph of the garage showing the present situation 

f. A track consignment showing the receipt of the said notice dated 07.2.2024 along with the notice dated 07.2.2024 sent by I and the complainant No 2' advocate 

34.      That the statements made in the foregoing paragraphs of this affidavit of evidence is all true to the best of my knowledge and belief . 

 

 

 

 

DEPONENT

Identified by me

Advocate

Prepared in my office 

Advocate 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment