The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Act 1 of 1894
- Published on 15 August 1965
- Commenced on 15 August 1965
- [This is the version of this document from 15 August 1965.]
- [Note: The original publication document is not available and this content could not be verified.]
- [Amended by The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1962 (Act 31 of 1962) on 1 January 1962]
046.
Statement of Objects and Reasons.-For past several years the amendment of the Land Acquisition Act, 1870, has been under consideration by the Government of India in communication with local Governments.Before the passing of that Act, the valuation of lands, which it was found necessary to take up for the execution of public works, was entirely in the hands of arbitrators, from whose decision there was no appeal. This system led to a lamentable waste of the public money, both because the arbitrators were incompetent, and sometimes, it is to be feared corrupt, and also because the law, as it then stood, laid down no instructions for their guidance in the performance of their duties. This latter defect, among others, was remedied by the Act of 1870, which it is now proposed to amend, and which contains detailed instructions as to the matters which are to be considered, and which are to be neglected, in awards of compensation for lands acquired under its provisions. The Act of 1870 also provided for the abolition of the system under which uncontrolled direction was entrusted to arbitrators; and, in lieu thereof, required the Collector when unable to come to terms with the persons interested in land which it was desired to take up, to refer the difference for the decision of a Civil Court, usually that of the District Judge. In the disposal of such references, the Court is aided by Assessors, and its finding is final if the Judge and one or more of the Assessors agree. If, however, the Judge and the Assessors disagree, an appeal is allowed, which usually lies to the High Court.The Act of 1870 has not, in practice, been found entirely effective for the protection either of the persons interested in lands taken up or of the public purse. The requirement that the Collector shall refer for the decision of the Court every petty difference of opinion as to value, and every case in which any one or perhaps a large number of persons fail to attend before him, has involved in litigation, with all its trouble and delay and expense, a great number of persons whose interest in the land was extremely insignificant. It has, in fact, frequently been the case that the owners of small pieces of land have had to pay Court cost to an amount far exceeding the value of the land itself.On the other hand, the provisions of the Act as to the incidence of costs, the whole of which fall on the Collector if the final award is ever so little in excess of the amount of his tender, are such as to encourage extravagant and speculative claims. The change of altogether escaping the payment of costs is so great, that claimants are in the position of risking very little in order to gain very much and have, therefore, every motive to refuse even liberal offers made by the Collector, and to try their luck by compelling a reference to the Court. Much the same may be said as to the provisions of the existing law regarding the payment of interest. No matter how fair the original offer of the Collector and how groundless the refusal to accept the compensation he has tendered, interest is payable on the amount of the award finally arrived at from the date of the Collector's taking possession of the land. This may be for a period of two or three years, and as interest continues to run until the litigation is finally completed, it is to be advantage of the land owner to protract the proceedings to the utmost. All this costs a very heavy and undeserved burden on the public purse.It is proposed, therefore, to amend the law by making the Collector's award final, unless altered by a decree in a regular suit. Persons interested in land taken up for public works will thus still have the opportunity, if they desire it, of preferring to an authority quite independent of the Collector their claims to more substantial compensation than the Collector has awarded; and will, in all cases, have a further right of appeal to the regular appellate Courts. They will no longer, however, be encouraged to litigate by the feeling that they can hardly lose, but may make a great gain by doing so.This change in the procedure for determining the valuation of land taken up for public works will also render it possible to dispense with the services of the Assessors, who are now supposed to assist the Court. Considering the difficulty, almost throughout the country, of obtaining the services of such Assessors as are really qualified to form a sound opinion on the subject of the valuation of land, it is believed that the proposal to dispense with them, and to leave the matter to the sole arbitrament, first of the Collector, and then of the Judge, will in no way diminish the efficiency of the Courts in enquiries in which the value of lands is in issue. It will certainly tend to shorten litigation and to diminish its expense.Amendment Act 31 of 1962-Statement of Objects and Reasons.-Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, land may be acquired for a public purpose as also for companies. The purposes for which acquisition of land for companies may be made are, however, restricted and they have been specified in section 40(1) of the Act. Such acquisition may be made for obtaining land (a) for the construction of dwelling-houses for workmen or for the provision of amenities directly connected therewith; or (b) for the construction of some work which is likely to prove useful to the public.2. Section 40(1)(b) and section 41 of the Land Acquisition Act came up for consideration before the Supreme Court in the case of R.L. Aurora v. State of Uttar Pradesh A.I.R. 1962 S.C. 764. The Supreme Court held that land can be acquired for a company under section 40(1)(b) read with section 41 of the Act only when the work to be constructed would be directly useful to the public and the public would be entitled to use the work as of right for its own benefit in accordance with the terms of the agreement. In the various States, land has been acquired for companies engaged in industries which are likely to promote economic development of the country or which are essential to the life of the community. Doubts have arisen as to the validity of such acquisition.3. Some State Governments have represented that the aforesaid decision of the Supreme Court may have far-reaching consequences in respect of acquisition of land for companies. It is feared that the decision may render planned development of industries extremely difficult and also that there will be danger that the acquisition of land made for companies in the past might be questioned in Courts of law and claims may be made by previous owners whose lands have been acquired for restoration of land or payment of damages. In order to overcome these difficulties, the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Ordinance, 1962 was promulgated on the 20th July 1962, suitably amending sections 40 and 41 of the Act and also validating all past acquisition of land made for companies.Amendment Act 13 of 1967-Statement of Objects and Reasons.-In acquisition of land for big projects, the practice generally followed under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is that a single notification is issued under section 4(1) of the Act which indicates that a particular area of land is needed or is likely to be needed for a public purpose. This is then followed by one or more declarations under section 6 of the Act in respect of the land specified in the aforesaid notification to the effect that such land is needed for a public purpose or for a company, as and when the plans are completed for the various stages of the project, e.g., plant, township and ancillary requirements.2. In their judgment dated 9th February 1966, in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh v. Vishnu Prasad Sharma, the Supreme Court held that once a declaration under section 6 of the Act is issued, whether it be in respect of a part of the land comprised in the notification under section 4(1) or in respect of the whole of it, the effect of initial notification is exhausted and no further declarations under section 6 of the Act are sustainable. In other words, Government cannot acquire land by means of successive declarations following the notification under section 4(1) in respect of a particular area. The Supreme Court has construed the acts done under sections 4, 5-A and 6 of the Act as part and parcel of a single process.3. The above decision of the Supreme Court, however, has the effect of upsetting a large number of proceedings for land acquisition for various public purposes throughout the country as in most cases of bigger projects, acquisition has been done in stages consistent with the requirements of the situation and a single notification under section 4(1) has been followed with more than one declaration under section 6 of the Act. It was not possible to reopen all such cases and to start proceedings afresh as it would have seriously dislocated projects for which land had been acquired and compensation paid.4. Consequently, to overcome the adverse effect of the Supreme Court judgment and in view of the urgency of the situation affecting many important projects, the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was amended with retrospective effect by the promulgation of the Land Acquisition (Amendment and Validation) Ordinance, 1967, on the 20th January 1967, to provide for submission of either one report in respect of the land which has been notified under section 4(1) or different reports in respect of different parcels of such land to the appropriate Government containing the recommendations of the Collector(s) on the objections submitted by the interested persons under section 5-A(1) of the Act to the acquisition of the land covered by the notification under section 4(1) or of any land in the locality, as the case may be. The Ordinance specifically provides that, if necessary, more than one declaration may be issued from time to time in respect of different parcels of any land covered by the same notification under section 4, sub-section (1) of the Act irrespective of the fact whether one report or different reports has or have been made under section 5-A, sub-section (2) of the Act.5. At the same time, care has been taken to ensure that land acquisition proceedings do not linger on for unduly long time. The aforesaid Ordinance, therefore, provides that no declaration under section 6 of the Act should be issued in respect of any particular land covered by a notification under section 4(1) published after the commencement of the Ordinance, after the expiry of three years from date of such publication. In case of pending proceedings it has been provided that no declaration under section 6 of the Act in respect of any land which has been notified before the commencement of the above Ordinance, under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Act, may be issued after the expiry of two years from the commencement of the Ordinance.Amendment Act 68 of 1984-Statement of Objects and Reasons.-With the enormous expansion of the State's role in promoting public welfare and economic development since independence, acquisition of land for public purposes, industrialisation, building of institutions, etc., has become far more numerous than ever before. While this is inevitable, promotion of public purpose has to be balanced with the rights of the individual whose land is acquired, thereby often depriving him of his means of livelihood. Again, acquisition of land for private enterprises ought not to be placed on the same footing as acquisition for the State or for an enterprise under it. The individual and institutions who are unavoidably to be deprived of their property rights in land need to be adequately compensated for the loss keeping in view the sacrifice they have to make for the larger interests of the community. The pendency of acquisition proceedings for long periods often causes hardship to the affected parties and renders unrealistic the scale of compensation offered to them.2. It is necessary, therefore, to restructure the legislative framework for acquisition of land so that it is more adequately informed by this objective of serving the interests of the community in harmony with the rights of the individual. Keeping the above objects in view and considering the recommendations of the Law Commission, the Land Acquisition Review Committee as well as the State Governments, institutions and individuals, proposals for amendment to the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, were formulated and a Bill for this purpose was introduced in the Lok Sabha on the 30th April, 1982. The same has not been passed by either House of Parliament. Since the introduction of the Bill, various other proposals for amendment of the Act have been received and they have also been considered in consultation with State Governments and other agencies. It is now proposed to include all these proposals in a fresh Bill after withdrawing the pending Bill. The main proposals for amendment are as follows:-(i) The definition of "public purpose" as contained in the Act is proposed to be so amended as to include a longer illustrative list retaining, at the same time, the inclusive character of the definition.(ii) Acquisition of land for non-Government companies under the Act will henceforth be made in pursuance of Part VII of the Act in all cases.(iii) A time-limit of one year is proposed to be provided for completion of all formalities between the issue of the preliminary notification under section 4(1) of the Act and the declaration for acquisition of specified land under section 6(1) of the Act.(iv) It is proposed to provide that the Collector shall, before making his award, obtain the previous approval of the appropriate Government or any officer of that Government authorised in this behalf. Provision has also been included to empower the Collector to make the award without any enquiry if the persons interested in the acquisition agree in writing on the matters to be included in the award of the Collector in the form prescribed by rules made under the Act.(v) It is proposed to provide for a period of two years from the date of publication of the declaration under section 6 of the Act within which the Collector should make his award under the Act. If no award is made within that period, the entire proceedings for the acquisition of the land would lapse. He has also been empowered to correct clerical or arithmetical mistakes in the award within a certain period from the date of the award.(vi) The circumstances under which the Collector should take possession of the land before the award is made in urgent cases are being enlarged to include a larger variety of public purposes.(vii) The appropriate Government is being empowered to call for the record of any order passed by the Collector at any time before he makes an award for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the legality or propriety of such order passed.(viii) Solatium now payable at the rate of fifteen per centum of the market value of the land acquired in consideration of the compulsory nature of the acquisition, is proposed to be increased to thirty per centum. Similarly, the rate of interest payable on the excess compensation awarded by the Court and on the compensation in cases where possession of land is taken before payment of compensation, are also proposed to be increased substantially.(ix) Considering that the right of reference to the Civil Court under section 18 of the Act is not usually taken advantage of by inarticulate and poor people and is usually exercised only by the comparatively affluent land owners and that this causes considerable inequality in the payment of compensation for the same or similar quality of land to different interested parties, it is proposed to provide an opportunity to all aggrieved parties whose land is covered under the same notification to seek re-determination of compensation, once any one of them has obtained orders for payment of higher compensation from the reference Court under section 18 of the Act.(x) As a large number of cases for the acquisition of land are pending before various authorities for a very long time and payment of the market value of the land obtaining on the date of the preliminary notification under section 4 of the Act in respect of such land is likely to be unrealistic and iniquitous, it is proposed to provide for payment of simple interest at ten per centum per annum on the amount of compensation for the period commencing from the date of issue of the notification under section 4 of the Act to the date of tender of payment or deposit of compensation awarded by the Collector in respect of all pending proceedings on the 30th April, 1982, the date when the earlier Bill for the amendment of the Act was introduced in the House of the People.[2nd February, 1894]An Act to amend the law for the acquisition of land for public purposes and for companies.Whereas it is expedient to amend the law for the acquisition of land needed for public purposes and for companies and for determining the amount of compensation to be made on account of such acquisition; It is hereby enacted as follows:| The Land Acqusition Act has now been extended to the Union Territories of Dadra and Nagar Haveli by Regn. 6 of 1963; Pondicherry by Regn. 7 of 1963;Goa, Daman and Diu by Regn.11 of 1963 and Laccadive, Minicoy and Amindivi Islands by Regn. 8 of 1965.The Amendments made to the Act in its application to the Bombay area of the State of Gujarat by Section 2 of Bombay Act 18 of 1938, by Sections 2 to 4 of Bombay Act 20 of 1945, by Section 6 of Bombay Act 35 of 1949, by Section 2 of Bombay Act 27 of 1950, by Sections 2 of 11 of Bombay Act 35 of 1953 and by Section 2 of Bombay Act 1 of 1958, have been extended to the whole of that State by the Land Acquisition (Gujarat Unification and Amendment) Act 20 of 1965, with effect from 15th August, 1965.The Act and the Rules made thereunder as in force in the Bombay area of the State of Maharashtra except the Bombay Amendment Act 4 of 1948, have been extended to the whole of that State by the Land Acquisition (Maharahtra Extension and Amendment) Act 38 of 1964, with effect from 7th December, 1964. This Act has repealed the Bombay Amendment Act 17 of 1960 and the Act as in force in the Hyderabad area of that State.The Act as in force in the Mahakoshall region of the State of Madhya Pradesh before 1st January, 1950, has been extended with effect from that date to all other regisions of that State by the M.P. Extension of Laws Act 23 of 1958.The Act has been extended to the new provinces and merged States by the Merged States (Laws) Act 59 of 1949 and to the States of Manipur, Tripura and Vindhya Pradesh by the Union Territories (Laws) Act 30 of 1950. Manipur and Tripura are full-fledged States now, see Act 81 of 1971.The Act as amended from time to time by the State Legislature of Punjab has been extended from 3rd April, 1957 to the Pepsu territories transferred to the State of Punjab, by Punjab Act 5 of 1957.The Act shall cease to apply to the Malabar district of the State of Kerala  See Section 62, Kerala Land Acquisition Act 21 of 1962 with effect from 1st April, 1963.The Act has been extended to the transferred territory of Kanyakumari district and shencottahtaluk of Tirnelveli district in the State of Tamil Nadu by Tamil Nadu Act 23 of 1960. | 
Part I – Preliminary
1.
Short title, extent and commencement .(1) This Act may be called The Land Acquisition Act, 1894.2.
. Repeal and saving.[Repealed partly by the Repealing and Amending Act, 1914 (10 of 1914), section 3 and Schedule II and partly by the Repealing Act, 1938 (1 of 1938), section 2 and Schedule.]3.
. Definitions.In this Act, unless there is something repugnant in the subject or context,Part II – Acquisition
Preliminary investigation4. Publication of preliminary notification and powers of officers thereupon
5. Payment for damage
.The officer so authorised shall at the time of such entry pay or tender payment for all necessary damage to be done as aforesaid, and in case of dispute as to the sufficiency of the amount so paid or tendered, he shall at once refer the dispute to the decision of the Collector or other Chief Revenue Officer of the District, and such decision shall be final.[Objections [Inserted by Act 38 of 1923, Section 3.]5.
-A. Hearing of objections6. Declaration that land is required for a public purpose
7. After declaration Collector to take order for acquisition
.Whenever any land shall have been so declared to be needed for a public purpose or for a company, the appropriate Government, or some officer authorised by the appropriate Government in this behalf, shall direct the Collector to take order for the acquisition of the land.8. Land to be marked out, measured and planned
.The Collector shall thereupon cause the land (unless it has been already marked out under section 4), to be marked out. He shall also cause it to be measured, and (if no plan has been made thereof), a plan to be made of the same.9. Notice to persons interested
10. Power to require and enforce the making of statements as to names and interests
11. Enquiry and award by Collector
.[(1)] [Section 11 renumbered as sub-Section (1) thereof by Act 68 of 1984, Section 8 (w.e.f. 24.9.1984).] On the day so fixed, or on any other day to which the enquiry has been adjourned, the Collector shall proceed to enquire into the objection (if any) which any person interested has stated pursuant to a notice given under section 9 to the measurements made under section 8, and into the value of the land [at the date of the publication of the notification under section 4, sub-section (1)] [Inserted by Act 38 of 1923, Section 5.], and into the respective interest of the persons claiming the compensation and shall make an award under his hand of(i)the true area of the land;(ii)the compensation which in his opinion should be allowed for the land; and(iii)the apportionment of the said compensation among all the persons known or believed to be interested in the land, of whom, or of whose claims, he has information, whether or not they have respectively appeared before him:[Provided that no award shall be made by the Collector under this sub-section without the previous approval of the appropriate Government or of such officer as the appropriate Government may authorise in this behalf:Provided further that it shall be competent for the appropriate Government to direct that the Collector may make such award without such approval in such class of cases as the appropriate Government may specify in this behalf.] [Inserted by Act 38 of 1923, Section 5.]12. Award of Collector when to be final
13. Adjournment of enquiry
.The Collector may, for any cause he thinks fit, from time to time adjourn the enquiry to a day to be fixed by him.[13-A. Correction of clerical errors, etc [Inserted by Act 69 of 1984, Section 10 (w.e.f. 24.9.1984).]14. Power to summon and enforce attendance of witnesses and production of documents
.For the purpose of enquiries under this Act the Collector shall have powers to summon and enforce the attendance of witnesses, including the parties interested or any of them, and to compel the production of documents by the same means, and (so far as may be) in the same manner, as is provided in the case of a Civil Court under the [Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908)] [Substituted by Act 68 of 1984, Section 11, for " Code of Civil Procedure" (w.e.f. 24.9.1984).].15. Matters to be considered and neglected
.In determining the amount of compensation, the Collector shall be guided by the provisions contained in sections 23 and 24.[15-A. Power to call for records, etc [Inserted by Act 68 of 1984, Section 12 (w.e.f. 24.9.1984).].The appropriate Government may at any time before the award is made by the Collector under section 11call for any record of any proceedings (whether by way of enquiry or otherwise)for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the legality or propriety of any finding or order passed or as to the regularity of such proceedings and may pass such order or issue such direction in relation thereto as it may think fit:Provided that the appropriate Government shall not pass or issue any order or direction prejudicial to any person without affording such person a reasonable opportunity of being heard.]Taking possession16. Power to take possession
.When the Collector has made an award under section 11, he may take possession of the land, which shall thereupon [vest absolutely in the [Government] [Substituted by A.O.1937.]], free from all encumbrances.17. Special powers in cases of urgency
Part III – Reference To Court And Procedure Thereon
18. Reference to Court
19. Collectors statement to the Court
20. Service of notice
.The Court shall thereupon cause a notice specifying the day on which the Court will proceed to determine the objection, and directing their appearance before the Court on that day, to be served on the following persons, namely:21. Restriction on scope of proceedings
.The scope of the inquiry in every such proceeding shall be restricted to a consideration of the interests of the persons affected by the objection.22. Proceedings to be in open Court
.Every such proceeding shall take place in open Court, and all persons entitled to practise in any Civil Court in the State shall be entitled to appear, plead and act (as the case may be) in such proceeding.23. Matters to be considered in determining compensation
24. Matters to be neglected in determining compensation
.But the Court shall not take into considerationfirst , the degree of urgency which has led to the acquisition;secondly , any disinclination of the person interested to part with the land acquired;thirdly , any damage sustained by him which, if caused by a private person, would not render such person liable to a suit;fourthly , any damage which is likely to be caused to the land acquired, after the date of the publication of the declaration under section 6, by or in consequence of the use to which it will be put;fifthly , any increase to the value of the land acquired likely to accrue from the use to which it will be put when acquired;sixthly , any increase to the value of the other land of the person interested likely to accrue from the use to which the land acquired, will be put; [*] [The word "or" omitted by Act 68 of 1984, Section 16 (w.e.f. 24.9.1984).]seventhly , any outlay or improvements on, or disposal of, the land acquired, commenced, made or effected without the sanction of the Collector after the date of the publication of the [notification under section 4, sub-section (1)] [Substituted by Act 38 of 1923, Section 8, for " declaration under section 6" .]; [or] [Inserted by Act 68 of 1984, Section 16 (w.e.f. 24.9.1984).][eighthly , any increase to the value of the land on account of its being put to any use which is forbidden by law or opposed to public policy.] [Inserted by Act 68 of 1984, Section 16 (w.e.f. 24.9.1984).]25. [ Amount of compensation awarded by Court not to be lower than the amount awarded by the Collector [Substituted by Act 68 of 1984, Section 17, for Section 25 (w.e.f. 24.9.1984).]
.The amount of compensation awarded by the Court shall not be less than the amount awarded by the Collector under section 11.]26. Form of awards
.[(1)] [Section 26 renumbered as sub-Section(1) thereof and sub-Section (2) added by Act 19 of 1921, Section 2.] Every award under this part shall be in writing signed by the Judge, and shall specify the amount awarded under clause first of sub-section (1) of section 23, and also the amounts (if any)respectively awarded under each of the other clauses of the same sub-section, together with the grounds of awarding each of the said amounts.27. Costs
28. Collector may be directed to pay interest on excess compensation
.If the sum which, in the opinion of the Court, the Collector ought to have awarded as compensation is in excess of the sum which the Collector did award as compensation, the award of the Court may direct that the Collector shall pay interest on such excess at the rate of [nine per centum] [Substituted by Act 68 of 1984, Section 18, for " six per centum" (w.e.f. 24.9.1984).] per annum from the date on which he took possession of the land to the date of payment of such excess into Court:[Provided that the award of the Court may also direct that where such excess or any part thereof is paid into Court after the date of expiry of a period of one year from the date on which possession is taken, interest at the rate of fifteen per centum per annum shall be payable from the date of expiry of the said period of one year on the amount of such excess or part thereof which has not been paid into Court before the date of such expiry.] [Inserted by Act 68 of 1984, Section 18 (w.e.f. 24.9.1984).][28-A. Re-determination of the amount of compensation on the basis of the award of the Court [Inserted by Act 68 of 1984, Section 19 (w.e.f. 24.9.1984).]Part IV – Apportionment Of Compensation
29.
Particulars of apportionment to be specified .Where there are several persons interested, if such persons agree in the apportionment of the compensation, the particulars of such apportionment shall be specified in the award, and as between such persons the award shall be conclusive evidence of the correctness of the apportionment.30. Dispute as to apportionment
.When the amount of compensation has been settled under section 11, if any dispute arises as to the apportionment of the same or any part thereof, or as to the persons to whom the same or any part thereof, is payable, the Collector may refer such dispute to the decision of the Court.Part V – Payment
31. P
ayment of compensation or deposit of same in Court .(1) On making an award under section 11, the Collector shall tender payment of the compen-sation awarded by him to the persons interested entitled thereto according to the award and shall pay it to them unless prevented by some one or more of the contingencies mentioned in the next sub-section.32. Investment of money deposited in respect of lands belonging to persons incompetent to alienate
33. Investment of money deposited in other cases
.When any money shall have been deposited in Court under this Act for any cause other than mentioned in the last preceding section, the Court may, on the application of any party interested or claiming an interest in such money, order the same to be invested in such Government or other approved securities as it may think proper, and may direct the interest or other proceeds of any such investment to be accumulated and paid in such manner as it may consider will give the parties interested therein the same benefit therefrom as they might have had from the land in respect whereof such money shall have been deposited or as near thereto as may be.34. Payment of interest
.When the amount of such compensation is not paid or deposited on or before taking possession of the land, the Collector shall pay the amount awarded with interest thereon at the rate of [nine per centum] [Substituted by Act 68 of 1984, Section 20, for " six per centum" (w.e.f. 24.9.1984).] per annum from the time of so taking possession until it shall have been so paid or deposited:[Provided that if such compensation or any part thereof is not paid or deposited within a period of one year from the date on which possession is taken, interest at the rate of fifteen per centum per annum shall be payable from the date of expiry of the said period of one year on the amount of compensation or part thereof which has not been paid or deposited before the date of such expiry.] [Inserted by Act 68 of 1984, Section 20 (w.e.f. 24.9.1984).]Part VI – Temporary Occupation Of Land
35. Temporary occupation of waste or arable land. Procedure when difference as to compensation exists
36. Power to enter and take possession, and compensation on restoration
37. Difference as to condition of land
.In case the Collector and persons interested differ as to the condition of the land at the expiration of the term, or as to any matter connected with the said agreement, the Collector shall refer such difference to the decision of the Court.Part VII – Acquisition Of Land For Companies
38.
Company may be authorised to enter and survey .[Omitted by the Land Acquisition (Amendment)Act, 1984 (68 of 1984), section 21 (w.e.f. 24-9-1984).][38-A. Industrial concern to be deemed company for certain purposes [Inserted by Act 16 of 1933, Section 2.].An industrial concern, ordinarily employing not less than one hundred workmen owned by an individual or by an association of individuals and not being a company, desiring to acquire land for the erection of dwelling-houses for workmen employed by the concern or for the provision of amenities directly connected therewith shall, so far as concerns the acquisition of such land, be deemed to be a company for the purposes of this Part, and the references to company in [sections 4, 5-A, 6, 7 and 50] shall be interpreted as references also to such concern.]39. Previous consent of appropriate Government and execution of agreement necessary
.The provisions of [sections 6 to 16 (both inclusive)] [Substituted by Act 68 of 1984, Section 23, for " sections 6 to 37 (both inclusive)" (w.e.f. 24.9.1984).] and sections 18 to 37 (both inclusive) shall not be put in force in order to acquire land for any company [under this part] [Inserted by Act 68 of 1984, Section 23 (w.e.f. 24.9.1984).], unless with the previous consent of the [appropriate Government] [Substituted by A.O.1950.], nor unless the company shall have executed the agreement hereinafter mentioned.40. Previous enquiry
41. Agreement with appropriate Government
.[* * *] [The words " Such officer shall report to the Local Government the result of the enquirty, and" repealed by Act 38 of 1923, Section 10.] If the [appropriate Government] [Substituted by Act 16 of 1933, Section 3, for Cls.(a) and (b).] is satisfied [after considering the report, if any, of the Collector under section 5-A, sub-section (2), or on the report of the officer making an inquiry under section 40] [Inserted by Act 38 of 1923, Section 10.] that [the proposed acquisition is for any of the purposes referred to in clause (a) or clause (aa) or clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 40] [Substituted by Act 31 of 1962, Section 4, for certain words (w.e.f. 12.7.1962).], it shall [* * *] [The words " subject to such rules as the Governor-General in Council may from time to time prescribe in this behalf" repealed by Act 38 of 1920, Section 2 and Sch.I.] require the company to enter into an agreement [with the [appropriate Government] [Substituted by A.O.1937, for certain words.]], providing to the satisfaction of the [appropriate Government] [Substituted by Act 16 of 1933, Section 3, for Cls.(a) and (b).] for the following matters, namely:| Additional Information6 | 
| Section 165 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (36 of 2003) provides as under:-"165. Amendment of Sections 40 and 41 of Act 1 of 1894.-(1) In section 40, sub-section (1), clause (b) and section 41, sub-section (5) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (1 of 1894), the term "work" shall be deemed to include electricity supplied or to be supplied by means of the work to be constructed.(2) The Appropriate Government may, on recommendation of the Appropriate Commission in this behalf, if its thinks fit, on the application of any person, not being a company desirous of obtaining any land for its purposes, direct that he may acquire such land under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (1 of 1894() in the same manner and on the same conditions as it might be acquired if the person were a company." | 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment