Internship Certificate

 

 

Ref.: AKS/IC/1707-1035/23                      Date : 2^nd day of June’ 2023

 

INTERNSHIP CERTIFICATE

 

This is to Certify that SHEWTALINA MAJUMDAR (C.U. Roll No. L08/LLB/181823), in Batch of 2018-2023 (5^th year), 10^th Semester, bonafied student of Jyotirmoy School of Law, Jyotirmoy Knowledge Park Kalikapur, Rajpur Sonarpur, PIN 743330, District South 24 Parganas, has successfully completed her internship under my guidance at High Court Calcutta and District Court from 8^th day of February, 2019 to 2^nd day of June’ 2023, 4 years 3 months 25 days. During this period she has done hard work with sincerely and dignity in the following Writ, Civil, Consumer, and Criminal Cases;

 

Sl. No.	Case Number	Cause Title	Court	Learning Criteria
1	EC/17/2023	Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited – Versus – Sunil Gupta and Another	High Court Calcutta	Arbitration Execution
2	WP no. 15254 of 2018	M/s. Nuddea Plantation Limited – Versus – Employee Provident Fund Organization and Others	High Court Calcutta	Demurrage of Employer  in EPF
3	CRR no. 689 of 2020	Dipankar Mondal – Versus – Ram Krishna Ashram and Others	High Court Calcutta	Criminal Revision
4	CO no. 3936 of 2022	Ramkrishna Nagar Boys Club – Versus – Ashok Kumar Mondal and Another	High Court Calcutta	Civil Revision
5	CO no. 3722 of 2022	Inder Chand Agarwal – Versus – Sarbati Devi Agarwala and Another	High Court Calcutta	Civil Revision
6	WPA/17283/2022	Dipak Kar – Versus – State of West Bengal and Others	High Court Calcutta	Land Acquisition
7	Title Suit no. 859 of 2022	Sushanta Banik – Versus – Tata Motors Finance Limited and Others	Civil Judge, Senior Division, 3rd Court, Alipore, South 24 Parganas	Suit for Declaration and Injunction
8	Title Suit no. 15 of 2017	Md. Azim and Others – Versus Apurba Naskar and Others	Civil Judge, Junior Division, 2nd Court, Baruipur, South 24 Parganas	Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction
9	Complaint Case no. 513 of 2019	Samir Manna – Versus – Pradip Kumar Mondal	Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 2nd Court, Baruipur, South 24 Parganas	Complaint Case under Section 200 Cr.P.C. for the offences committed to be punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act, 1881,
10	CC/281/2021	Tapash Ghosal – Versus – Soumen Chakraboty and others	District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Kolkata Unit – III (South) at Alipore Judges’ Court, Alipore, Kolkata - 700027	Consumer Complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019,

 

She tried to maintain explicit notes of the cases. She has acquired understanding to the followings;

 

(a)     The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996;

(b)    The Consumer Protection Act, 2019;

(c)     The Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881;

(d)    The Transfer of Property Act, 1882;

(e)     The Indian Contract Act, 1872;

(f)      The Constitution of India;

(g)    The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973;

(h)     The Civil Procedure Code, 1908;

(i)       The Evidence Act, 1872;

(j)       The Employee Provident Fund Act, 1952;

(k)     The Land Acquisition Act, 1894;

 

I have found her to be a self-starter, motivated, duty bound and hardworking. She performed excellent with her well behavior and was punctual to report in Chamber as well as at Court. She worked sincerely on her assignments and her performance was par excellence. She has talent and understanding to make successful career in the field of law.

 

I wish her all success in her life and future endeavors.

 

With regards’

 

 

ASHOK KUMAR SINGH

Advocate

High Court Calcutta