JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT
The Supreme Court has original,
appellate and advisory jurisdiction. Its exclusive original jurisdiction
extends to any dispute between the Government of India and one or more States
or between the Government of India and any State or States on one side and one
or more States on the other or between two or more States, if and insofar as
the dispute involves any question (whether of law or of fact) on which the
existence or extent of a legal right depends. In addition, Article 32 of the
Constitution gives an extensive original jurisdiction to the Supreme Court in
regard to enforcement of Fundamental Rights. It is empowered to issue
directions, orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus,
mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari to enforce them. The Supreme
Court has been conferred with power to direct transfer of any civil or criminal
case from one State High Court to another State High Court or from a Court
subordinate to another State High Court. The Supreme Court, if satisfied that
cases involving the same or substantially the same questions of law are pending
before it and one or more High Courts or before two or more High Courts and
that such questions are substantial questions of general importance, may
withdraw a case or cases pending before the High Court or High Courts and
dispose of all such cases itself. Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
1996, International Commercial Arbitration can also be initiated in the Supreme
Court.
The appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court can be invoked by a certificate
granted by the High Court concerned under Article 132(1), 133(1) or 134 of the
Constitution in respect of any judgement, decree or final order of a High Court
in both civil and criminal cases, involving substantial questions of law as to
the interpretation of the Constitution. Appeals also lie to the Supreme Court
in civil matters if the High Court concerned certifies : (a) that the case
involves a substantial question of law of general importance, and (b) that, in
the opinion of the High Court, the said question needs to be decided by the
Supreme Court. In criminal cases, an appeal lies to the Supreme Court if the
High Court (a) has on appeal reversed an order of acquittal of an accused
person and sentenced him to death or to imprisonment for life or for a period
of not less than 10 years, or (b) has withdrawn for trial before itself any
case from any Court subordinate to its authority and has in such trial
convicted the accused and sentenced him to death or to imprisonment for life or
for a period of not less than 10 years, or (c) certified that the case is a fit
one for appeal to the Supreme Court. Parliament is authorised to confer on the
Supreme Court any further powers to entertain and hear appeals from any
judgement, final order or sentence in a criminal proceeding of a High Court.
The Supreme Court has also a very
wide appellate jurisdiction over all Courts and Tribunals in India in as much
as it may, in its discretion, grant special leave to appeal under Article 136
of the Constitution from any judgment, decree, determination, sentence or order
in any cause or matter passed or made by any Court or Tribunal in the territory
of India.
The Supreme Court has special
advisory jurisdiction in matters which may specifically be referred to it by
the President of India under Article 143 of the Constitution. There are
provisions for reference or appeal to this Court under Article 317(1) of the
Constitution, Section 257 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 7(2) of the
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, Section 130-A of the
Customs Act, 1962, Section 35-H of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and
Section 82C of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968. Appeals also lie to the Supreme
Court under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, Monopolies and
Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, Advocates Act, 1961, Contempt of Courts
Act, 1971, Customs Act, 1962, Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, Enlargement
of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Act, 1970, Trial of Offences Relating to
Transactions in Securities Act, 1992, Terrorist and Disruptive Activities
(Prevention) Act, 1987 and Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Election Petitions
under Part III of the Presidential and Vice Presidential Elections Act, 1952
are also filed directly in the Supreme Court.
Under Articles 129 and 142 of the
Constitution the Supreme Court has been vested with power to punish for
contempt of Court including the power to punish for contempt of itself. In case
of contempt other than the contempt referred to in Rule 2, Part-I of the Rules
to Regulate Proceedings for Contempt of the Supreme Court, 1975, the Court may
take action (a) Suo motu, or (b) on a petition made by Attorney General, or
Solicitor General, or (c) on a petition made by any person, and in the case of
a criminal contempt with the consent in writing of the Attorney General or the
Solicitor General.
Under Order XL of the Supreme Court
Rules the Supreme Court may review its judgment or order but no application for
review is to be entertained in a civil proceeding except on the grounds
mentioned in Order XLVII, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure and in a
criminal proceeding except on the ground of an error apparent on the face of
the record.
PUBLIC INTEREST
LITIGATION
Although the proceedings in the Supreme Court arise out of the judgments or
orders made by the Subordinate Courts including the High Courts, but of late
the Supreme Court has started entertaining matters in which interest of the
public at large is involved and the Court can be moved by any individual or
group of persons either by filing a Writ Petition at the Filing Counter of the
Court or by addressing a letter to Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India
highlighting the question of public importance for invoking this jurisdiction.
Such concept is popularly known as 'Public Interest Litigation' and several
matters of public importance have become landmark cases. This concept is unique
to the Supreme Court of India only and perhaps no other Court in the world has
been exercising this extraordinary jurisdiction. A Writ Petition filed at the
Filing Counter is dealt with like any other Writ Petition and processed as
such. In case of a letter addressed to Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India
the same is dealt with in accordance with the guidelines framed for the
purpose.
PROVISION OF LEGAL AID
If a person belongs to the poor section of the society having annual income of
less than Rs. 18,000/- or belongs to Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe, a victim
of natural calamity, is a woman or a child or a mentally ill or otherwise
disabled person or an industrial workman, or is in custody including custody in
protective home, he/she is entitled to get free legal aid from the Supreme
Court Legal Aid Committee. The aid so granted by the Committee includes cost of
preparation of the matter and all applications connected therewith, in addition
to providing an Advocate for preparing and arguing the case. Any person
desirous of availing legal service through the Committee has to make an
application to the Secretary and hand over all necessary documents concerning
his case to it. The Committee after ascertaining the eligibility of the person
provides necessary legal aid to him/her.
Persons belonging to middle income
group i.e. with income above Rs. 18,000/- but under Rs. 1,20,000/- per annum
are eligible to get legal aid from the Supreme Court Middle Income Group
Society, on nominal payments.
AMICUS CURIAE
If a petition is received from the
jail or in any other criminal matter if the accused is unrepresented then an
Advocate is appointed as amicus curiae by the Court to defend and argue the
case of the accused. In civil matters also the Court can appoint an Advocate as
amicus curiae if it thinks it necessary in case of an unrepresented party; the
Court can also appoint amicus curiae in any matter of general public importance
or in which the interest of the public at large is involved.
HIGH COURTS
The High Court stands at the head of a State's judicial administration. There
are 18 High Courts in the country, three having jurisdiction over more than one
State. Among the Union Territories Delhi alone has a High Court of its own.
Other six Union Territories come under the jurisdiction of different State High
Courts. Each High Court comprises of a Chief Justice and such other Judges as
the President may, from time to time, appoint. The Chief Justice of a High
Court is appointed by the President in consultation with the Chief Justice of
India and the Governor of the State. The procedure for appointing puisne Judges
is the same except that the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned is also
consulted. They hold office until the age of 62 years and are removable in the
same manner as a Judge of the Supreme Court. To be eligible for appointment as
a Judge one must be a citizen of India and have held a judicial office in India
for ten years or must have practised as an Adovcate of a High Court or two or
more such Courts in succession for a similar period.
Each High Court has power to issue
to any person within its jurisdiction directions, orders, or writs including
writs which are in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo
warranto and certiorari for enforcement of Fundamental Rights and for any other
purpose. This power may also be exercised by any High Court exercising
jurisdiction in relation to territories within which the cause of action,
wholly or in part, arises for exercise of such power, notwithstanding that the
seat of such Government or authority or residence of such person is not within
those territories.
Each High Court has powers of
superintendence over all Courts within its jurisdiction. It can call for
returns from such Courts, make and issue general rules and prescribe forms to
regulate their practice and proceedings and determine the manner and form in
which book entries and accounts shall be kept. The following Table (*Ann.A)
gives the seat and territorial jurisdiction of the High Courts.
ADVOCATE GENERAL
There is an Advocate General for each State, appointed by the Governor, who
holds office during the pleasure of the Governor. He must be a person qualified
to be appointed as a Judge of High Court. His duty is to give advice to State
Governments upon such legal matters and to perform such other duties of legal
character, as may be referred or assigned to him by the Governor. The Advocate
General has the right to speak and take part in the proceedings of the State
Legislature without the right to vote.
LOK ADALATS
Lok Adalats which are voluntary agencies are monitored by the State Legal Aid
and Advice Boards. They have proved to be a successful alternative forum for
resolving of disputes through the conciliatory method.
The Legal Services Authorities Act,
1987 provides statutory status to the legal aid movement and it also provides
for setting up of Legal Services Authorities at the Central, State and District
levels. These authorities will have their own funds. Further, Lok Adalats which
are at present informal agencies will acquire statutory status. Every award of
Lok Adalats shall be deemed to be a decree of a civil court or order of a
Tribunal and shall be final and binding on the parties to the dispute. It also
provides that in respect of cases decided at a Lok Adalat, the court fee paid
by the parties will be refunded.
Annexure 'A'
JURISDICTION AND SEAT
OF HIGH COURTS
Name |
Year |
Territorial
establishment jurisdiction |
Seat |
Allahabad
|
1866 |
Uttar
Pradesh |
Allahabad
(Bench at Lucknow) |
Andhra
Pradesh |
1956 |
Andhra
Pradesh |
Hyderabad |
Bombay
|
1862 |
Maharashtra,
Goa, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu |
Bombay
(Benches at Nagpur, Panaji and Aurangabad) |
Calcutta
|
1862 |
West
Bengal |
Calcutta
(Circuit Bench at Port Blair) |
Delhi |
1966 |
Delhi |
Delhi |
Guwahati(2) |
1948 |
Assam,
Manipur, Meghalaya, Nagaland,Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh |
Guwahati
(Benches at Kohima, Aizwal & Imphal. Circuit Bench at Agartala &
Shillong) |
Gujarat
|
1960 |
Gujarat |
Ahmedabad |
Himachal
Pradesh |
1971 |
Himachal
Pradesh |
Shimla |
Jammu
& Kashmir |
1928 |
Jammu
& Kashmir |
Srinagar
& Jammu |
Karnataka(3) |
1884 |
Karnataka |
Bangalore |
Kerala |
1958 |
Kerala
& Lakshadweep |
Ernakulam |
Madhya
Pradesh |
1956 |
Madhya
Pradesh |
Jabalpur
(Benches at Gwalior and Indore) |
Madras
|
1862 |
Tamil
Nadu & Pondicherry |
Madras |
Orissa |
1948 |
Orissa |
Cuttack |
Patna
|
1916 |
Bihar |
Patna
(Bench at Ranchi) |
Punjab
& Haryana(4) |
1975 |
Punjab, Haryana & Chandigarh |
Chandigarh |
Rajasthan
|
1949 |
Rajasthan |
Jodhpur
(Bench at Jaipur) |
Sikkim |
1975 |
Sikkim |
Gangtok |
No comments:
Post a Comment