In law,
sub judice, Latin for "under judgment," means that a particular
case or matter is currently under trial
or being considered by a judge or court. The term may be used synonymously
with "the present case" or "the case at bar" by some lawyers.
In England and Wales, Ireland,
New Zealand,
Australia,
India,
Pakistan,
Canada,
and Israel
it is generally considered inappropriate to comment publicly on cases sub
judice, which can be an offence in itself, leading to contempt of
court proceedings. This is particularly true in criminal
cases, where publicly discussing cases sub judice may constitute
interference with due process.
In English law, the term was correctly used to describe material which would
prejudice court proceedings by publication before 1981. Sub judice is
now irrelevant to journalists because of the introduction of the Contempt of
Court Act 1981. Under Section 2 of the Act, a substantial risk of serious
prejudice can only be created by a media report when proceedings are active.
Proceedings become active when there's an arrest, oral charge, issue of a
warrant, or a summons.
In the United States, there are First
Amendment concerns about stifling the right of free speech which
prevent such tight restrictions on comments sub judice. However, State
Rules of Professional Conduct governing attorneys often place restrictions on
the out-of-court statements an attorney may make regarding an ongoing case.
Furthermore, there are still protections for criminal defendants, and those
convicted in an atmosphere of a circus
have had their convictions overturned for a fairer trial.
No comments:
Post a Comment