Chapter xvi sec-299 to 304 of IPC DEALS WITH CULPABLE
HOMICIDE AND MURDER
Culpable homicide
Meaning;-
Homicide =
homo + cido (Latin words)
·
Homo
means human
·
Cido
means killing
So Homicide means
the killing of a human being by a human being.
Homicide may be
either lawful or unlawful.
(a) Lawful Homicide : In case of lawful homicide, law will set the
culprit free.
(b) Unlawful Homicide :
If death is
caused with intention or knowledge to cause death, then homicide is classified
as unlawful homicide. These cases are Culpable homicide Under Section 299 of
the Indian Penal Code and Murder under Section 300 of I.P.C.
Culpable means
criminal manner or punishable by
law.
So Culpable
homicide means death through human agency punishable by law.
Section 299 and
Section 300 Indian Penal Code, 1860, deals with the definition of culpable
homicide and murder respectively
SEC -299 DEFIEN
CULPABLE HOMICIDE IN SIMPLE WAY culpable homicide are two kinds
1. Culpable Homicide
Amounting to Murder: It is known as simple murder
2. Culpable homicide not
amounting to Murder:
There is necessarily a criminal or knowledge in both. The difference
does not lie in quality, it lies in the quantity or degree of criminality
closed by the act
Culpable homicide is genus and murder the specis
Culpable
homicide is the Genus, and murder is the Species. All murder are culpable
homicide but not vice-versa, it has be held in Nara singh Challan v/s Sate of Orrisa (1997c. Culpable homicide genus. Sec -300 defiens
murder. And also say circumstance when culpable homicide turn in to murder.
which which means murder is the species of
culpable homicide. It is noted here noted that the the culpable homicide not
amounting to murder is not defiend separetly in ipc. It is defiend a part of
murder in IPC
CULPABLE HOMICIDE ON THE BASIS OF DEFINATIONS
COMMON
ELEMENT :-when an Act/omission (actusreous ) resulting the death of another human being it would be
culpable homicide if any of the mensrea are their
Culpable
Homicide (sec-299) |
When
Culpable Homicide is murder (sec-300) |
When
culpable homicide is not murder (5-exception
of sec-300) |
1. Intention to
cause death |
a. Intention to
cause death (no
extra element necessary) |
·
Provocation ·
Right of private defence ·
public servant exceeding his power ·
sudden fight ·
with consent |
2. Intention of
such bodily injury as is likely to cause death. |
·
+ knowledge of the offender ·
+sufficient in ordinary course of nature |
|
3.
With knowledge of possibility of death |
+
surety of knowledge of death |
|
CULPABLE
HOMICIDE
ESSENTIAL
INGRIEDIENTS OF SEC-299
a) Cause
of a death of a human being
b) Such
death must have been caused by doing an act
I. With
an intention to causing death
II. With
an intention to causing such bodily injury as is likely to cause death.
III. With
knowledge that the doer is likely by such act to cause death.
As per the sec.300 of IPC except the exceptions culpable homicide
is murder, it the act by which death is caused:
1.
with the intention of causing death or
2. It an
intention of causing such bodily injury as
the offender knows to be likely to cause the death or
3. with the intention of causing such bodily
injury as is sufficient ordinary cause of nature to cause death
4.with
knowledge that the act is so imminently dangerous that it must in all
probability, cause death
Whenever the court has find out wheather an offence is culpable homicide
not amounting to murder or murder it should be followed three steps
First- a causal conection has to be
established between the act of the accused and death caused
Onces that is proved
The next step is finding out wheather the act
of the accused is culpable homicide as defined u/s 299 ipc .
If answer is affirmative
Then the court has to be find wheather the
case come within the ambit any of the four clauses of sec-300 .
If the answer is negative the offence is
culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
But if the answer is positive then it is
murder
And also if the answer is positive but fall
within any of the exception u/s-300 then also it will culpable homicide not
amounting to murder.
Illustrations
· A shoots Z with intention of killing him, Z dies in
consequence, A commits murder.
·
A knowing that
Z is labouring under such disease that a blow is likely to cause his death,
strike him with the intention of causing bodily injury, Z dies in consequences
of blow. A is guilty of murder.
·
A’ knows that
Z is behind a bush, B does not know it. A intending to cause or
knowing that is likely to cause Z’s death induces B to fire at the bush.
B fires and kills Z. Here B may be guilty of no offence, but A has
committed the offence of culpable homicide.
Leading
case laws
Reg. V/s. Govinda 1876 (Bom): In this case the accused kicked his wife who
was 15 years old and gave her a few blow on the body with the result she fell
down on the ground. Then he put one knee on her chest and struck her a few more
blow resulting in her death. The lower court convicted him of murder. There
were different opinions amongst the two judges of the High Court and
consequently the matter was referred to a third Judge, Justice Melvil, who held
the accused guilty under clause (2) of sec.299 for culpable homicide and
sentenced him u/s 304 part I on the grounds that the death was caused with the
intention on the part of the accused to cause such bodily injury as was likely
to cause death
No comments:
Post a Comment