Thursday, May 4, 2023

SUMMARY SUIT

 

SUMMARY SUIT

 

     IN THE SMALL CAUSES COURT AT BARODA

SUMMARY SUIT NO          OF 2017

(Under Order XXXVII of the Code Civil Procedure, 1908)

 

PLAINTIFF … M/S.SURAT AMMONIA & CHEMICAL  COMPANY

A Regd. Partnership firm Under the Indian  Companies Act. -   Business, and having its Head Office at :- 106/B, Regent Tower, Opp. Income Tax Office, Race Course Circle, Baroda – 390007. And having its Plant & Factory Situated at :- Plot NO.2018, Phase – III, GIDC Estate, Vatva,

Through its Authorize Person Mr. Kirtankumar G. Panchal Aged       Years,  Religion Hindu, Doing Service At 504,Attantis Heights,5th Floor,Sarabhai campus, Near Genda Circle, Wadi Wadi Vadodara 390023.

 

VERSUS

 

DEFENDANT:  M/S. VAISHNAVI BIO TECH LIMITED  

AT :-  Survey No.27, Veedia Village, Gahdnghli Road, SIHOR, TA. & DIST :- BHAVNAGAR.

 

Suit Valued at Rs.2,70,282.00

The plaintiff above named respectfully begs to submit before the Hon’ble Court ad under:-

 

1..    That the plaintiff is a Registered Partnership frim, under the The Indian Partnership Act. And having its shop/office at the address mentioned in the cause title of the suit. The plaintiff is inter-alia engaged in the business of Manufacturing and selling certain Anhydrous Ammonia Gas, Liquor Ammonia  and other chemicals goods on wholesale sale and semi wholesale basis and the Present Suit filed by the Authorize Person  of the Plaintiff Firm.

 

 (2)   The plaintiff humbly submits that the Defendant is carrying out its business in name and style of M/S. VAISHNAVI BIO TECH LIMITED , At the address which is mentioned in the cause title. The plaintiff craves the leave of the Hon’ble Court to amend the constitution of the defendant accordingly if the need be in future.

 

(3)    The plaintiff submits that the Defendant approached the plaintiff in the year 2015-2016  and requested to supply LIQUOR AMMONIA,  goods as per the credit facilities, and other related terms and con ditions agreed between the plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff opened an account in its books of account for defendant at BARODA Office and defendant have issued a Purchase Order, and as per purchase order Plaintiff  started to effect supply of goods to the defendant as per the order and specifications given by the Defendant. The plaintiff was raising the Bills/Invoice for the goods supplied to defendant and the defendant had received the goods without any defect and had acknowledge the same without any complaint.

 

(4)    The plaintiff submits that the plaintiff is a Partnership firm and maintains and keeps books of account of the all transactions of all the parties including the present defendant . The Plaintiff states that it supplied to the Defendant the goods on credit basis and the defendant in due course of time was making payments as per its convenience but was not that particular and regular in making the payments Accordingly running account was being maintained by and between the parties. The Defendant has never raised any disputes regarding quality of the goods supplied to it.

 

(5)    The Plaintiff states that the business relation with the defendant started in the year 2015. And Defendant has purchased good worth Rs.6,54,235/- from 26/10/2015 to 2/2/2016. The Plaintiff submits that the defendant has failed to make full payment towards its following Bill(s)/Invoice(s) and a full bill amount still remains as outstanding dues in the Books of Accounts maintained by the Plaintiff.

Bill/Invoice No.

Date

Bill/Invoice Amount [Rs.]

2163

 18/12/2015

1,47,609.00

2466

02/02/2016

      1,39,293.00

 

Total

      2,86,902.00

 

(6)    The plaintiff submits that as per the book of account maintained by the plaintiff, the Defendant had purchased Chemical goods worth Rs.6,54,235/- Thereafter the Plaintiff has contacted the defendant several times telephonically/personally to pay the outstanding dues, and defendant had paid only a part payment of Rs.4,22,661/- (i.e. Rs.1,22,661/- on Dt.1/12/2015, Rs.2,00,000/- on 29/1/2016, & Lastly Rs.1,00,000’- on 5/4/2016) which is credited in defendant’s account by the plaintiff and after crediting the same Rs.2,31,574-00 still outstanding dues in defendant’s account. Therefore, defendant is liable to pay 15 % Interest on due amount from 2/2/2016 to 31/03/2017.

 

Plaintiff states that thereafter number of reminder send to the defendant for clear the outstanding dues but defendant failed to make the payment and finally the Plaintiff called upon the defendant to clear the outstanding by issuing legal notice dated.11/2/2017 by RPAD. which was duly served to the Defendant. but defendant failed to make compliance with the same. The Plaintiff states that till date the defendant has neither made the outstanding payment of Rs.2,31,574.00 being the Principal amount nor has given any reply to the notice issued by the Plaintiff. It is further submitted that the plaintiff is entitled to charge the interest at the rate of 15 % per annum as agreed and understood by the defendant and as per the terms and condition of the bill/Invoices  raised to the defendant.

 

(7)    The plaintiff is entitled to demand payment of the aforesaid amount as the defendant has failed and neglected to make the payment of the said amount due and/or any part thereof in response to the aforesaid reminders and notice. Under the above circumstances the Plaintiff is constrained to file this suit to recover the dues with interest @ of 15 % and cost.

 

(8)    The Plaintiff is a proprietary firm and regularly maintains its Books of Account and as per the same Rs.6,54,235.00 being the principal amount and interest Rs.36,708.00  Interest accrued @ of 15 % p. a & Notice Charges Rs.2,000.00, aggregating to Rs.6,92,943.00 are due and payable by the defendant as on 31/03/2017 more particularly calculated hereunder:-

 

Description

Amount [Rs.]

A.

Principal  Amount of  as per Statement of Accounts.

  6,54,235.00

B.

Interest –    @ 15 % p.a.

  0,36,708.00

C.

Notice charges 

  0,02,000.00

 

Total amount due with interest, Notice charges [A+B+C]

6,92,943.00

 

LESS

 

A.

Payment paid by defendant,  from 26/10/2015 to 31/03/2017 as per statement of account

4,22,661.00

 

TOTAL OUTSTANDING DUES

   2,70,282.00

 

 (RUPEES TWO LACS SEVENTY THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY TWO ONLY)

It is submitted that the defendant has will fully defaulted and have no intention to repay the debt due to the Plaintiff. Therefore, plaintiff is constrained to file the present suit for recovery of Rs.2,70,282.00 being the debt due as on 31-03-2017 against the defendant before this Hon’ble Court.

 

(9)    The plaintiff submits that the  Registered office & factory of the plaintiff is situated at BARODA and carrying on its business at BARODA. The aforesaid transaction were arised out between the plaintiff and defendant at BARODA, the goods was  supplied to  defendant from Plaintiff’s factory and accounts are maintained at BARODA. and there is a condition in the invoice/Bill i.e. “Subject to BARODA Jurisdiction” and thereby the defendant was submitted to the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. As per the terms and conditions agreed between the parties, the payment was to be made in BARODA to the plaintiff. Thus, the whole transaction were arised and materialised at BARODA and the defendant has submitted to the jurisdiction of this court and therefore the cause of action has arisen at BARODA and therefore this Hon’ble Court has jurisdiction to entertain, try and dispose of the suit.

 

(10)   The Plaintiff states that the cause of action for filling the present suit has arisen as on date when the defendant failed to make the payment of the outstanding dues towards the cloth goods supplied by the Plaintiff by number of invoice and defendant failed to pay the payment of invoice Dt.18/12/2016, & 2/2/2016  as per the statement of accounts, Part payment was made from 1/12/2015 to 5/4/2016 ,  and when the demand notice issued dated 11/2/2017 raising the outstanding dues with interest to the defendant and the said notice duly served to the defendant, and defendant failed to make  payments in compliance with the same, and as such cause of action is still continuing.

(11)   The Plaintiff states that the suit is filed within the prescribed period of limitation.

 

(12)   In view of the facts and circumstances narrated above, the Plaintiff prays to this Hon’ble Court as under:-

A.     The Hon’ble court may by pleased to allow the suit and pass decree against the defendant for the sum of Rs.2,70,282.00  (RUPEES TWO LAC SEVENTY THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY TWO ONLY) together with interest pendente-lite at the rate of 15 % per annum from the date of filling of this suit till realization in favour of the Plaintiff and against the defendant along with all costs, charges and other expenses that may be incurred from the date of filing of this suit till payment and/or realization by the plaintiff.

B.     Any other and further relief’s be granted in favour of the plaintiff against the defendant.

 

(13)   For the purpose of Court Fee. Advocate Fees and jurisdiction the plaintiff values its claim in the suit at Rs.2,70,282/-  and has paid court fees of Rs.9,550.00 thereon.

 

(14)   The present suit filed under order 37 Civil Procedure Code and the relief is claimed accordingly. No relief that falls outside the ambit of the order has been claimed in the plaint.

 

(15)   Copy of Plaint, duplicate copy of plaint, Affidavit, Vakalatnama, list, Address Pursis & Application of Summons Served to the Defendant by R.P.A.D Post and Through Court Bailief by taking Emergent Process Fess and copy of the plaint for defendant are filed herewith.

 

(16)   The address of the plaintiff as stated in the title of the plaint is true and correct as per the order 6 rule 14 (A) of the Civil Procedure Code.

BARODA

Date:    /03/2017                                 

 

 

       

                                                                       

Verification

 

I, Kirtankumar G. Panchal Authorize Person  of the plaintiff firm, do hereby state and verify that whatever stated in the Plaint is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief which I believe to be true and correct.

BARODA

Date:    /06/2017                         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

V A K I L A T N A M A

 

IN THE SMALL CAUSES COURT AT BARODA

                 SUMMARY SUIT NO.         OF 2017

PLAINTIFF:        

VERSUS

DEFENDANT:       M/S. VAISHNAVI BIO TECH LIMITED

 

I/We, Plaintiff,  the undersigned  do  hereby  appoint  and  authorize Shri                                        ,ADVOCATE. BARODA to act, appear and plead for me/us in the above matter and on my/ our behalf to conduct all proceedings connected with the same including proceedings in suits, appeal, and revision to file and obtain return of documents and application fro review, and to present me/us and to take all necessary steps on my/our behalf in the above matter. The said advocate when he/is unable to remain present and for any reason will be entitled to give proxy to any Advocate of his choice. I/We agree to ratify all acts done by the aforesaid advocate in pursuance of this authority.

 

Date:    /06/2017                                 

                               

                                                       

I ACCEPT.

 

 

 

 

 

SUHAG D. JADAV         

       ADVOCATE.

SHED NO.3, CITY

CIVIL COURT,       

INCOME TAX, BARODA

M.NO.9824029242

 

IN THE SMALL CAUSES COURT AT BARODA

                  SUMMARY SUIT NO.       OF 2017

 

PLAINTIFF:         M/S.SURAT AMMONIA & CHEMICAL  COMPANY

 

VERSUS

 

DEFENDANT:       M/S. VAISHNAVI BIO TECH LIMITED

 

LIST OF DOCUEMNTS

The Plaintiff produces documents by way of List

 

Sl No.        Description                                                 Date

01     Office Copy of Partnership firm agreement               19/01/2015

 

02     Office Copy of Bill        No.955                              19/03/2015

 

03     Office Copy of Notice                                   24/12/2016

 

04     Copy of Original cover

 

05      Statement of Accounts

 

06     Copy of Power Of Attorney

 

 

 

v

 

 

Date :     /03/2017     

Plate : BARODA                                           Advocate for Plaintiff


IN THE SMALL CAUSES COURT AT BARODA

 

                  SUMMARY SUIT NO.          OF 2017

 

PLAINTIFF:         M/S.SURAT AMMONIA & CHEMICAL  COMPANY

 

VERSUS

 

DEFENDANT:       M/S. RATNADEEP METAL & TUBES LIMITED

PLAAINTIFF’S ADDRESS PURSIS

 

The address of the plaintiff as stated in the title of the plaint is true and correct as per the order 6 rule 14 (A) of the Civil Procedure Code.

 

 

Place :  BARODA

Date  :      -06 -2017                    Advocate for Plaintiff.

                                                     Suhag D. Jadav

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IN THE SMALL CAUSES COURT AT BARODA

                  SUMMARY SUIT NO.       OF 2017

  PLAINTIFF:        M/S.SURAT AMMONIA & CHEMICAL  COMPANY

VERSUS

DEFENDANT:        M/S. VAISHNAVI BIO TECH LIMITED

 

SUBJECT : PERMISSION APPLICATION.

 

I, the Plaintiff do solemnly state as under  through this application that :

 

1..    The Names and Address mentioned in the cause of title of the suit is true and fair.

 

2..    The defendant/s are outside the limits of BARODA City, However, the transaction has been taken place within the city of BARODA. As per the terms and conditions agreed between the parties, the payment was to be made in BARODA to the plaintiff. Therefore, this Hon’ble Court has jurisdiction to try the suit.

 

3..    The said financial transaction was taken place in the BARODA city. They are residing outside of BARODA city. Therefore, this application is filed for the filing of suit before your honour.

 

4..    It is therefore prayed that …

 

(A)      In considering the said transaction, the Hon’ble court may permit us to file suit.

 

5..    The required affidavit is enclosed here.

 

6..    The necessary court fees stamp is affixed on this application.

 

BARODA.

 

DT.      /06 /2017.                                       ------------------------

                                                                                PLAINTIFF.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IN THE SMALL CAUSES COURT AT BARODA

                  SUMMARY SUIT NO.       OF 2017

  PLAINTIFF:        M/S.SURAT AMMONIA & CHEMICAL  COMPANY

VERSUS

DEFENDANT:        M/S. VAISHNAVI BIO TECH LIMITED

        I, Mr. Kirtankumar G. Panchal Aged       Years,  Religion Hindu, Doing Service At 504,Attantis Heights,5th Floor,Sarabhai campus, Near Genda Circle, Wadi Wadi Vadodara 390023. do hereby take an oath and state on solemn affirmation as under …

 

1..    The Names and Address mentioned in the cause of title of the suit is true and fair.

 

2..    The defendant/s are outside the limits of BARODA City, However, the transaction has been taken place within the city of BARODA. As per the terms and conditions agreed between the parties, the payment was to be made in BARODA to the plaintiff. Therefore, this Hon’ble Court has jurisdiction to try the suit.

 

3..    The said financial transaction was taken place in the BARODA city. They are residing outside of BARODA city. Therefore, this application is filed for the filing of suit before your honour.

 

        What is stated herein above is true to the best of my own knowledge.

 

BARODA.

 

DT.      /06 /2017.                                       ------------------------

                                                                   PLAINTIFF.

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IN THE SMALL CAUSES  COURT AT BARODA.

 

S.S.NO.             OF 2017

 

PLAINTIFF:-       M/S. SAHEJA SUITS

 

VERSUS

DEFENDANT:M/S. VAISHNAVI BIO TECH LIMITED

SUIT VALUED AT RS.3,44,120.00

                                        STAMP RS.4900.00

 

SUB : PLAINTIFF’S SUMMARY SUIT UNDER ORDER-37 OF C.P.C.-1908.

 

 : Duplicate Copy, Plaint, V.P., List, Pursis, Application.

               

 Filed On  :      /06/2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ADVOCATE FOR PLAINTIFF

SUHAG D. JADAV

                      ADVOCATE,

SHED NO.1,CITY CIVIL COURT, INCOME TAX, BARODA

M.NO.9824029242

                                         SANAD NO.G/1428/2003.

 

PLAINTIFF’S ADVOCATE MR. SUHAG D.JADAV

 

     IN THE SMALL CAUSES COURT AT BARODA

SUMMARY SUIT NO          OF 2017

 (Under Order XXXVII of the Code Civil Procedure, 1908)

 

PLAINTIFF … M/S.SURAT AMMONIA & CHEMICAL  COMPANY

A Regd. Partnership firm Under the Indian  Companies Act. -   Business, and having its Head Office at :- 106/B, Regent Tower, Opp. Income Tax Office, Race Course Circle, Baroda – 390007. And having its Plant & Factory Situated at :- Plot NO.2018, Phase – III, GIDC Estate, Vatva,

Through its Authority Person Mr. Kirtankumar G. Panchal Aged       Years,  Religion Hindu, Doing Service At 504,Attantis Heights,5th Floor,Sarabhai campus, Near Genda Circle, Wadi Wadi Vadodara 390023.

 

VERSUS

 

DEFENDANT:  M/S. VAISHNAVI BIO TECH LIMITED 

AT :-  Survey No.27, Veedia Village, Gahdnghli Road, SIHOR, TA. & DIST :- BHAVNAGAR.

 

AFFIDAVIT

 

I, Mr. Kirtankumar G. Panchal Aged       Years,  Religion Hindu, Doing Service At 504,Attantis Heights,5th Floor,Sarabhai campus, Near Genda Circle, Wadi Wadi Vadodara 390023. do hereby take an oath and state on solemn affirmation as under …

 

1..    That the plaintiff is a Registered Partnership frim, under the The Indian Partnership Act. And having its shop/office at the address mentioned in the cause title of the suit. The plaintiff is inter-alia engaged in the business of Manufacturing and selling certain Anhydrous Ammonia Gas, Liquor Ammonia  and other chemicals goods on wholesale sale and semi wholesale basis and the Present Suit filed by the Authority Person  of the Plaintiff Firm.

 

 (2)   The plaintiff humbly submits that the Defendant is carrying out its business in name and style of M/S. VAISHNAVI BIO TECH LIMITED , At the address which is mentioned in the cause title. The plaintiff craves the leave of the Hon’ble Court to amend the constitution of the defendant accordingly if the need be in future.

 

(3)    The plaintiff submits that the Defendant approached the plaintiff in the year 2015-2016  and requested to supply LIQUOR AMMONIA,  goods as per the credit facilities, and other related terms and conditions agreed between the plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff opened an account in its books of account for defendant at BARODA Office and defendant have issued a Purchase Order, and as per purchase order Plaintiff  started to effect supply of goods to the defendant as per the order and specifications given by the Defendant. The plaintiff was raising the Bills/Invoice for the goods supplied to defendant and the defendant had received the goods without any defect and had acknowledge the same without any complaint.

 

(4)    The plaintiff submits that the plaintiff is a Partnership firm and maintains and keeps books of account of the all transactions of all the parties including the present defendant . The Plaintiff states that it supplied to the Defendant the goods on credit basis and the defendant in due course of time was making payments as per its convenience but was not that particular and regular in making the payments Accordingly running account was being maintained by and between the parties. The Defendant has never raised any disputes regarding quality of the goods supplied to it.

 

(5)    The Plaintiff states that the business relation with the defendant started in the year 2015. And Defendant has purchased good worth Rs.6,54,235/- from 26/10/2015 to 2/2/2016. The Plaintiff submits that the defendant has failed to make full payment towards its following Bill(s)/Invoice(s) and a full bill amount still remains as outstanding dues in the Books of Accounts maintained by the Plaintiff.

Bill/Invoice No.

Date

Bill/Invoice Amount [Rs.]

2163

 18/12/2015

1,47,609.00

2466

02/02/2016

      1,39,293.00

 

Total

      2,86,902.00

 

(6)    The plaintiff submits that as per the book of account maintained by the plaintiff, the Defendant had purchased Chemical goods worth Rs.6,54,235/- Thereafter the Plaintiff has contacted the defendant several times telephonically/personally to pay the outstanding dues, and defendant had paid only a part payment of Rs.4,22,661/- (i.e. Rs.1,22,661/- on Dt.1/12/2015, Rs.2,00,000/- on 29/1/2016, & Lastly Rs.1,00,000’- on 5/4/2016) which is credited in defendant’s account by the plaintiff and after crediting the same Rs.2,31,574-00 still outstanding dues in defendant’s account. Therefore, defendant is liable to pay 15 % Interest on due amount from 2/2/2016 to 31/03/2017.

 

Plaintiff states that thereafter number of reminder send to the defendant for clear the outstanding dues but defendant failed to make the payment and finally the Plaintiff called upon the defendant to clear the outstanding by issuing legal notice dated.11/2/2017 by RPAD. which was duly served to the Defendant. but defendant failed to make compliance with the same. The Plaintiff states that till date the defendant has neither made the outstanding payment of Rs.2,31,574.00 being the Principal amount nor has given any reply to the notice issued by the Plaintiff. It is further submitted that the plaintiff is entitled to charge the interest at the rate of 15 % per annum as agreed and understood by the defendant and as per the terms and condition of the bill/Invoices  raised to the defendant.

 

(7)    The plaintiff is entitled to demand payment of the aforesaid amount as the defendant has failed and neglected to make the payment of the said amount due and/or any part thereof in response to the aforesaid reminders and notice. Under the above circumstances the Plaintiff is constrained to file this suit to recover the dues with interest @ of 15 % and cost.

 

(8)    The Plaintiff is a proprietary firm and regularly maintains its Books of Account and as per the same Rs.6,54,235.00 being the principal amount and interest Rs.36,708.00  Interest accrued @ of 15 % p. a & Notice Charges Rs.2,000.00, aggregating to Rs.6,92,943.00 are due and payable by the defendant as on 31/03/2017 more particularly calculated hereunder:-

 

Description

Amount [Rs.]

A.

Principal  Amount of  as per Statement of Accounts.

  6,54,235.00

B.

Interest –    @ 15 % p.a.

  0,36,708.00

C.

Notice charges 

  0,02,000.00

 

Total amount due with interest, Notice charges [A+B+C]

6,92,943.00

 

LESS

 

A.

Payment paid by defendant,  from 26/10/2015 to 31/03/2017 as per statement of account

4,22,661.00

 

TOTAL OUTSTANDING DUES

   2,70,282.00

 

 (RUPEES TWO LACS SEVENTY THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY TWO ONLY)

It is submitted that the defendant has will fully defaulted and have no intention to repay the debt due to the Plaintiff. Therefore, plaintiff is constrained to file the present suit for recovery of Rs.2,70,282.00 being the debt due as on 31-03-2017 against the defendant before this Hon’ble Court.

 

(9)    The plaintiff submits that the  Registered office & factory of the plaintiff is situated at BARODA and carrying on its business at BARODA. The aforesaid transaction were arised out between the plaintiff and defendant at BARODA, the goods was  supplied to  defendant from Plaintiff’s factory and accounts are maintained at BARODA. and there is a condition in the invoice/Bill i.e. “Subject to BARODA Jurisdiction” and thereby the defendant was submitted to the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. As per the terms and conditions agreed between the parties, the payment was to be made in BARODA to the plaintiff. Thus, the whole transaction were arised and materialised at BARODA and the defendant has submitted to the jurisdiction of this court and therefore the cause of action has arisen at BARODA and therefore this Hon’ble Court has jurisdiction to entertain, try and dispose of the suit.

 

(10)   The Plaintiff states that the cause of action for filling the present suit has arisen as on date when the defendant failed to make the payment of the outstanding dues towards the cloth goods supplied by the Plaintiff by number of invoice and defendant failed to pay the payment of invoice Dt.18/12/2016, & 2/2/2016  as per the statement of accounts, Part payment was made from 1/12/2015 to 5/4/2016 ,  and when the demand notice issued dated 11/2/2017 raising the outstanding dues with interest to the defendant and the said notice duly served to the defendant, and defendant failed to make  payments in compliance with the same, and as such cause of action is still continuing.

(11)   The Plaintiff states that the suit is filed within the prescribed period of limitation.

 

What is stated herein above is true to the best of my own knowledge.

 

BARODA

   /06/2017

 

 

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment