Wednesday, October 16, 2024

Evidence on Affidavit in Consumer Case

 

District : Kolkata.

Before the Hon’ble District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata, Unit – I.

                                                         

                                                     Complaint Case no. C.C. no. 476 of 2013.

 

                                                                   In the matter of :

Miss Priyanka  Halder,

          ________Complainant / Applicant / Petitioner.

 

-          Versus –

 

M/s. Nokia India Private Limited, and others.

________Respondents / Opposite Parties.

 

EVIDENCE ON AFFIDAVIT

AFFIDAVIT

 

Affidavit of Shri Supratik De, Son of B.K. De, aged about __________years, by faith Hindu, by Occupation Advocate, practicing at Alipore Criminal Court, 6, Baker Road, Alipore, Kolkata – 700 027,  District – South 24 Parganas.

 

I, the above deponent do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under :-

 

1.   That I am thoroughly conversant with the facts and circumstances of the present case and am competent to swear this affidavit.

 

2.   That I say that Miss Priyanka Halder, Daughter of Shri Debasish Halder, aged about 28 years, by faith Hindu, by Occupation Advocate, residing at premises being no. 1/1, Sankar Bose Road, Kolkata – 700 027, Police Station - Chetla,  District – South 24 Parganas, is my junior and practicing under me since December’ 2012.

 

3.   That I say that as I know that though Mobile has been repaired and corrected by the Service Center M/s. A N MOBILE TELECOM PVT. LIMITED, having it’s office at premises being no. 173, S.P. Mukherjee Road, Mudiali, Police Station – Tollygunge, Kolkata – 700 026, District – South 24-Parganas, the mobile handset ( i.e. NOKIA 311 ASHA ), did not work properly and the different problems has been observed by my junior at the time of use of such mobile handset, and thus She visited the said Service Center on several occasions as enumerated below herein :

 

a)    Job Sheet No. 293504886 / 130302 / 19, dated 2nd day of March’ 2013.

b)   Job Sheet No. 293504886 / 130418 / 35, dated 18th day of April’ 2013.

c)    Job Sheet No. 293504886 / 130523 / 47, dated 23rd day of May’ 2013.

 

4.   That I say that due to such harassments, She wrote a letter dated 3rd day of May’ 2013, to the Respondent / Opposite Party no.1,  M/s. Nokia India Private Limited, having it’s Office at Flat no. 1204, 12th Floor, Kailash Kasturba, Gandhi Marg, New Delhi – 110 001, stating inter alia the facts of her sufferings, requesting therein to replace the said defective Mobile Handset “ NOKIA 311 ASHA”, with the new one, which has been served through Speed Post.

 

5.   That I say that thereafter the said Service Center M/s. A N MOBILE TELECOM PVT. LIMITED, having it’s office at premises being no. 173, S.P. Mukherjee Road, Mudiali, Police Station – Tollygunge, Kolkata – 700 026, being the respondent no.3, call my junior, and whereas She visited to the said Service Center of NOKIA, as on 10th day of June’ 2013, and whereas the said Service Center, replaced the said Handset with the New one Handset of the same product as NOKIA 311 ASHA, having Model no. 311, IMEI No. 359330043009891, on depositing and having the said Mobile handset having IMEI Number as 354595059335415, from her, and assured that the new Handset will work properly and apologies for inconvenience caused to her, and endorsed about the replacement of the said Mobile handset on the Purchased Invoice.

 

6.   That I say that again my junior discovered the identical problems in New replaced Mobile handset “ NOKIA 311 ASHA”, and thus She wrote a letter to the Respondent / Opposite Party no.1, herein, stated inter alia requesting for refund of money and or value of the said Mobile handset “ NOKIA 311 ASHA”, since the said Mobile handset is a defective mobile handset and not working in a proper manner, and She suffered with much hazardous in operating of such mobile handset, vide her Letter dated 3rd day of July’ 2013, served through the Speed Post.

 

7.   That I say that as per my knowledge Lastly on 6th day of July’ 2013, the said Mobile Handset ( i.e. NOKIA 311 ASHA), stopped working in any manner, and thus I visited the Service Center M/s. A N MOBILE TELECOM PVT. LIMITED, having it’s office at premises being no. 173, S.P. Mukherjee Road, Mudiali, Police Station – Tollygunge, Kolkata – 700 026, and deposit the said Mobile set with them and whereas the said Service Center issued one receipt as JS No. 706 / 44, Branch Mudiali, Dated 6th day of July’ 2013, along with one Job Sheet No. 293504886 / 130706 / 44, dated 6th day of July’ 2013, as they are in opinion to send such Mobile handset to Delhi Office for repair and or replace as may be advise by their head office of the Manufacturer, being the Respondent / Opposite Party no.1, and given one Stand by Mobile handset vide Model no. X – 2, Battery – BL – 4C, for the use till the reaches of such decisions of the Respondent  / Opposite Party no.1, herein.

 

8.   That I say that as per my knowledge concern from the beginning of the purchased of the said Mobile Handset ( i.e. NOKIA 311 ASHA ), my junior being the petitioner / applicant in the present proceeding suffering a lot in a different manner and pretext, as to visit the Service Center, loss of time, loss of professional job, loss of data saved in such Mobile set, loss of several calls of Clients, loss of calls of Senior Advocate, loss of Calls of friends and relatives, and loss of calls of my mother illness and others. And whereas due to such defective mobile set I suffered with mental agony, inconvenience, and loss of money due to loss of calls of client and loss of professional job, due to loss of call of Senior Advocate, and others.

 

9.   That I say that as per my knowledge concern She assessed such losses as to the tune of Rs. 2,00,000/- ( Rupees Two Lakhs ) only, and entitled to get such amount of losses, which has been occurred only due to the defective Mobile Handset ( i.e. NOKIA 311 ASHA ), provided by the Respondents herein.

 

10.                That I say that the Mobile is a necessity to her, as to have track with the Clients and with the Learned Senior Advocates, in her professional work, and also urgent to her in the event of the connection with her family members and friends, and whereas such defective Mobile handset ruined her profession and relationship with friends, clients, and Senior Advocates, and for such reasons alone She got frustrated and suffered immensely in several aspects in sever manners and others.

 

11.                That I say that in the facts and circumstances, She seeks to get refund of the money, being value of the said Mobile Hand set, which has been paid by me as on 15th day of December’ 2012, to the Respondent / Opposite Party no.2, herein, so that on receipt of such amount of the said mobile hand set, She can purchase the new mobile set of another manufacturing company, as Samsung, LG, and others, at her choice, as to bring the convenient steps to connect with necessary people related to her profession and of the Social contacts.

 

12.                That I say that She have no desire to use the standby mobile set which has been provided by the Service Center of the NOKIA, and would like to deposit with them and or return to them such stand by mobile set on receipt of the money and or value of the said Mobile Hand set, which has been paid by her as on 15th day of December’ 2012, to the Respondent / Opposite Party no.2.

 

13.                That I say that She had suffered a lot in several manner and aspects and loss so many things and suffered with frustration as well as monetarily loss, at the instances of the Respondents / Opposite Parties,  and therefore do not want to continue with any mobile handset of NOKIA company.

 

14.                 That I say that She is a victim of the purported acts and deficiency in services at the instances of the opposite parties and the acts of the opposite parties as well as the facts are well constitute the deficiency in services on the part of the opposite parties.

 

15.                 That I say that the respondents / opposite parties, shall also pay the compensation due to her for the harassment, troubles, physical inconvenience and mental agony arising directly out of the breach of duty on the part of the respondents / opposite parties. She assesses such loss and damages at Rs. 5,00,000/- ( Rupees Five lakhs ) only.

 

16.                 That I say that the purported activities of the respondents established deficiency in services, which is contrary to the Law.

 

17.                 That I say that from all of the statements made above, it is clear that the opposite parties are guilty of deficiency in service as meant in the Consumer Protection Act.

 

18.                That I say that She prays for the following relief and directions before the Hon’ble Forum, as She entitled to get in accordance with the Law :

 

i)             To direct the opposite parties / respondents to refund the money and or value of the Mobile Set ( i.e. NOIKA 311 ASHA ), as of Rs. 6,000/- ( Rupees Six Thousand ) only, which has taken through INVOICE No. 12498, dated 15th December’ 2012;

 

ii)           To direct the Opposite Parties / Respondents, as for the mental agony, inconvenience, and loss of money due to loss of calls of client and loss of professional job, due to loss of call of Senior Advocate, and others, suffered by the petitioner, from and by the purported acts and omission of the Respondents / Opposite Parties, as assessed as Rs. 2,00,000/- ( Rupees Two Lakhs ) only to your petitioner;

 

iii)          To direct the opposite parties to pay compensation, as for the harassment, troubles, loss of business, physical inconvenience and mental agony, suffered by the petitioner from the purported activities and others by the opposite party as assessed as Rs. 5,00,000/- ( Rupees Five Lakhs ) only to your petitioner;

 

iv)          To grant the cost of the proceedings ;

 

v)            To grant any other relief to the applicant / petitioner as found out by your Honour, in the facts and circumstances of the Complaint.

 

vi)          And to pass such other necessary order or orders as your Honour , may deem fit and proper for the ends of justice.

 

19.                That the facts contained in this affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge.

 

 

                                                                                      DEPONENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Verification

 

I, the above named deponent do hereby solemnly verify that the contents of my above affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge, and no part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therein.

 

Verified this ………….the day of …………….2015, at the Alipore, South 24-Parganas.

 

 

 

                                                                   DEPONENT

                                                                   Identified by me,

 

                                                                   Advocate.

Prepared in my Chamber,

 

Advocate.

Dated :………………………..…2015.

Place : Alipore, South 24-Parganas.

 

N O T A R Y

 

No comments:

Post a Comment