Before
the Hon’ble State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal, at
Bhawani Bhawan, 31, Belvedeare Road, Alipore, Kolkata – 700 027.
.
Memo of
Appeal no…………of 2013.
In the
matter of :-
An application
under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, for Condo nation of
delay in filing the above appeal;
A N D
In the matter of :-
M/s. GRSV Projects,
represented by its Proprietor Shri Rahul Das, of 25A, Raja Ram Mohan Roy Road,
Police Station – Haridevpur, Kolkata – 700 008, District – South 24 Parganas.
………..Appellant /
Respondent.
-
Versus
–
Shri Asit
Chatterjee, Son of Late Amitava Chatterjee, of 31C, Hemchandra Mukherjee Road,
Police Station – Haridevpur, Kolkata – 700 008, District – South 24 Parganas.
……………Respondent
/ Petitioner / Complainant.
To,
The Hon’ble President and his
companion Members of the State Commission.
The Petition for Condonation of
Delay in filling appeal of the appellant above named most respectfully Sheweth
as under :-
- That
on 06-02-2013, the appellant was arrested by Police, and produced before
the Learned Forum, in Execution Application being no. E.A. no. 54 of 2012,
and whereas at the time of his production in person before the Learned
Forum, an application for bail was placed and moved before the Learned
Forum, though not granted. The appellant thereafter again placed his
petition for bail along with a petition for payment of Rs. 70,000/- by
Cheque being no. 869163 dated 06-02-2013 and another Cheque being no.
869165 dated 08-02-2013, and Cash payment of Rs. 30,000/-, and whereas the
Learned Forum on accepting the payments through those cheques and cash
considering the prayer for Bail and granted Interim Bail of Rs. 10,000/-.
- That
the 6th day of February’ 2013, was the first occasion, while
the appellant came into the knowledge about the Consumer Case decisions
and other facts related to that, and whereas prior to such date the
appellant was not in any knowledge about the consumer case and more
particularly not aware about any disputes with the respondent /
Complainant.
- That
thereafter the Complainant enquire about the said Consumer Case being no.
C.C. no. 44 of 2012, through his Learned Advocate, and taken endavour to
have certified copy of the petition of Complaint and other necessary
petition/s and order/s, which has been received as on 22-03-2013.
- That
on bare perusal of the petition of Complaint it is found that the
respondent / complainant did not made party to the Land Owner and whereas
it has been stated that the appellant is Owner cum developer in respect of
the property, which is not correct versions and whereas the facts has been
suppressed and proper party has never been made and further more some
concocted story has been drawn up and allegations has been leveled by the
respondent / complainant against the appellant / respondent to clinch
issues in his favour to get order from the Learned Forum, though nothing
has ever been substantiated with any evidentiary valued documents and or
papers. The address for notice has been wrongly described in the petition
of complaint and the Xerox copy of A/D card which has been annexed to the
petition of complaint does not bear signature of the appellant /
respondent, and whereas in the proceedings before the Learned Forum, the
respondent / complainant did not submit any Evidence on Affidavit and also
did not submit any original agreement for sale as well as other documents,
upon which he relied upon, though the respondent / complainant achieved in
his endavour and the Learned Forum delivered Judgment in his favour, on
13-07-2012.
7 : That the followings are the
circumstances and reasons of delay in filing such appeal on 25-03-2013.
a. Order & Judgment passed on 13-07-2012,
and appeal filed on 25-03-2013.
b. Delay of 254 days ( i.e. 18
days in July’2012, 31 days in August’ 2012, 30 days in September’ 2012, 31days
in October’ 2012, 30 days in November’ 2012, 31days in December’ 2012, 31days
in January’ 2013, 28 days in February’ 2013, 24 days in March’ 2013 ).
c. As the said Consumer case has
been decided exparte, the Appellant was not in the knowledge of the said Case.
d. The Knowledge of the Order
& Judgment only came on 06-02-2013, while the appellant was arrested and
produced before the Learned Forum.
e. From 06-02-2013 and appeal
filed on 25-03-2013, containing the days of 46 numbers, wherein 21 days
included for obtaining Certified Copy of the impugned order and judgment dated 13-07-2012.
f. Remains 25 nos. of days.
g. The appellant was mush
seriously depressed, and for the reasons he could not place the appeal within
the time or at an early date, and ultimately cause delay, though such delay has
not been ever cause willfully or deliberately though the same is result of the
circumstances beyond control.
h. The appeal filed on 25-03-2013.
i. Delays caused are not willful
rather the circumstances beyond control.
8 : That the delay of 254 days
from the date of Order & Judgment dated 13-07-2012, till the date of filing
this appeal, may kindly be condone, considering the above stated circumstances
and reasons.
9 : That the Appellant /
Respondent / Opposite Party, state and submits that there has not been any
default and / or negligence and / or carelessness on the part of the Appellant
/ Respondent / Opposite Party, and as such the Appellant / Respondent /
Opposite Party, should not made to suffer.
10 : That the Appellant /
Respondent / Opposite Party, further state and submits that he was sufficiently
prevented from presenting the appeal before the Appellate Forum for the reasons
as explained in the foregoing paragraphs.
11 : That unless an appropriate
order or orders are passed for condonation of delay of 254 days in preferring
the instant appeal, appellant will suffer irreparable loss and injury.
12 : That the appellant has
been advised that otherwise he have strong merits in his case and therefore
unless the delay is condoned your appellant will suffer irreparable loss and
injury.
13 : That the appellant /
Respondent / Opposite Party, enclosed herewith the copy of Certified copy of
Judgment dated 13-07-2012 in C.C. no. 44 of 2012, and copy of the Order dated
06-02-2013, in Execution case being E.A. no. 54 of 2012, collectively marked as Annexure – “A”, for the
kind consideration of the Hon’ble State Commission.
14 : That balance of
convenience is wholly in favour of order being made as prayed for hereinabove.
In
the premises aforesaid, your Appellant most
humbly pray that Your Lordship would graciously be pleased to condone
the delay of 254 days ( Two Hundred and Fifty Four days ), caused in preferring
the above appeal;
-
AND
–
To
pass such other necessary order or orders as Your Lordship may please to
prevail the interest of administration of justice.
And for this act of kindness,
the Appellant, as in duty bound shall ever pray.
AFFIDAVIT
I, Sri Rahul Das, Son of Sri
Kanailal Das, aged about __________years, by faith Hindu, by Occupation
Business, residing at premises being no. 25A, Raja Ram Mohan Roy Road, Police
Station – Haridevpur, Kolkata – 700 008, District – South 24 Parganas, do
hereby solemnly affirm and says as follows :
1 : That I am the Proprietor of
M/s. GRSV Projects, situated at premises being no. 25A, Raja Ram Mohan Roy
Road, Police Station – Haridevpur, Kolkata – 700 008, District – South 24
Parganas.
2 : That I am competent to
swear this affidavit.
3 : That the Statements made in
paragraph nos _________to ____________are true to my knowledge, and the rests
are my humble submission before the Hon’ble State Commission.
DEPONENT
Identified
by me,
Advocate.
Prepared in my Chamber,
Advocate.
N O T
A R Y
No comments:
Post a Comment