🏛 Indian Contract Act, 1872 — Summary
📜 Overview
-
Enacted: 25 April 1872
-
Came into force: 1 September 1872
-
Objective: To define the law relating to contracts in India.
🔑 Main Parts
The Act originally had three parts:
-
General Principles of the Law of Contracts (Sections 1–75)
-
Contracts relating to Special Kinds: Contracts of Indemnity, Guarantee, Bailment, Pledge, and Agency
-
Contracts relating to Partnership (this was later separated into the Indian Partnership Act, 1932)
📘 Key Definitions (Section 2)
-
Agreement — Every promise or set of promises forming consideration for each other.
-
Contract — An agreement enforceable by law.
-
Void Agreement — Not enforceable.
-
Voidable Contract — Valid until rescinded by one party.
-
Offer/Proposal — When one person signifies willingness to do or abstain from doing something.
-
Acceptance — When the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent.
🏗 Essential Elements of a Valid Contract
✅ Offer and acceptance
✅ Lawful consideration
✅ Competent parties (major, sound mind, not disqualified)
✅ Free consent (no coercion, undue influence, misrepresentation, fraud, or mistake)
✅ Lawful object (not illegal, immoral, or opposed to public policy)
✅ Not expressly declared void
📌 Important Sections
Section | Content |
---|---|
S.1 | Short title, extent, commencement |
S.2 | Definitions |
S.10 | What agreements are contracts |
S.11 | Who are competent to contract |
S.13–19 | Consent, free consent, and factors vitiating it |
S.23 | Lawful consideration and object |
S.73–75 | Compensation for breach, penalty provisions |
⚙ Types of Contracts
-
Void Contract — Ceases to be enforceable by law.
-
Voidable Contract — One party has the option to void it.
-
Unenforceable Contract — Cannot be enforced due to technical defect.
-
Illegal Agreement — Forbidden by law.
💥 Remedies for Breach
-
Suit for damages (Section 73)
-
Suit for specific performance (under Specific Relief Act)
-
Injunctions (in certain cases)
-
Quantum meruit (reasonable payment for work done)
⚠ Key Case Laws
-
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (offer and acceptance)
-
Balfour v. Balfour (intention to create legal relations)
-
Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose (minor’s contract void)
-
Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt (acceptance of offer)
-
Hadley v. Baxendale (remoteness of damages)
📊 Quick Reference Chart
Topic | Key Rule |
---|---|
Offer | Clear, communicated, can be revoked before acceptance |
Acceptance | Absolute, communicated, matches the offer |
Consideration | Something of value, need not be adequate |
Free Consent | No coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrep., mistake |
Competency | Major, sound mind, not legally disqualified |
Legality | Object and consideration must be lawful |
No comments:
Post a Comment