๐ Key Case Laws on Section 14
1️⃣ Roshan Lal v. R.B. Mohan Singh Oberoi
Citation: AIR 1975 SC 824
✅ Principle:
The Supreme Court clarified that Section 14 is not limited only to defects of jurisdiction but also covers cases where the earlier proceeding was unable to be entertained for any cause similar to lack of jurisdiction.
✅ Takeaway:
The section is to be interpreted liberally to advance the cause of justice — it’s not just for formal jurisdictional defects but extends to similar procedural barriers.
2️⃣ Union of India v. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd.
Citation: AIR 2004 SC 1596
✅ Principle:
The Court held that Section 14 applies even to proceedings before tribunals or quasi-judicial authorities, not just civil courts.
✅ Takeaway:
The benefit of exclusion applies broadly, provided the earlier proceeding was pursued with due diligence and good faith, even if it was not before a formal civil court.
3️⃣ Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v. Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department
Citation: (2008) 7 SCC 169
✅ Principle:
The Supreme Court held that Section 14 can apply even to applications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, thus covering civil proceedings outside the traditional civil suit framework.
✅ Takeaway:
The term “civil proceedings” in Section 14 is wide and includes all civil matters, not just conventional civil suits.
4️⃣ M.P. Steel Corporation v. Commissioner of Central Excise
Citation: (2015) 7 SCC 58
✅ Principle:
The Court emphasized that good faith and due diligence are essential. If the party was negligent or careless, Section 14 would not protect them.
✅ Takeaway:
You can’t claim exclusion just because you wasted time — you must show that you acted sincerely and reasonably.
5️⃣ Krishna v. Chathappan
Citation: (1889) ILR 13 Mad 269 (Full Bench)
✅ Historical Importance:
Although a pre-Independence case, this judgment set early foundations by holding that limitation laws must be construed strictly, but equitable principles like Section 14 should be used to prevent injustice.
✨ Summary of Themes from Case Law
✔ Liberal interpretation to serve justice.
✔ Applies to tribunals, arbitration, quasi-judicial forums, not just civil courts.
✔ Essential to prove due diligence and good faith — no protection for negligent parties.
✔ Covers procedural and similar technical defects, not failures on merit.
No comments:
Post a Comment