Model Answers: Case Law Questions on Notaries Act, 1952

---

1. S.R. Venkataramaiah v. State of Mysore (1966)

• Legal Principle: The Supreme Court held that a notarized document is prima facie proof of the authenticity of the signature and contents.

• Evidentiary Effect: This case establishes that notarized documents carry a strong presumption of genuineness, easing the burden on parties to prove authenticity in court.

---

2. Manubhai Pragji Desai v. Union of India (1960)

• Importance of Official Seal: The Court emphasized that the official seal is mandatory under Section 5 to authenticate notarial acts, without which notarization may be invalid.

• Appointment Requirements: It reiterated that appointments must strictly comply with Section 3, ensuring only qualified individuals become notaries, safeguarding integrity.

---

3. P.N. Khedkar v. State of Maharashtra (1983)

• Penalties Upheld: The Court affirmed that falsely acting as a notary attracts both fines and imprisonment under Section 9 of the Act.

• Protection Against Fraud: This ruling deters unauthorized practice, thus protecting the public from forged or fraudulent notarizations.

---

4. K.V. Bhagwan v. Registrar, High Court Karnataka (1978)

• Grounds for Removal: Notaries can be removed for misconduct, conviction of moral turpitude, or ceasing to practice (Section 8).

• Procedural Safeguards: The Court stressed that removal must follow due inquiry and government procedure, ensuring fairness and accountability.

---

5. Union of India v. Namit Sharma (2014)

• Scope Clarification: Only duly appointed notaries have authority to perform notarial acts. Unauthorized individuals cannot legally notarize documents.

• Seriousness of Unauthorized Acts: Unauthorized notarization is a punishable offense under the Act, as it undermines trust and the legal validity of documents.