Before the Hon’ble State Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission, West Bengal
Khadya Bhawan, 11A, Mirza Ghalib Street,
Kolkata – 700 087.
I.A. No. ________of 2026
IN
Execution Application No. 16 of 2026
(Arising out of Consumer Case
No. SC/19/CC/263/2020)
Shri Sanjib Das … Decree Holder
/ Applicant
Versus
M/s. Riverbank Developers
Private Limited & Anr. … Judgment Debtors / Opposite Parties
L I S T O F D A T E S
|
Date |
Event |
|
2020 |
The
Decree Holder filed Consumer Complaint No. SC/19/CC/263/2020 before the
Hon’ble State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal, alleging
deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the Opposite
Parties. |
|
During
2020–2024 |
Notices
were duly served upon the Opposite Parties. They entered appearance and filed
their Written Versions but deliberately abstained from participating in the
trial proceedings. |
|
11.06.2025 |
This
Hon’ble Commission was pleased to finally allow the Consumer Complaint ex
parte on merits and passed a reasoned Order & Judgment directing the
Opposite Parties jointly and severally to refund Rs. 24,22,603/-, pay
compensation of Rs. 50,000/- and litigation cost of Rs. 30,000/- within one
month, failing which interest @ 7% per annum was payable till realisation. |
|
July
2025 |
The
statutory period for compliance with the Order & Judgment dated
11.06.2025 expired. The Opposite Parties failed to comply with the directions
of this Hon’ble Commission. |
|
2025 |
The
Decree Holder detected certain clerical and typographical errors in the
refundable amount mentioned in the judgment and accordingly filed a limited
Review Application being SC/19/RA/20/2025 seeking clerical correction only. |
|
09.10.2025 |
This
Hon’ble Commission was pleased to allow the Review Application by Order No.
17 dated 09.10.2025, correcting and clarifying the payable amounts without
altering the substantive liability of the Opposite Parties. |
|
November
2025 |
Even
after the correction order, the Opposite Parties failed and neglected to
comply with the decree. No appeal or stay was preferred or obtained. |
|
26.12.2025 |
The
Decree Holder issued a legal notice to the Opposite Parties calling upon them
to comply with the decree within fifteen days from receipt thereof. |
|
January
2026 |
Despite
service of the legal notice, the Opposite Parties neither replied nor
complied with the decree, thereby demonstrating wilful and deliberate
disobedience. |
|
2026 |
The
Decree Holder constrained to file the present Execution Application under
Sections 72 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 seeking execution,
enforcement and penal action for willful non-compliance. |
No comments:
Post a Comment