a clear enumeration and explanation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India:
๐งพ Article 14 – Equality Before Law
Text of Article 14:
"The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India."
๐น Enumerated Components of Article 14:
-
Applicability to "any person":
-
Not limited to Indian citizens — applies to citizens and non-citizens (foreigners) alike.
-
-
Obligation on "the State":
-
Includes the Government of India, State Governments, and all authorities and instrumentalities of the State (as defined in Article 12).
-
-
Two Distinct but Related Principles:
-
Equality before the law:
-
All persons are equal in the eyes of the law.
-
No one is above the law (including government officials).
-
-
Equal protection of the laws:
-
People in similar circumstances must be treated alike.
-
Allows reasonable classification, not arbitrary discrimination.
-
-
๐ Essential Features:
| Feature | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Universal application | Applies to all persons — natural or juristic. |
| Fundamental right | Justiciable — enforceable by courts under Article 32 and 226. |
| Negative and positive in nature | Prohibits arbitrary laws (negative) and requires fairness (positive). |
| Basis of Rule of Law | Embodies the concept of legal equality. |
⚖️ Key Concepts within Article 14:
-
Reasonable Classification
-
Allowed if:
-
There is an intelligible differentia.
-
There is a rational nexus between the classification and the object sought to be achieved.
-
-
-
Prohibition of Class Legislation
-
Article 14 prohibits arbitrary laws targeting or favoring specific classes without just cause.
-
๐ง⚖️ Landmark Judgments Interpreting Article 14:
| Case Name | Principle Established |
|---|---|
| State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar (1952) | Classification must be reasonable. |
| EP Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu (1974) | Equality is antithetical to arbitrariness. |
| Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) | Article 14 ensures fair procedure. |
| Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) | Reservations are valid for achieving substantive equality. |
No comments:
Post a Comment